Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,911 results
2.32s
Coggeshall Development Corp. v. United States
39 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,566 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 1, 1993
They requested the Portsmouth Planning Board (Board) to zone a portion of the property for residential use and submitted to the Board a model for their proposed *268 development. 2 The Board invited the Navy to comment on … Wrecking Corp. v. United States, 732 F.2d 913, 917 (Fed.Cir. 1984); H.N. Bailey & Assocs. v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedFederal National Mortgage Ass'n v. United States
56 Fed. Cl. 228 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 2, 2003
Smith v. Brown, 35 F.3d 1516, 1525 (Fed.Cir.1994) (citing Northeast Marine Terminal Co. v. Caputo, 432 U.S. 249, 268 , 97 S.Ct. 2348 , 53 L.Ed.2d 320 (1977); Voris v. … Bailey v. United States, 516 U.S. 137, 145 , 116 S.Ct. 501 , 133 L.Ed.2d 472 (1995); see also Smith v. Brown, 35 F.3d at 1522-23 .
Cited 9 timesPublished29 Fed. Cl. 697 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 5, 1993
Williams v. United States, 25 Cl.Ct. 682, 684 (1992). As both President and member of the Board of Directors, plaintiff enjoyed considerable status at H & T. … Although this responsibility was “subject to the directions of the Board of Directors,” Teets was a member of the board.
Cited 8 timesPublishedCerrone v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 1, 2023
Rosenstreich is board certified as an Internal Medicine specialist by the American Board of Internal Medicine and as an Allergy/Immunology specialist by the American Board of Allergy and Immunology. … He is licensed to practice medicine in New York, Connecticut, and Pennsylvania, and is board certified by the American Board of Pediatrics and the American Board of Allergy and Clinical Immunology.
Cited 0 timesPublishedQuapaw Tribe of Oklahoma v. United States
111 Fed. Cl. 725 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 16, 2013
Goodeagle, et al. v. United States, No. 12-431L, and Thomas Charles Bear et al. v. … Brown Park Estates-Fairfield Dev. Co. v. United States, 127 F.3d 1449, 1457 (Fed. Cir. 1997).
Cited 7 timesPublished129 Fed. Cl. 589 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 19, 2016
Cabral v. United States, 317 F. App'x. 979, 981 (Fed. Cir. 2008) (holding that the First Amendment is not money-mandating); Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed. … Lea v. United States, 126 Fed. Cl. 203, 213 (2016).
Cited 5 timesPublishedColonial Press International, Inc. v. United States
113 Fed. Cl. 497 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 31, 2013
The Board’s decision is not arbitrary, capricious, is supported by substantial evidence, and is correct as a matter of law. Consequently, this Court deter *517 mines that the Board’s decision should be affirmed.” … The information on the first four bidders comes from the Contract Review Board Memo.
Cited 2 timesPublished129 Fed. Cl. 332 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 29, 2016
(citing Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341, 368 (1943); Kyer v. United States, 369 F.2d 714, 716-17 (1966), cert. denied, 387 U.S. 929 (1967); 7 U.S.C. §§ 608c, 602(4) (2000)). … On June 22, 2015, the Supreme Court held in Horne v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedButte County, Idaho v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 19, 2021
Brown Park Estates-Fairfield Dev. Co. v. United States, 127 F.3d 1449, 1455 (Fed. Cir. 1997) (internal citation and quotation omitted). … Ltd., 133 F.3d at 879 (citing Brown Park Estates–Fairfield Dev. Co., 127 F.3d at 1456; Friedman v. United States, 310 F.2d 381, 384–85 (Ct. Cl. 1962)).
