Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,911 results
1.01s
Chemical Separation Technology, Inc. v. United States
51 Fed. Cl. 771 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 11, 2002
See In re Sang Su Lee, 277 F.3d 1338, 1343 (Fed.Cir.2002) (citing numerous cases); Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. … Brown v. 3M, 265 F.3d 1349, 1351 (Fed.Cir.2001); see also Karsten Mfg. Corp. v. Cleveland Golf Co., 242 F.3d 1376, 1383 (Fed.Cir.2001); Scripps Clinic & Research Foundation v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 12, 2026
Brown Park Estates–Fairfield Dev. Co. v. United States, 127 F.3d 1449, 1457 (Fed. Cir. 1997). … Tamerlane, Ltd. v. United States, 550 F.3d 1135, 1145 (Fed. Cir. 2008) (quoting Brown Park Estates–Fairfield Dev. Co., 127 F.3d at 1456).
Cited 0 timesPublished127 Fed. Cl. 664 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 27, 2016
Mizer, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 1 Plaintiffalso lists as defendants: "Renee Brown, Deputy Chief[,] Navy, IHEODTD Contracting Office … Before filing a complaint in this court, plaintiff had filed a similar complaintwith the United States Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (ASBCA), alleging substantially the same claims, but seeking a different amount
Cited 7 timesPublished85 Fed. Cl. 431 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 29, 2009
See Griffin v. United States, 85 Fed.Cl. 179 (2008). … Bank, FSB v. United States, 864 F.2d 137 (Fed.Cir.1988); Hossein v. United States, 218 Ct.Cl. 727 , 1978 WL 8481 (1978) (per curiam); Brown v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedAkanthos Opportunity Fund, L.P. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 8, 2020
The conservatorships became effective on September 6, 2008, upon each Enterprise’s board’s consent. 1st Am. … Plaintiff counters that it is an intended third-party beneficiary of implied contracts, between the FHFA and each Enterprise’s board, in which the boards consented to the conservatorships in exchange for the FHFA-C operating
Cited 0 timesPublishedOwl Creek Asia I, L.P v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 8, 2020
The conservatorships became effective on September 6, 2008, upon each Enterprise’s board’s consent. 1st Am. … Plaintiffs counter that they are intended third-party beneficiaries of implied contracts, between the FHFA and each Enterprise’s board, in which the boards consented to the conservatorships in exchange for the FHFA-C operating
Cited 0 timesPublishedAddison-Taylor v. United States
51 Fed. Cl. 25 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 7, 2001
Dunklebarger, 130 F.3d at 1479-80 (reaffirming Carter v. Gibbs in the context of a CBA purporting to permit a choice between an appeal to the Merit Systems Protection Board and the negotiated grievance procedure). … United States v.
Cited 5 timesPublished126 Fed. Cl. 558 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 12, 2016
Bishop v. United States, 26 Cl. Ct. 281, 286 (1992) (quoting Cz`rcle K Corp. v. United States, 23 Cl. Ct. 659, 664-65 (1991)). … Shell Petroleum, Inc. v. United States, 47 Fed. Cl. 812, 819 (200()) (citing Stelco Holdz`ng v. Unitea' States, 45 Fed.
Cited 18 timesPublishedS. v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 14, 2020
Special Master Corcoran J.S., * * Petitioner, * Filed: September 24, 2019 * v … Mallori Browne Openchowski, U.S. Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedCopenhaver v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 21, 2016
She holds the Canadian equivalents of board certification in the field of pediatrics as well as the field of allergy and immunology. Tr. 331. … See Langland v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 109 Fed.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCarolina Plating Works, Inc. v. United States
102 Fed. Cl. 555 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 19, 2011
See Preseault v. … The Surface Transportation Board (STB) has exclusive authority over all the nation’s rail lines. See Chi. & N.W. Transp. Co. v. Kalo Brick & Tile Co., 450 U.S. 311, 321 , 101 S.Ct. 1124 , 67 L.Ed.2d 258 (1981).
Cited 10 timesPublishedClarke v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · May 6, 2026
Moran v. … He became board certified in neurology and psychiatry in 1993. From 1995-2000, Dr.
Cited 0 timesPublished88 Fed. Cl. 263 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 24, 2009
The Navy Discharge Review Board upheld the discharge, asserting that the plaintiff waived his right to have a court-martial. See Compl. at 2. Plaintiff does not explain why his discharge was improper. … In Young v.
Cited 14 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 17, 2021
Nathanael Brown Yale, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., with whom were Brian M. Boynton, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Martin F. Hockey, Jr., Acting Director, and Deborah A. … May 8, 2009) (citing Hohri v. United States, 782 F.2d 227, 245 n.43 (D.C. Cir. 1986), vacated on other grounds, 482 U.S. 64 (1987)) (holding that § 1981 claims are barred by sovereign immunity); Brown v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedStandard Federal Bank v. United States
62 Fed. Cl. 265 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 9, 2004
Prior to the execution of the Assistance Agreement and the Merger Agreement, the Federal Home Loan Bank Board (Bank Board) issued three resolutions approving Heritage’s merger with Family Federal. … Resolution 86-1141 authorized the Secretary of the Bank Board to issue a forbearance letter to Heritage regarding supervisory forbearance by the Bank Board and the FSLIC of certain regulatory requirements.
Cited 10 timesPublishedRenewal Body Works, Inc. v. United States
64 Fed. Cl. 609 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 1, 2005
See Commonwealth Edison Co. v. … Caldwell v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedAirport Road Associates, Ltd. v. United States
120 Fed. Cl. 706 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 14, 2015
Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 236 (1974); Henke v. United States, 60 F.3d 795, 797 (Fed. Cir. 1995). … Cl. 809, 817-18 (2011), Ramona Investment Group v. United States, 115 Fed. Cl. 704 (2014), and Kasarsky v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 296 F.3d 1331, 1336 (Fed. Cir. 2002), plaintiffs argue that Mr.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMetric Constructors, Inc. v. United States
44 Fed. Cl. 513 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 5, 1999
See Santa Fe Eng’rs, Inc. v. United States, 818 F.2d 856, 858 (Fed.Cir.1987); see also Orbas & Assoc. v. … See Tecom, Inc. v. United States, 732 F.2d 935, 937 (Fed.Cir.1984); SMS Data Products Group, Inc. v. United States, 19 Cl.Ct. 612, 615-16 (1990) (citing Glenn v.
Cited 13 timesPublishedFlorence v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 31, 2016
See Brown v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., No. 09-426V, 2013 WL 1790212, at *5 (Fed. Cl. Apr. 8, 2013), supplemented, No. 09-426V, 2013 WL 2350541 (Fed. Cl. … Of note, the deductions in Brown were for much smaller increments of time for file review (no more than .4 hours) when compared to the half hour and greater time increments billed in this case.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 8, 2020
The conservatorships became effective on September 6, 2008, upon each Enterprise’s board’s consent. 1st Am. … Plaintiff counters that it is an intended third-party beneficiary of implied contracts, between the FHFA and each Enterprise’s board, in which the boards consented to the conservatorships in exchange for the FHFA-C operating
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna