Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,911 results
0.67s
123 Fed. Cl. 62 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 1, 2015
In his complaints, plaintiff alleges that he was illegally discharged from the United States Marine Corps (“Marine Corps”) on the basis of his mental illness, and asks that the court set aside the decision of the Board for … Alford v. Pfeiffer, No. 7:11-38, 2012 WL 548806 (E.D.N.C. Fed. 21, 2012). On February 21, 2012, the district court in Alford v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 21, 2015
Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d621,623 (Fed Cir. 1997). … United States v. Sherwood,312 U.S.584,588 (1941); see also Brown, 105 F.3d aI624 (Fed. Cir. 1997). Mr. Startup's claims against the bank defendants, accordingly, must be dismissed. Mr.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedMedina Construction, Ltd. v. United States
43 Cont. Cas. Fed. 77,458 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 20, 1999
Nevertheless, plaintiff insists that this case is properly venued in Portugal rather than with this Court or the Board. … Through the CDA, Congress created parity in the jurisdiction of this Court and the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (“Board”) for purposes of reviewing appeals from CO’s decisions or resolving direct actions therefrom
Cited 40 timesPublishedMasias v. Secretary of Health & Human Services
106 Fed. Cl. 700 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 5, 2012
Wagner appealed to the Veterans Court after the Board of Veterans’ Appeals denied his benefits claim. Wagner, 640 F.3d at 1257 . The Veterans Court ruled for Mr. … The Appeals Court cited, for example, Schwarz v.
Cited 9 timesPublished37 Fed. Cl. 128 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 15, 1997
If the effective retirement date has passed, corrective action may be requested by applying to the Air Force Board for the Correction of Military Records ____ The defendant relies on the “substantial new evidence” language … See Adkins v. United States, 68 F.3d 1317, 1322 (Fed.Cir.1995). The court has closely read plaintiff’s filings for other challenges, procedural or constitutional, to the Secretary’s decision to re *131 scind retirement.
Cited 3 timesPublishedWalters v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 11, 2022
Feb. 10, 2005) (finding no reasonable basis when petitioner submitted an affidavit and no other records); Brown v. Sec'y Health & Hum. Servs., No. 99-539V, 2005 WL 1026713, *2 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. … See Brown v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., No. 09-426V, 2012 U.S. Claims LEXIS 272, 2012 WL 952268, at *10 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr.
Cited 0 timesPublishedFlores v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 3, 2021
UNPUBLISHED ANA MARGARITA FLORES, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: January 22, 2021 v. … Mallori Browne Openchowski, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedHewlett-Packard Co. v. United States
42 Cont. Cas. Fed. 77,318 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 28, 1998
In Concept Automation Inc. v. … In Butz Eng’g Corp. v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedQuality Control International v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · May 29, 2020
AR 440; see AR 488 (Source Selection Evaluation Board Recommendation for first round offers stating the same). … Co., Inc. v. United States, 47 Fed.
Cited 0 timesPublished116 Fed. Cl. 699 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 13, 2014
United States, 133 F.3d 1454, 1459 (Fed.Cir. 1998); Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed.Cir.), reh’g denied (Fed.Cir.1997); Golden Pac. Bancorp v. … Stephenson v. United States, 58 Fed.Cl. 186, 190 (2003) (emphasis in original); see also United States v. Sherwood, 312 U.S. at 588 , 61 S.Ct. 767 ; Brown v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedGillingham v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 2, 2021
UNPUBLISHED SANDRA GILLINGHAM, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: January 14, 2021 v. … Mallori Browne Openchowski, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedAnderson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 23, 2021
(not to be published) SUSAN ANDERSON, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, v. … Mallori Browne Openchowski, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished41 Fed. Cl. 701 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 31, 1998
Villier v. … See Wise v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedJZ Buckingham Investments LLC v. United States
77 Fed. Cl. 37 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 27, 2007
Eng’g Corp. v. … Co. v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedTennessen v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 6, 2021
UNPUBLISHED LAURIE TENNESSEN, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: March 5, 2021 v. … (SIRVA) Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC, for petitioner. Mallori Browne Openchowski, U.S.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedFausnaugh v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 1, 2021
UNPUBLISHED SUSAN FAUSNAUGH, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: December 1, 2020 v. … Mallori Browne Openchowski, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedThorn v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 2, 2024
Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC, for Petitioner. Mallori Browne Openchowski, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. … I award a total of $19,882.81 (representing $19,234.30 in fees plus $648.51 in costs) as a lump sum in the form of a check jointly payable to Petitioner and Petitioner’s counsel, Leah V. Durant.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedMcDonnell Douglas Corp. v. United States
41 Cont. Cas. Fed. 77,046 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 5, 1997
Texas Instruments, Inc. v. United States, 922 F.2d 810 (Fed.Cir.1991). … Thus, the Board’s decision that the Government should cover cost overruns was not the deviation from original contract terms that plaintiffs ask us to permit here.
Modified by McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. United States, 42 Cont. Cas. Fed. 77,230 (1997)Cited 13 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 11, 2017
Haines v.. … v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedDekalb County, Georgia v. United States
108 Fed. Cl. 681 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 28, 2013
See United States v. … Here, the stormwater charges were adopted, and their precise amounts were set, by the County’s board of commissioners.
Cited 12 timesPublished
Ask Donna