Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
4,740 results
1.33s
Yankee Atomic Electric Co. v. United States
54 Fed. Cl. 306 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 30, 2002
charged with making the decision, but merely establish that the documents “reflect” policy deliberations. … policies to particular facts, which clearly would be post-decisional.
Cited 19 timesPublishedAfghan American Army Services Corp. v. United States
90 Fed. Cl. 341 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 4, 2009
Vehicle operators had to be trained, qualified and properly licensed. AR Tab 1 at 57. … (c) Provide all trucks and equipment ...; (d) Recruit and vet a qualified work force ...; (e) Provide a qualified operational staff, ..., to in-elude mobilization of key personnel and badging for all employees.”
Cited 88 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · May 10, 2013
to establish the factors set forth in Althen v. … Snodgrass stated that “a fever two days after immunization is unlikely to be due to those immunizations.” Tr. 339:1-2.30 Even though Karl had a fever on two days in January, Dr.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPusateri v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 12, 2026
furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly … Savasan states: IMMUNIZATION STATUS: [Petitioner] has received all of her immunizations, receiving two of the three doses of Gardasil; however, [petitioner] has not mounted an immune response to the
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSciortino v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 25, 2024
furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly … This occurs due to immune “dysregulation”—and the cytokines have been established to play some role in PMR’s pathogenesis, despite Dr. Matloubian’s denials. Br. at 7.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished132 Fed. Cl. 663 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 23, 2017
The deed also contains the habendum language: “To [h]ave and to hold the same, together with all the rights, immunities, privileges and appurtenances to the same.” Id. at 21. … The map clearly shows that the property, highlighted in red, is contained in section four, while the rail line is below, contained in section nine. See id.
Cited 1 timesPublishedGrivna v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 16, 2020
furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly … M.G. received the flu immunization on November 20, 2013. The vaccination was administered within the United States.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedChant Engineering Co. v. United States
75 Fed. Cl. 62 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 10, 2007
They did not do a good job in convincing the committee they are qualified in supplying the test equipment. … According to the court: *68 “[Prejudice (or injury) is a necessary element of standing____[A] potential bidder must establish that it had a substantial chance of securing the award in order to establish standing----In bid
Cited 1 timesPublishedLemieux v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 5, 2026
Under the “Immunization” section of the record, it states, “Flu vaccine is felt to have triggered his immune response leading to his immune thrombocytopenia. … Consistent with the above, petitioner has established Althen prong two. V.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedDewit v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 24, 2026
He affirmed that the record “clearly in error was filed with the court”. Pet. Ex. 67 at 1. At hearing, Mr. … The IOM also discusses T cell contribution to establishment and maintenance of immune responses, clearance of pathogens, and maintenance of self-tolerance. Pet. Ex. 85 at 2.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 13, 2022
Section 7422(a) of the Internal Revenue Code waives sovereign immunity only when a taxpayer has filed a qualifying tax-refund claim with the IRS. 26 U.S.C. § 7422(a); see Chi. Milwaukee Corp. v. … Frivolous claims include those that are “clearly baseless,” “fanciful,” “fantastic,” and “delusional.” Denton v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedJacunski v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 15, 2014
HHS, 704 F.3d at 1537 (“The Loving test combines the first three Whitecotton factors, which establish significant aggravation, with the Althen factors, which establish causation.”) … However, clearly Petitioner’s condition got progressively worse during 2007.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedQuapaw Tribe of Oklahoma v. United States
123 Fed. Cl. 673 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 1, 2015
The standard of review on a motion for summary judgment is well established. … The Court will not employ a twisted interpretation of the 1833 Treaty to allow the Government to escape a promise it so clearly made.
Cited 1 timesPublishedYRT Services Corp. v. United States
38 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,512 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 6, 1993
The strengths and weaknesses of each offeror should be summarized and the qualified offers identified along with the recommended offer. … Clearly, NPS treated the limit on liability as a responsiveness issue.
Cited 19 timesPublishedin Winstar-Related Cases v. United States
37 Fed. Cl. 174 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 7, 1997
FIRREA also defined “qualifying supervisory goodwill” as supervisory goodwill existing on April 12, 1989, amortized on a straightline basis over the shorter of 20 years, or the remaining period for amortization in effect … This six-year statute of limitations is “a condition of the government’s waiver of sovereign immunity and, as such, must be strictly construed.” Hopland Band of Porno Indians v.
Cited 39 timesPublishedAdvanced Systems Development, Inc. v. United States
72 Fed. Cl. 25 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 21, 2006
The Government brief, however, clearly relied on the documents on the question of merits. … The July 5 supplemental findings for the first time establish a dollar figure for the purported economic advantages of the consolidated contract.
Cited 24 timesPublishedANAHEIM GARDENS v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 24, 2025
Riddiough clearly explained his methodology and the inputs he used to determine the economic losses for each of the FWPs’ properties. Dr. … As convincingly established at trial, she is a highly qualified expert in the field of appraisals. (See Trial Tr. vol. 10, Konikoff, 1956:4–1958:5, 1963:12–1964:20, 1977:20–1978:5, Jan. 23, 2023, ECF No. 672).
Cited 0 timesPublishedEnergy Northwest v. United States
91 Fed. Cl. 531 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 26, 2010
The Standard Contract establishes a specific methodology for paying fees to the Nuclear Waste Fund. Standard Contract, art. VIII. … Accordingly, because, as an aspect of sovereign immunity, the no-interest rule is “construed to apply broadly to claims for interest,” England v.
Cited 15 timesPublished81 Fed. Cl. 178 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 24, 2008
Dallas, 493 U.S. 215, 231 , 110 S.Ct. 596 , 107 L.Ed.2d 603 (1990) (holding that the burden is on the party seeking to exercise jurisdiction clearly to allege facts sufficient to establish jurisdiction); see also RCFC 12( … United States, 922 F.2d 816, 820 (Fed.Cir.1990) (“[T]he Claims Court held that Congress had not relinquished the Government’s sovereign immunity with respect to implied-in-law contract obligations.”).
Cited 8 timesPublishedExum v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 25, 2024
In his opinion, Petitioner’s immune self-tolerance was broken due to T-cell cross reaction, resulting from the suppression of bystander immune cells by the measles virus, allowing the immune system to attack self antigens … He specified that the innate immune response is suppressed, leading the adaptive immune response to compensate. Id. at 113.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished
Ask Donna