Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersuscfc

6,911 results

1.81s

  • Stahl v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 28, 2018

    Co. v. … ""v 22.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Nortel Government Solutions, Inc. v. United States

    84 Fed. Cl. 243 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 10, 2008

    See Cubic Applications, Inc. v. United States, 37 Fed.Cl. 345 (1997); Myers Investigative & Sec. Servs. v. United States, 47 Fed.Cl. 288, 293-94 (2000); Savantage Fin. Servs., Inc. v. … Chapman Law Firm Co. v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Ingram v. United States

    105 Fed. Cl. 518 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 24, 2012

    State Land Board v. … The rail line must have fully abandoned, or [sic] approved for abandonment by the Board or a bankruptcy court.” 49 C.F.R. § 1150.21 (current as of May 10, 2012). .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Metric Construction Co. v. United States

    83 Fed. Cl. 446 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 3, 2008

    See Massie v. … See, e.g., Maki v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • American Capital Corp. v. United States

    59 Fed. Cl. 563 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 27, 2004

    See Celotex Corp. v. … See Bausch & Lomb, Inc. v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Cube Corp. v. United States

    46 Fed. Cl. 368 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 22, 2000

    B3H, 75 F.3d 1577 (Fed.Cir.1996) (holding that Board of Contract Appeals should defer to agency’s best value decision as long as it is “grounded in reason ... even if the Board itself might have chosen a different bidder” … -Fed. v.

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Little v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 21, 2019

    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 18-649V Filed: May 28, 2019 UNPUBLISHED Kellie Brown … Little, Petitioner, Special Processing Unit (SPU); v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Lion Raisins, Inc. v. United States

    52 Fed. Cl. 115 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 20, 2002

    Comm’r v. Brown, 380 U.S. 563, 571 , 85 S.Ct. 1162 , 14 L.Ed.2d 75 (1965) (statutory interpretation should not thwart obvious purpose of statute); Pitsker v. … See Keene Corp. v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Dover v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 5, 2022

    UNPUBLISHED ABBIE DOVER, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: July 5, 2022 v. … Mallori Browne Openchowski, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Krape v. United States

    35 Fed. Cl. 286 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 19, 1996

    Skirpak v. Commissioner, 84 T.C. 285, 320 , 1985 WL 15315 (1985). … The court, citing Estate of Ridgely v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wade Moye v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 18, 2015

    Police Department, the District Attorney of San Francisco, the Public Defender's Office of San Francisco, the San Francisco Superior Criminal and Civil Courts, the Mayor's Office of San Francisco, and the San Francisco Board … See Rick's Mushroom Serv., 521 F.3d at 1343 ("The plain language of the Tucker Act excludes from the Court of Federal Claims jurisdiction claims sounding in tort."); 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)(l); Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • The Estate of Jason Allen Smallwood v. United States

    130 Fed. Cl. 395 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 2, 2017

    This includes an appeal to the Board of Veterans Appeals, 38 U.S.C. § 7104, the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, 38 U.S.C. § 7252(a), and finally the Federal Circuit, 38 U.S.C. § 7292(c). … See Boston v. United States, 43 Fed.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Griffy's Landscape Maintenance LLC v. United States

    51 Fed. Cl. 667 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 17, 2001

    See Anderson Columbia Envtl., Inc. v. … See Phoenix Air Group, Inc. v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Hayes v. United States

    43 Fed. Cl. 735 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 17, 1999

    See Pacific Far East Line, Inc. v. United States, 184 Ct.Cl. 169, 184 , 394 F.2d 990, 998 (1968); Thomas Creek Lumber & Log Co. v. United States, 32 Fed. Cl. 787, 790 , aff'd, 73 F.3d 379 (Fed.Cir.1995). … . §§ 701-706 (1994); Aulston v. United States, 823 F.2d 510 , 512 n. 4. (Fed.Cir.1987).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Milik v. Hhs

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 20, 2014

    In Daubert v. … He is board-certified in neurology and psychiatry, with a special competency in child neurology and sleep medicine, and also board-certified in pediatrics. (Id. at 4; 2-Tr. 143- 44.) Currently, Dr.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • First Heights Bank, FSB v. United States

    57 Fed. Cl. 162 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 1, 2003

    BACKGROUND Background facts in this litigation can be found in First Heights Bank, FSB v. United States, 51 Fed.Cl. 659 (2001) (“First Heights I ”) and First Heights Bank, FSB v. … See Centex Corp. v. United States, 48 Fed.Cl. 625, 632-36 (2001).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Capitol Boulevard Partners v. United States

    39 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,703 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 26, 1994

    Erickson Air Crane Co. v. United States, 731 F.2d 810, 813 (Fed.Cir.1984); United States v. Johnson Controls, Inc., 713 F.2d 1541, 1557 (Fed.Cir.1983); Etchey v. United States, 15 Cl.Ct. 152, 153-54 (1988). A. … In New Era HUD’s Board of Contract Appeals did not have jurisdiction over the contractor’s claim on the basis that HUD approved a turnkey contract between the contractor and the housing authority, funded the contract through

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Ammon v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 7, 2019

    See, e.g., Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 622-23 (Fed. Cir. 1997) (describing an attempt to avoid payment of federal income taxes); United States v. … Brown v. United States, 74 Fed. Cl. 546, 550 (2006). In the instant case, the first element is met with respect to Mr.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sikorsky Aircraft Corp. v. United States

    106 Fed. Cl. 571 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 13, 2012

    Department of Interior v. Klamath Water Users Protective Ass’n, 532 U.S. 1, 8 , 121 S.Ct. 1060 , 149 L.Ed.2d 87 (2001) (quoting National Labor Relations Board v. … See Evans v. City of Chicago, 231 F.R.D. 302 , 315 n. 5 (N.D.Ill.2005); Anderson v. Marion Cnty. Sheriff's Dep’t, 220 F.R.D. 555, 563 (S.D.Ind.2004) (quoting Scott v. Board of Educ., 219 F.R.D. 333, 336 (D.N.J.2004)).

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Dolmatch Group, Ltd. v. United States

    42 Cont. Cas. Fed. 77,266 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 16, 1998

    Group v. United States, 104 F.3d 1321, 1325 (Fed.Cir.1997); City of El Centro v. United States, 922 F.2d 816, 820 (Fed.Cir.1990). … The secretary of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution possesses authority granted by statute. See 20 U.S.C. § 46 (1994). .

    Cited 19 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.