Case law

Schlihs v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 29, 2020

Minehan v. United States, 75 Fed. Cl. 249, 253 (2007); accord Henke v. United States, 60 F.3d 795, 799 (Fed. … Sept. 10, 2019) (noting that Sitcomm’s decision was a “bizarre jumble of inconsistent, nonsensical word salad” and the award was “memorialized in 28 pages of uninformative blatherskite”); see also Brown v.

Kraft, Inc. v. United States

30 Fed. Cl. 739 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 28, 1994

See Board, of Co. Supr's of Prince Wm. Co. v. United States, 27 Fed.Cl. 339, 341 (1992). . Rule 803: * * # * if: sfs (6) Records of regularly conducted activity. … The Brown Report is cited only as an example of a source of data for Dr. Knutson. . By 1932 Sheffield Farms had been a subsidiary of taxpayer's for seven years. .

Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage District v. United States

61 Fed. Cl. 624 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 18, 2004

. § 258e-l); Formanek v. … See Kansas v.

Gardner-Cook v. Secretary of Health & Human Services

59 Fed. Cl. 38 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 25, 2003

Snyder, who is board certified in toxicology, medical toxicology, toxicological chemistry, occupational medicine, and chemical pathology, determined that Ms. … He has a clinical practice, does research, and is board-certified in internal medicine, neurology, and “neuro rehab.” Further, Dr.

Casitas Municipal Water District v. United States

76 Fed. Cl. 100 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 29, 2007

V, cl. 4. … As the Supreme Court explained in Lingle v.

Urban v. United States

119 Fed. Cl. 57 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 3, 2014

Urban then responded: “Are you saying that if I am on board for at least 12 months that CACI will honor transportation back to the US? I am not talking about if I quit or was terminated for cause.” Mr. … Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 587 (1986); Principal Life Ins. Co. & Subs. v. United States, 116 Fed. Cl. 82, 88 (2014); Becho, Inc. v. United States, 47 Fed. Cl. 595, 599 (2000).

Banks v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · May 17, 2018

Cl. at 136 (citing Brown v. Weare, 152 S.W.2d 649, 652 (Mo. 1941)); Chouteau v. Mo. Pacific R.R. Co., 22 S.W. 458 (1893); Jordan v. Stallings, 911 S.W.2d 653, 658 (Mo. Ct. App. 1984). … See United States v.

Montano Electrical Contractor v. United States

114 Fed. Cl. 675 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 20, 2014

Montano filed a request with the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (“ASBCA”) for “help” on his case. ASBCA Op. at 4. … See Kokotis v.

Esterhill Boat Service Corp. v. United States

91 Fed. Cl. 483 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 28, 2010

The contracting officer eliminated Impresa’s proposal based on the technical board’s determination that it was unacceptable. … The technical board had been particularly concerned about Impresa’s management. Impresa Construz-ioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United States, 44 Fed.Cl. 540, 551 (1999).

Oden v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 1, 2026

Cir. 1993) (quoting Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 434 (1983)). … And for attorney Rachel Brown, the rate of $360.00 for 2026 is requested. Id. The requested rate for Mr.

Awdykowyz v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 18, 2025

See Spellissy v. United States, 103 Fed. Cl. 274, 282–85 (2012) (explaining that service members may challenge the procedures of a grade-determination board in the Court of Federal Claims). As noted, however, Mr. … Awdykowyz waived his ability to contest the correction board’s decision on the basis of the AGDRB’s alleged error. See Metz v. United States, 466 F.3d 991, 999 (Fed.

Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority v. United States

40 Fed. Cl. 580 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 7, 1996

See Wells Fargo Bank v. United, States, 88 F.3d 1012, 1015-16 (Fed.Cir.1996) (citing Olin Jones Sand Co. v. United States, 225 Ct.Cl. 741 (1980); Rocky Mountain Constr. Co. v. … He also stated, however, that change orders in excess of $50,000 required approval by the MBTA Board of Directors, and that the change order form would be submitted to the board “so that [it], in making an informed decision

Anderson v. United States

46 Fed. Cl. 725 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 31, 2000

See Anderson v. … Anderson argues that there was error and injustice on the part of the discharge review board and the Air Force Board for the Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR).

Emiabata v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 17, 2017

LLC v. United States, 125 Fed. C|.749,775-76 (2016); M.E.S.. Inc. v. United States, 104 Fed. CL.620,636 (2012); Armour of Am. v. United States, 69 Fed. Cl. 587, 590-91 (2006); Advanced Materials. Inc. v. … & Root Servs., Inc. v.

Foley Co. v. United States

41 Cont. Cas. Fed. 77,014 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 20, 1996

Corp. v. Merrill, 332 U.S. 380, 384-85 , 68 S.Ct. 1, 3-4 , 92 L.Ed. 10 (1947). See also S.J. Amoroso Constr. Co. v. … Neither the board decision nor the Comptroller General’s opinions are binding precedent for this court. See General Electric Co. v. United States, *793 929 F.2d 679, 682 (Fed.Cir.1991); National Forge Co. v.

Curry v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 28, 2014

* * Special Master Dorsey Petitioner, * * Joint Stipulation on Damages; v … Brown, The Brown Law Firm, L.L.L.P, Houston, TX, for petitioner. Claudia B. Gangi, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

Donnelly v. United States

28 Fed. Cl. 62 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 1, 1993

.”); Lunaas v. … In UNR, 962 F.2d at 1022 , the Federal Circuit rejected this construction of § 1500, and, in doing so, overruled a case, Brown v.

Centerra Group, LLC v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 18, 2018

SOC’s approach also included the support of a Corporate Governance Board . . . . … Corp. v. United States, 448 F.3d 1305, 1307 (Fed. Cir. 2006); see also Lujan v.

CCL Service Corp. v. United States

43 Fed. Cl. 680 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 10, 1999

Bliss Co. v. … Partnership v.

Parcel 49C Ltd. Partnership v. United States

130 Fed. Cl. 109 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 30, 2016

Co., Inc. v. United States, 111 Fed.Cl. 49, 93 (2013); DataMill, Inc. v. … V.