Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,911 results
1.74s
United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 30, 2018
See Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed. … Brown, 105 F.3d at 624 (citing United States v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedStroot v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 22, 2026
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 25-0756V HOLLY STROOT, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, v. … Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC, for Petitioner. Mallori Browne Openchowski, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedTomberlin v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 13, 2015
Petitioner cites with approval to former Special Master Richard Abell’s decision in Brown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, No. 00-182V, 2005 WL 2659073 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Sept. 21, 2005). … Petitioner further cites with approval Connolly v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedHendrickson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 9, 2021
Shoenfeld has also authored and edited 28 books and is on the editorial boards of 32 journals in the field of autoimmunity and rheumatology. … Feb. 10, 2005) (finding no reasonable basis 7 when petitioner submitted an affidavit and no other records); Brown v. Sec'y Health & Hum.
Cited 0 timesPublished75 Fed. Cl. 242 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 22, 2007
The nominal defendant was “the Chairman of the Broadcasting Board of Governors (‘BBG’), which ‘is the federal entity that oversees the International Broadcasting Bureau (“IBB”), [and] is comprised of Worldnet Television and … The first element of the Ammex test is met, as defendant in the district court action was Chairman Nathanson, the director of the Broadcasting Board of Governors, a federal agency.
Cited 3 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 29, 2021
Martinez v. … Cl. 791 (105 days); Wollman v. United States, 108 Fed. Cl. 656, 675 (2013) (90 days); Boyle v. United States, 101 Fed. Cl. 592, 604 (2011) (90 days).
Cited 0 timesUnpublished81 Fed. Cl. 440 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 21, 2008
.”); Mullenberg v. … See Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 624 (Fed.Cir.1997) (holding that the Tucker Act does not provide independent relief through declaratory judgments); Wheeler v.
Cited 27 timesPublished95 Fed. Cl. 330 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 20, 2010
Co. v. … Board) or the public at large.
Cited 19 timesPublished89 Fed. Cl. 148 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 1, 2009
Quillen could appeal the decision to the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals in Washington, D.C. within ninety days from the day he received the decision, or that Mr. Quillen could “bring an action in the U.S. … See SAI Indus. v. United States, 421 F.3d 1344, 1346 (Fed.Cir.2005). Furthermore, in Wood-Ivey Sys. Corp. v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 13, 2023
Several boards make up CORB including the Physical Evaluation Board (“PEB”) and the Navy Combat Related Special Compensation (“CRSC”) Board. … Cl. 791, 794 (105 days); Wollman v. United States, 108 Fed. Cl. 656, 675 (2013) (90 days); Boyle v. United States, 101 Fed. Cl. 592, 604 (2011) (90 days).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedWeidner v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 16, 2022
UNPUBLISHED DARCY WEIDNER, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: July 8, 2022 v. … Michael Johnson Dunn Brown, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSigma Construction, Inc. v. United States
113 Fed. Cl. 13 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 30, 2013
Todd v. … .”); see also Fisher v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · May 8, 2023
* * Plaintiff, * * v. … The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to serve a certified copy of this Order and the complaint, along with a copy of the Court’s docket sheet in this case, to the ABCMR at: Army Review Boards Agency (ARBA
Cited 0 timesUnpublished64 Fed. Cl. 583 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 31, 2005
The Civil Service Reform Act Where a matter falls within the competence of the Merit Systems Protection Board (“MSPB”) (a CSRA creation), this Court is without jurisdiction. In Lindahl v. … Throughout the act the distinction is clearly made between what the Board and the reserve banks ‘shall’ do and what they ‘may’ do.”); United States ex. rel. Siegel v.
Cited 42 timesPublished125 Fed. Cl. 119 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 3, 2016
BOP AR 224. 4 The BOP referred the radiology contract to the SBA, but 3 JRS Management filed a complaint with the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals ("Board") arguing that the agency' s decision not to exercise its option … The Board agreed, but the Federal Circuit remanded on the grounds that the Board had treated the agency's motion to dismiss as a motion for summary judgment without notice to the parties.
Cited 5 timesPublished48 Fed. Cl. 81 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 23, 2000
Brown, 380 U.S. 278, 291-92 , 85 S.Ct. 980 , 13 L.Ed.2d 839 (1965) (reviewing courts must not "rubber-stamp ... administrative decisions that they deem inconsistent with a statutory mandate or that frustrate the congressional … In Davis v.
Cited 13 timesPublished101 Fed. Cl. 485 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 21, 2011
Brown v. United States, 36 Fed.Cl. 290, 298 (1996), aff'd, 217 F.3d 858 (Fed.Cir.1999). … See Botany Worsted Mills v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedMonnens v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 30, 2019
MONNENS, on behalf of R.M., a minor child, Filed: November 21, 2019 Petitioners, Special Processing Unit (SPU); v. … Mallori Browne Openchowski, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished40 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,764 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 7, 1995
stated that it would “welcome a decision by the court that defendant is right and a proper claim was not submitted to the contracting officer because plaintiff could then renew its claim and appeal to the Armed Services Board … V 1993); Nussinow v. United States, 23 Cl.Ct. 556, 559 (1991). .
Cited 13 timesPublishedPark Tower Management, Ltd. v. United States
67 Fed. Cl. 548 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 31, 2005
See TRW, Inc. v. … See Thompson v.
Cited 17 timesPublished
Ask Donna