Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersuscfc

6,911 results

1.17s

  • ATK Thiokol, Inc. v. United States

    76 Fed. Cl. 654 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 31, 2007

    Shoshone Indians v. … See Simmons v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Ruppert v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 17, 2015

    Brown ex rel. Brown v. Sec’y of the Dept. of Health & Human Servs., 2005 WL 1026713, *2 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Mar. 11, 2005) (no reasonable basis where there were “[n]o medical records . . . filed whatsoever. … The examination performed by Suzanne Brown provides some evidence that petitioner continues to suffer residual symptoms.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Peanut Wagon, Inc. v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 26, 2026

    McAbee Const., Inc., 97 F.3d at 1435 (citing Interwest Constr. v. Brown, 29 F.3d 611, 615 (Fed. Cir. 1994)). … Standards Board (‘FASB’) Statements and Interpretations.”

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Almanza v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 11, 2018

    In addition, the government argues that under Buckhannon Board and Care Home, Inc. v. … He has been board-certified in Labor and Employment Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization since 1993. Id. Mr.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Almanza v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 11, 2018

    In addition, the government argues that under Buckhannon Board and Care Home, Inc. v. … He has been board-certified in Labor and Employment Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization since 1993. Id. Mr.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Willis v. United States

    96 Fed. Cl. 467 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 9, 2011

    See 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (b)(1); 2 Brown v. … V 2.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Joseph v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 31, 2025

    Joseph initially challenged (and then abandoned) her adverse employment action in the United States Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB).2 See Joseph v. Dep’t of Veterans Affs., No. 19-184, 2019 WL 1047598 (M.S.P.B. … See Weber v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • McGhee v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 3, 2021

    McGhee initially filed a claim, in January 2017, for incapacitation pay with the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (“ABCMR”). ECF No. 1-2 at 3. Before the ABCMR rendered a decision, however, Mr. … Black v. United States, 56 Fed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Duffy v. United States

    120 Fed. Cl. 55 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 13, 2015

    "The primary reason for UCB's failure was inadequate oversight by the Board of Directors ... and management . . . . … (quoting Williamson v. Berry, 49 U.S. 495, 496 (1850)); see also Commissioner v. Brown, 380 U.S. 563, 571 (1965).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Metzinger v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 25, 2024

    Brown Park Estates- Fairfield Development Co. v. United States, 127 F.3d 1449, 1456 (Fed. Cir. 1997) (quoting Fried- man v. United States, 159 Ct. Cl. 1, 8 (1962)). … Stone, 958 F.2d 584, 591 (4th Cir. 1992); Mitchell v. Jefferson County Board of Education, 936 F.2d 539, 548 (11th Cir. 1991); Hodgson v. Behrens Drug Co., 475 F.2d 1041, 1050 (5th Cir. 1973); Jordan, 122 Fed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hirsch v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 31, 2021

    The court reviews decisions of military records-correction boards under the standards of the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”). Walls v. United States, 582 F.3d 1358, 1367 (Fed. … Under the APA standard, the court must uphold a military records-correction board’s decision “unless it is arbitrary, capricious, contrary to law, or unsupported by substantial evidence.” Barnick v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Safeguard Base Operations, LLC v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 12, 2019

    James Caine was to be a non-voting member of the source selection evaluation board and was to “not participate in the caucus process unless specifically asked to do so by the board Leader.” … Performance Evaluation Board Report.”

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Barnard v. United States

    120 Fed. Cl. 698 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 7, 2015

    United States, 508 U.S. 200, 214 , 113 S.Ct. 2035 , 124 L.Ed.2d 118 (1993); Ride’s Mushroom Serv., Inc. v. United States, 521 F.3d at 1343 ; Alves v. United States, 133 F.3d 1454, 1459 (Fed.Cir.1998); Brown v. … United States, 77 Fed.Cl. 59, 62 (2007); see also Brown v. United States, 76 Fed.Cl. 762, 763 (2007). Even if Mr.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Patton v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 22, 2021

    Napoli is a board-certified neurologist who completed his neurology residency at Albany Medical Center in 2003. ECF No. 86 at 7. … He is licensed to practice in Massachusetts and certified by the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology. Id. at 8. Dr.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Consolidated Edison Co. v. United States

    90 Fed. Cl. 228 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 21, 2009

    Brown, McCormick On Evidence § 264 (6th ed.2006). The burden is on the party seeking to use the evidence to show the existence of each criterion. Residential Funding, 306 F.3d at 107 . Jandreau v. … The IJssel’s Foundation’s managing Board consists of three members, an EZH employee and two trust companies who appoint the members of the Board.

    Reversed on other grounds by Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. & Subsidiaries v. United States, 703 F.3d 1367 (2013)Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Santiago v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 2, 2026

    Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 33 (1992). … Mar. 4, 2025) (citing Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Thompson v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 2, 2026

    Brown v. United States, 22 F.4th 1008, 1011 (Fed. Cir. 2022) (citing Dalm, 494 U.S. at 609–10). Additionally, plaintiffs must adhere to pleading requirements outlined in RCFC 9(m). … See El v. United States, 144 Fed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Easley v. United States

    31 Fed. Cl. 129 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 28, 1994

    As explained in Moon v. … See also Letenyei v. Dep’t of Transp., 735 F.2d 528, 533 (Fed.Cir.1984). Herein, the Army based its decision to assign plaintiff a 60 percent disability rating on three Army review board decisions.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ampetrol, Inc. v. United States

    37 Fed. Cl. 422 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 6, 1997

    Rosenman, acting without the approval of the board of directors or the consent of Mr. Nociforo. Mr. Rosen-man’s interest in the action is a practical one. … See West View Hills, Inc. v. Lizau Realty Corp., 6 N.Y.2d 344 , 189 N.Y.S.2d 863, 864 , 160 N.E.2d 622, 623 (1959); Cicero Industrial Dev. Corp. v. Roberts, 63 Misc.2d 565 , 312 N.Y.S.2d 893, 898 (N.Y.Sup.Ct.1970). .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Matestic v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 20, 2019

    Filed: October 17, 2019 UNPUBLISHED RONALD MATESTIC, Petitioner, Special Processing Unit (SPU); v. … Mallori Browne Openchowski, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.