Cited 0 timesPublishedKansas City Power & Light Co. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · May 10, 2019
Brown Park Estates-Fairfield Dev. Co. v. United States, 127 F.3d 1449, 1456 (Fed. Cir. 1997). The doctrine, however, does not apply when a plaintiff “really only point[s] to one alleged wrong by (Fed. … Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedFairholme Funds, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 13, 2019
The FHFA and Treasury told each Enterprise’s board that the FHFA would seize the Enterprises if the board did not consent to the conservatorship. Id. … The thrust of plaintiffs’ complaint, however, is not that the FHFA encouraged the boards to consent but rather that the FHFA bargained for the boards’ consent.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSeminole Thriftway, Inc. v. United States
42 Fed. Cl. 584 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 21, 1998
Jones Co. v. Commissioner, 19 T.C.M. … Burnet v. Harmel, 287 U.S. 103, 110 , 53 S.Ct. 74 , 77 L.Ed. 199 (1932); see also Estate of Chism v.
Cited 4 timesPublished109 Fed. Cl. 223 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 7, 2013
On June 9, 2003, Union Pacific filed a petition for exemption with the Surface Transportation Board (STB), 2 seeking permission to abandon a segment on the eastern portion of the Railroad Line, specifically, that between … William & James Brown & Co. v. McGran, 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) 479, 493 , 10 L.Ed. 550 (1840). This principle has been routinely evoked in the context of contract law. See Levy v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 4, 2018
Johnson v. United States, No. 17-353, 2017 WL 7596910, at *4 (Fed. Cl. Aug. 11, 2017) (citing United States v. Sherwood, 312 U.S. 584, 588 (1941); Stephenson v. United States, 58 Fed. Cl. 186, 190 (2003); Steward v. … See 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)(l); Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed. Cir. 1997) (noting that the Court of Federal Claims "lacks jurisdiction over tort actions against the United States") (citing Keene Corp. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAvant Assessment, LLC v. United States
134 Fed. Cl. 323 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 26, 2017
Kinetic Builder’s Inc. v. Peters, 226 F.3d 1307, 1312 (Fed. Cir. 2000). See also Placeway Constr. Corp. v. … Global v.
Cited 3 timesUnpublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 16, 2021
See Caldwell v. United States, 391 F.3d 1226, 1235 (Fed. Cir. 2004); Four Rivers Invs., Inc. v. United States, 78 Fed. Cl. 662, 664 (2007); Fru-Con Constr. Corp. v. United States, 44 Fed. … Cl. at 664 (quoting Browning Ferris Indus., Inc. & Subsidiaries v. United States, No. 05-738T, 2007 WL 1412087, at *1 (Fed. Cl. May 10, 2007)).
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnionbancal Corporation & Subsidiaries v. United States
113 Fed. Cl. 117 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 23, 2013
Co. v. United States, 70 Fed. Cl. 144, 160 (2006); see also Goldberg v. … Bartels Trust for Benefit of Cornell Univ. v. United States, 617 F.3d 1357, 1362-63 (Fed. Cir. 2010); see also Frank Lyon Co. v. United States, 435 U.S. 561, 572-73 (1978); Coltec Indus., Inc. v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedYoungblood v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services
28 Fed. Cl. 566 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 16, 1993
See, e.g., Horner v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 815 F.2d 668, 674 (Fed.Cir.1987). It is also clear that the plain meaning of a statute controls its interpretation. … Stotts v. Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, 23 Cl.Ct. 352, 361 (1991) (citing Munn v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedJulio A. Ramos v. United States
112 Fed. Cl. 79 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 1, 2013
United States, 508 U.S. 200, 214 (1993) (noting that “tort cases are outside the jurisdiction of the Court of Federal Claims”); Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623-24 (Fed. … Brown v. United States, 74 Fed. Cl. 546, 550 (2006) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1631). The parties have only addressed the question of whether Mr. Ramos’s tort claims should be transferred to a district court.
Cited 3 timesPublishedCitizens Financial Services, FSB v. United States
64 Fed. Cl. 498 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 7, 2005
Citizens Financial Services v. … LaSalle Talman v. United States,.
Cited 9 timesPublished
Ask Donna