Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,911 results
1.68s
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya-Puerto Rico v. United States
48 Fed. Cl. 29 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 17, 2000
Bank of America v. United States, 23 F.3d 380 , 384 (Fed.Cir.1994) (holding that an erroneous payment made by the government is no bar to the rightful claimant); D & H Distrib. Co. v. … Tuftco Corp. v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedFour Rivers Investments, Inc. v. United States
78 Fed. Cl. 662 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 4, 2007
Lincoln Bank v. United States, 60 Fed.Cl. 501, 502 (2004)). … Browning Ferris Indus., Inc. & Subsidiaries v. United States, No. 05-738T, 2007 WL 1412087 , at *1 (Fed.Cl. May 10, 2007) (citations omitted).
Cited 31 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 9, 2015
See Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 624 (Fed. Cir. 1997) ("The Tucker Act grants the Court of Federal Claims jurisdiction over suits against the United States, not against individual federal officials."). … Bob Jones Univ. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedFinancial & Realty Services, LLC v. United States
128 Fed. Cl. 770 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 21, 2016
* ************************************* Eden Brown Gaines, White Plains, MD, for plaintiff. Anthony F. … Erickson v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 17, 2022
New Hampshire v. Maine, 532 U.S. 742, 749 (2001) (quoting Davis v. Wakelee, 156 U.S. 680, 689 (1895)). … Correction boards are obligated to ‘examine relevant data and articulate a satisfactory explanation for their decisions.’” Rominger v. United States, 72 Fed. Cl. 268, 273 (2006) (citation omitted).
Cited 0 timesPublished31 Fed. Cl. 520 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 1, 1994
Total Medical Management, Inc. v. United States, 29 Fed. Cl. 296, 299 (1993) (quoting Spruill v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 978 F.2d 679, 686 (Fed.Cir.1992)); accord Adam v. … In Janowsky v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 10, 2023
After a series of unsuccessful administrative appeals, including an application to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR or Board), Lt. Col. … See Fisher v. United States, 402 F.3d 1167, 1172 (Fed. Cir. 2005).
Cited 0 timesPublishedMorse Diesel International, Inc. v. United States
74 Fed. Cl. 601 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 26, 2007
See Todd v. … Bank, FSB v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedKollasch v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · May 3, 2021
Application of the Judgment as Originally Structured Would not be Inequitable Relying on IAP Worldwide Servs. v. United States, 141 Fed. Cl. 788, 811 (2019) and Brown v. Dalton, 312 F.R.D. 239, 243 (D. … But in applying those exact standards, the courts in both IAP Worldwide and Brown declined to grant the requested relief. IAP Worldwide Servs., 141 Fed. Cl. at 818; Brown, 312 F.R.D. at 244.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSouthern National Corp. v. United States
54 Fed. Cl. 554 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 19, 2002
As the Court in Advance Bank, FSB v. … The Court recently held in LaVan, et al. v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedThe Modern Sportsman, LLC v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 5, 2026
Nathanael Brown Yale, United States Department of Justice, Civil Division, Washington, D.C., for defendant. … Expense Bd. v. Coll. Sav. Bank, 527 U.S. 627, 642 (1999) (citing Brown v. Duchesne, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 183, 197 (1856) and Consol. Fruit-Jar Co. v. Wright, 94 U.S. 92, 96 (1876)).
Cited 0 timesPublished106 Fed. Cl. 300 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 31, 2012
Wilner v. … Matteson, Inc. v.
Cited 23 timesPublished89 Fed. Cl. 668 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 24, 2009
See Officers for Justice v. San Fran. Civ. Serv. … Board of School Directors of City of Milwaukee, 616 F.2d 305, 315 (7th Cir.1980); Detroit v. Grinnell Corp., 495 F.2d 448, 456 (2d Cir.1974).
Cited 7 timesPublishedSehat Sutardja and Weili Dai v. United States
109 Fed. Cl. 358 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 27, 2013
Sutardja has been the President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chairman of Marvell’s Board of Directors. … Chevron v. United States, 467 U.S. 837, 843-844 (1984); United States v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedCalifornia Federal Bank v. United States
43 Fed. Cl. 445 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 16, 1999
See Dolmatch Group, Ltd. v. United States, 40 Fed.Cl. 431 (1998); Pacific Architects & Eng’rs Inc. v. United States, 203 Ct.Cl. 499 , 491 F.2d 734 (1974). … Neely v. United States, 152 Ct.Cl. 137 , 285 F.2d 438 (1961 )(Neely I); Neely v. United States, 167 Ct.Cl. 407 , 1964 WL 8619 (1964)(Neely II); Chain Belt Co. v. United States, 127 Ct.Cl. 38 , 115 F.Supp. 701 (1953).
Vacated in part, on other grounds by California Federal Bank, Fsb, Plaintiff-Cross v. United States, 245 F.3d 1342 (2001)Cited 29 timesPublishedIowa Bankers Benefit Plan v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · May 2, 2019
Gilmer, Davis, Brown, Koehn, Shors & Roberts, P.C., Des Moines, Iowa, for Plaintiff. Jason Bergmann, Attorney, with whom were Richard E. Zuckerman, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, David I. … Therefore, under Chevron v.
Cited 0 timesPublished71 Fed. Cl. 702 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 7, 2006
Roberta B. v. United States, 61 Fed.Cl. 631, 636 (2004) (quoting 6 FAM § 721.1(a) (2003)). … Ass’n of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTotal Medical Management, Inc. v. United States
29 Fed. Cl. 296 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 23, 1993
Mahboob v. Department of the Navy, 928 F.2d 1126, 1128 (Fed. Cir. 1991); Ransom v. United States, 900 F.2d 242, 244 (Fed.Cir. 1990); see Reynolds v. … Spruill v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 978 F.2d 679, 686 (Fed.Cir.1992); accord Adam v. United States, 26 Cl.Ct. 782, 785-86 (1992) (Bruggink, J.)
Reversed on other grounds by Total Medical Management, Inc. v. United States, 104 F.3d 1314 (1997)Cited 17 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 26, 2024
Section 81o(a) provides that “No person shall be allowed to reside within the zone except Federal, State, or municipal officers or agents whose resident presence is deemed necessary by the Board.” 19 U.S.C. § 81o(a). … See United States v. Sherwood, 312 U.S. 584, 588 (1941) (“[I]f the relief sought is against others than the United States the suit as to them must be ignored as beyond the jurisdiction of the court.”); Brown v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedEstate of Wicker v. United States
43 Fed. Cl. 172 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 17, 1999
Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc., 52 F.3d 967, 979 (Fed.Cir.1995), aff'd, 517 U.S. 370 , 116 S.Ct. 1384 , 134 L.Ed.2d 577 (1996) (quoting Unique Concepts, Inc. v. Brown, 939 F.2d 1558, 1561 (Fed.Cir.1991)). … The purpose of the National Materials Advisory Board is the advancement of materials science and engineering in the national interest.
Cited 3 timesPublished
Ask Donna