Case law

Centmehaiey v. Secretary of Department of Health

32 Fed. Cl. 612 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 13, 1995

See Brown, v. Sec’y DHHS, 18 Cl.Ct. 834, 839 (1989) , rev’d on other grounds, 920 F.2d 918 (1990) . … For example, in Brown v.

Coast-To-Coast Financial Corp. v. United States

52 Fed. Cl. 352 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 18, 2002

See Alaska v. … .”); see also First Nationwide Bank v.

Ingram v. United States

105 Fed. Cl. 518 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 24, 2012

State Land Board v. … The rail line must have fully abandoned, or [sic] approved for abandonment by the Board or a bankruptcy court.” 49 C.F.R. § 1150.21 (current as of May 10, 2012). .

Whispell Foreign Cars, Inc. v. United States

106 Fed. Cl. 635 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 22, 2012

Owners v. … Authority over abandonment applications is now held by the [Surface Transportation Board (STB) ]." Id.; see 49 U.S.C. § 10903 (2006). .

Cyios Corporation v. United States

124 Fed. Cl. 107 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 23, 2015

Brown v. United States, 80 F. App’x 676, 679 (Fed. … Patton v. Sec’y of Dep’t of Health & Human Servs., 25 F.3d 1021, 1030 (Fed. Cir. 1994); see also Brown v. United States, 80 F. App’x 676, 678 (Fed.

Maintenance Engineers v. United States

50 Fed. Cl. 399 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 17, 2001

In accordance with the source selection plan, the Technical Evaluation Board (TEB) evaluated the Non-Price Proposals. … B3H, 75 F.3d 1577 (Fed.Cir.1996) (holding that Board of Contract Appeals should defer to agency’s best value decision as long as it is “grounded in reason ... even if the Board itself might have chosen a different bidder”

O&039;keefe v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 7, 2026

OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 23-2156V SCOTT O’KEEFE, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, v. … Mallori Browne Openchowski, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Carter v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 24, 2022

CARTER, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, v. … Mallori Browne Openchowski, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Whr Group, Inc. v. United States

121 Fed. Cl. 673 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 29, 2015

See, e.g., White v. Nicholson, 412 F.3d 1314, 1315 (Fed. Cir. 2005); Dalles Irrigation Dist. v. United States, 91 Fed. … Cl. at 58; see also Baker v. Brown, 839 F.2d 1075, 1084 (5th Cir. 1988) (stating that absent “unusual circumstances,” an award of EAJA attorneys’ fees should include a cost of living adjustment); Payne v.

Prewitt v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 25, 2023

Martinez v. United States, 333 F.3d 1295, 1310 (Fed. Cir. 2003); Rahman v. United States, 149 Fed. Cl. 685, 689 (2020). … See Walls, 582 F.3d at 1368 (stating that “review of military corrections board[s] is limited to the administrative record.”); Bailey v. United States, 145 Fed. Cl. 453, 460 (2019).

Jacob Oberstein v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 11, 2013

Federal Claims No. 12-840 C (Filed December 11, 2013) JACOB OBERSTEIN, ) Plaintiff, ) v. … In accordance with Court of Federal Claims Rule 52.2(b)(2), the clerk is directed to serve a certified copy of this order on each party and on the Board for Corrections of Naval Records.

Hansen Bancorp, Inc. v. United States

67 Fed. Cl. 411 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 24, 2005

Bank v. … Co. v.

Purtill v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 1, 2021

Mallori Browne Openchowski, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1 On June 12, 2018, Kimberly A. … PURTILL, Petitioner, No. 18-832V Chief Special Master Corcoran v.

Cebe Farms, Inc. v. United States

116 Fed. Cl. 179 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 28, 2014

Brown v. Legal Found. of Wash., 538 U.S. 216, 10 235 (2003); see also First English Evangelical Lutheran Church of Glendale v. … If the CAHFS report does describes brown colored, not red colored, chickens then the report does not pertain to Cebe chickens.

Frazier v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 16, 2024

See, e.g., 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)(1); see also Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed. Cir. 1997) (“The Court of Federal Claims is a court of limited jurisdiction.”). … Vereda, Ltda. v. United States, 271 F.3d 1367, 1375 (Fed. Cir. 2001); Joshua v. United States, 17 F.3d 378, 380 (Fed. Cir. 1994); Jones v. United States, 440 F. App’x 916, 918 (Fed. Cir. 2011); Robinson v.

Haddad v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 12, 2021

Kellogg Brown & Root Servs. v. United States, 728 F.3d 1348, 1366 (Fed. Cir. 2013) (quoting Kellogg Brown & Root Servs. v. United States, 99 Fed. Cl. 488, 501, (2011)) (internal citations omitted). … V.

Braun v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · May 25, 2018

Co. v. Joiner, 522 U.S. 146 (1997)). … Ex. 21]; Brown M.A. and J.V. Bertouch, Brief Communications: Rheumatic Complications of Influenza Vaccination, 24 Aust. NW. J. Med. 572 (1994) [Pet.

Clear Creek Community Services District v. United States

100 Fed. Cl. 78 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 8, 2011

See Moyer v. United States, 190 F.3d 1314, 1318 (Fed.Cir.1999); accord Rocovich v. … Brown v. Miss. Valley State Univ., 311 F.3d 328 , 333 n. 5 (5th Cir.2002); see also Keebler Co. v.

Zacharin v. United States

43 Fed. Cl. 185 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 19, 1999

See Brown v. Felsen, 442 U.S. 127, 131 , 99 S.Ct. 2205 , 60 L.Ed.2d 767 (1979); Foster, 947 F.2d at 476, 478 . … See Brown, 442 U.S. at 131 , 99 S.Ct. 2205 (stating that res judicata prevents litigation regarding defenses “that were previously available to the parties”).

Fournier v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 2, 2015

Plaintiff additionally asserted that he should have been afforded a medical board prior to discharge to determine his fitness for duty. … The decision to seek review from a military correction board does not -2- toll this running of the statute of limitations nor does an adverse decision by a board create a