Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,911 results
4.81s
Unitedhealth Military & Veterans Services, LLC v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 10, 2017
The Source Selection Evaluation Board’s evaluation findings were contained in two Source Selection Evaluation Board consensus reports, one for the East and West Regions. … After reviewing the Source Selection Evaluation Board’s technical, past performance, and price/cost evaluation consensus reports, the Source Selection Evaluation Board Chairperson’s report, and the Source Selection Advisory
Cited 0 timesPublishedFairholme Funds, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 13, 2019
The FHFA and Treasury told each Enterprise’s board that the FHFA would seize the Enterprises if the board did not consent to the conservatorship. Id. … The thrust of plaintiffs’ complaint, however, is not that the FHFA encouraged the boards to consent but rather that the FHFA bargained for the boards’ consent.
Cited 0 timesPublishedGuardian Angels Medical Service Dogs, Inc. v. United States
120 Fed. Cl. 8 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 22, 2015
Safety Consultants, Inc. v. United States, 95 Fed. Cl. 77, 94 (2010). … See Metrotop Plaza Assocs. v. United States, 82 Fed. Cl. 598, 602 (2008).
Cited 2 timesPublished34 Fed. Cl. 452 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 21, 1995
After plaintiffs lost their security clearances, they appealed to the Personnel Security Appeals Board, which upheld the revocations. … Plaintiffs appealed their removals to the Merit Systems Protection Board (“MSPB”), which sustained the removals under 5 U.S.C. § 7513 (1994).
Cited 1 timesPublishedJacobs Engineering Group, Inc. v. United States
75 Fed. Cl. 752 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 26, 2007
Id.; see also Doe v. … Inc. v.
Cited 4 timesPublished50 Fed. Cl. 483 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 26, 2001
Corp. v. … See Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed.Cir.1997); Shearin v. United States, 992 F.2d 1195, 1197 (Fed.Cir.1993).
Cited 15 timesPublishedMartin v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 19, 2024
Johnrose-Brown for nasal congestion and a cough that was present for one month. Id. at 21–23. Dr. … Johnrose-Brown. Pet’r’s Ex. 22 at 11–14, ECF No. 10-5. Petitioner was diagnosed with skin rash/dermatitis, and Dr. Johnrose-Brown documented that it “could be streptococcal rash if pneumonia is from strep.” Id. Dr.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished76 Fed. Cl. 376 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 24, 2007
The Court of Federal Claims does not have jurisdiction over suits against private parties; it only has jurisdiction over suits against the United States. see Sherwood, 312 U.S. at 588 , 61 S.Ct. 767 ; Brown v. … Cottrell, 42 Fed.Cl. at 149 (citing Brown, 105 F.3d at 623 ). Although this Court has no jurisdiction over the alleged implied-in-fact contract and, in any event, plaintiffs are precluded from arguing that Ms.
Cited 69 timesPublishedMcAleese v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 22, 2018
Special Processing Unit (SPU); Petitioner, Ruling on Entitlement; Uncontested; v. … Brown, Brown Law Firm, LLP, Houston, TX), for petitioner. Claudia Barnes Gangi, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished122 Fed. Cl. 584 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 30, 2015
(citing Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed.Cir.1997))), appeal dismissed, 556 Fed.Appx. 966 (Fed.Cir.2014); Haka v. United States, 107 Fed.Cl. 111 , 113—14 (2012); Kam-Almaz v. … United States, 508 U.S. 200, 214 , 113 S.Ct. 2035 , 124 L.Ed.2d 118 (1993); Rick’s Mushroom Serv., Inc. v. United States, 521 F.3d at 1343 ; Alves v. United States, 133 F.3d 1454, 1459 (Fed.Cir.1998); Brown v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedYoungblood v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services
28 Fed. Cl. 566 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 16, 1993
See, e.g., Horner v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 815 F.2d 668, 674 (Fed.Cir.1987). It is also clear that the plain meaning of a statute controls its interpretation. … Stotts v. Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, 23 Cl.Ct. 352, 361 (1991) (citing Munn v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 10, 2025
See, e.g., United States v. … United States v. Hobbs, 62 M.J. 556, 558-59 (A.F. Ct. Crim. App. 2005) (citing United States v. Ford, 23 M.J. 331, 332 (C.M.A. 1987)); United States v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished111 Fed. Cl. 160 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 3, 2013
United States, 304 U.S. 126, 132 (1938); Stanley v. Schwalby, 147 U.S. 508, 515 (1893); and United States v. … Wolfchild v. United States, 108 Fed.
Cited 6 timesPublishedCoggeshall Development Corp. v. United States
39 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,566 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 1, 1993
They requested the Portsmouth Planning Board (Board) to zone a portion of the property for residential use and submitted to the Board a model for their proposed *268 development. 2 The Board invited the Navy to comment on … Wrecking Corp. v. United States, 732 F.2d 913, 917 (Fed.Cir. 1984); H.N. Bailey & Assocs. v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedFairholme Funds, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 9, 2020
The FHFA and Treasury told each Enterprise’s board that the FHFA would seize the Enterprises if the board did not consent to the conservatorship. Id. … The thrust of plaintiffs’ complaint, however, is not that the FHFA encouraged the boards to consent but rather that the FHFA bargained for the boards’ consent.
Cited 0 timesPublished29 Fed. Cl. 697 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 5, 1993
Williams v. United States, 25 Cl.Ct. 682, 684 (1992). As both President and member of the Board of Directors, plaintiff enjoyed considerable status at H & T. … Although this responsibility was “subject to the directions of the Board of Directors,” Teets was a member of the board.
Cited 8 timesPublishedAmerican Government Properties and Houma Ssa, LLC v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 28, 2014
Plaintiffs cite a decision of the General Services Board of Contract Appeals in which the board allowed a claim to survive despite plaintiff having assigned the contract to a partnership that she created with her two sons … See, e.g., United States v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCerrone v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 1, 2023
Rosenstreich is board certified as an Internal Medicine specialist by the American Board of Internal Medicine and as an Allergy/Immunology specialist by the American Board of Allergy and Immunology. … He is licensed to practice medicine in New York, Connecticut, and Pennsylvania, and is board certified by the American Board of Pediatrics and the American Board of Allergy and Clinical Immunology.
Cited 0 timesPublishedQuapaw Tribe of Oklahoma v. United States
111 Fed. Cl. 725 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 16, 2013
Goodeagle, et al. v. United States, No. 12-431L, and Thomas Charles Bear et al. v. … Brown Park Estates-Fairfield Dev. Co. v. United States, 127 F.3d 1449, 1457 (Fed. Cir. 1997).
Cited 7 timesPublished129 Fed. Cl. 589 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 19, 2016
Cabral v. United States, 317 F. App'x. 979, 981 (Fed. Cir. 2008) (holding that the First Amendment is not money-mandating); Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed. … Lea v. United States, 126 Fed. Cl. 203, 213 (2016).
Cited 5 timesPublished
Ask Donna