Case law

Ralph L. Jones Co. v. United States

33 Fed. Cl. 327 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 1, 1995

Wunderlich Contracting Co. v. United States, 173 Ct.Cl. 180, 194 , 351 F.2d 956 (1965); Edward R. Marden Corp. v. … The contractor was surprised that panes behind the boarded windows were broken and required complete replacement of the casements.

Curry v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 6, 2014

Brown, Brown Law Firm, LLP, Houston, TX, for petitioner. Claudia Barnes Gangi, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. … Brown, of the Brown Law Firm, LLP, in the amount of $34,557.84.

Luther Brady Tansil v. United States

113 Fed. Cl. 256 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 30, 2013

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2006)). … “[S]eeking redress of one’s rights at a corrective board is probative evidence that an individual is not under a legal disability.” Coon, 30 Fed. Cl. at 540.

Allied Home Mortgage Capital Corp. v. United States

95 Fed. Cl. 769 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 11, 2010

Weddel v. … The term does not include a decision over which the [Civilian] Board of Contract Appeals has jurisdiction. 7 C.F.R. § 11.1 .

Cheshire Hunt, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 31, 2022

As a result, the railroad petitioned the Surface Transportation Board (“STB” or the “Board”) for authorization to abandon several sections of the Sarasota-Venice railroad. Id. ¶¶ 10-18. … Surface Transportation Board, 812 F.3d 1141 (8th Cir. 2015), as a “demonstration of the Board’s broad assertion of its preemptive authority over state law and state law remedies.” ECF No. 130 at 22.

Barnes v. United States

122 Fed. Cl. 581 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 30, 2015

See Ramos v. United States, 112 Fed. … Cl.576, 578 (1997) (noting that the less stringent standard "does not allow a plaintiff to wholly disregard the timetable set by the court's rules, messages left by the court, or a show cause order"); see also Brown v.

Hooker v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 18, 2017

Cl. 401 (2012); Browning v. HHS, No. 07-453V, 2010 WL 4359237 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Sept. 27, 2010); Brown v. HHS, No. 99-539V, 2005 WL 1026713 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Mar. 11, 2005); Smith v. … Further, exhibits filed in this case show that the Maryland State Board of Physicians (“Board”) suspended Dr. Geier’s license to practice medicine on April 27, 2011 (Ex.

Ashford v. United States

43 Fed. Cl. 1 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 3, 1997

Leslie Imboden, a field officer of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB or Board), informed plaintiff that, in January 1991 (more than a year prior to contract award), A.MJB. … See Emerald Maintenance, Inc. v. United States, 925 F.2d 1425, 1428 (Fed.Cir.1991); Collins Intern., Service Co. v. United States, 744 F.2d 812, 815 (Fed.Cir.1984).

Alaska Pulp Corp. v. United States

41 Fed. Cl. 611 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 7, 1998

See Payne v. Exxon Corp., 121 F.3d 503, 507 (9th Cir.1997); Estate of Spear v. Commissioner, 41 F.3d 103, 109 (3d Cir.1994); Hyde & Drath v. Baker, 24 F.3d 1162, 1166 (9th Cir.1994); FDIC v. … Conner, 20 F.3d 1376, 1380-81 (5th Cir.1994); Wexell v. Komar Indus., 18 F.3d 916, 920 (Fed.Cir.1994); Ehrenhaus v. Reynolds, 965 F.2d 916, 921 (10th Cir.1992); Refac Int’l, Ltd. v.

Preseault v. United States

27 Fed. Cl. 69 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 10, 1992

In 1886 the State of Vermont created a Board of Railroad Commissioners. 1886 Vt. Acts No. 23. The Board exercised broad powers of general supervision of all railroads in the state operated by steam power. Id. § 5. … Lucas , — U.S. at —, 112 S.Ct. at 2901 (citing, inter alia, Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972)).

Ryco Construction, Inc. v. United States

55 Fed. Cl. 184 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 23, 2002

Brown Constructors, Inc. v. … Brown, 132 F.3d at 733 . 8 E.

Nevin v. United States

43 Fed. Cl. 151 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 25, 1999

Morris v. United States, 33 Fed.Cl. 733, 742 (1995); Catellus Development Corp. v. United States, 31 Fed.Cl. 399, 405 (1994); Maniere v. United States, 31 Fed.Cl. 410, 413-14 (1994). … That authority lies with the FDIC’s Board of Directors. The letter in question was signed by Mr. Squerrini, who is not a member of the FDIC’s Board of Directors and thus lacked actual authority. Any assertion that Mr.

Cheshire Hunt, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 31, 2022

As a result, the railroad petitioned the Surface Transportation Board (“STB” or the “Board”) for authorization to abandon several sections of the Sarasota-Venice railroad. Id. ¶¶ 10-18. … Surface Transportation Board, 812 F.3d 1141 (8th Cir. 2015), as a “demonstration of the Board’s broad assertion of its preemptive authority over state law and state law remedies.” ECF No. 130 at 22.

Marine Hydraulics International, Inc. v. United States

43 Cont. Cas. Fed. 77,465 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 27, 1999

Keco Indus., Inc. v. … Camp v.

Decristofaro v. United States

74 Fed. Cl. 717 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 30, 2006

(citations omitted); Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 624 (Fed.Cir.), reh’g denied (1997); Berdick v. United States, 222 Ct.Cl. 94, 99 , 612 F.2d 533, 536 (1979); Nat’l City Bank v. … United States, 508 U.S. 200, 214 , 113 S.Ct. 2035 , 124 L.Ed.2d 118 (1993); Alves v. Unit ed States, 133 F.3d 1454, 1459 (Fed.Cir.1998); Brown v.

Crewzers Fire Crew Transport, Inc. v. United States

111 Fed. Cl. 148 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 31, 2013

The Department of Agriculture Board of Contract Appeals granted the Government’s motion to dismiss, because no contract was entered into and therefore the Board lacked jurisdiction. Id. at 1061. … The Board determined a contract did not exist, because the contractors were not guaranteed any business. Id.

Optimization Consulting, Inc. v. United States

115 Fed. Cl. 78 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 28, 2014

In Archura LLC v. … Bliss Co. v. United States, 77 F.3d 445, 449 (Fed. Cir. 1996); Galen Med. Asso., Inc. v. United States, 369 F.3d 1324, 1330 (Fed.

Moriarty Ex Rel. Moriarty v. Secretary of Health & Human Services

120 Fed. Cl. 102 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 20, 2015

Yuval Shafrir, a board-certified pediatric neurologist in private practice as well as an assistant professor of pediatrics. Dr. … Lampe v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 219 F.3d 1357, 1360 (Fed. Cir. 2000).

W & F Building Maintenance Co. v. United States

56 Fed. Cl. 62 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 28, 2003

Serv., Inc. v. … Brown, 29 F.3d 611, 615 (Fed.Cir.1994) (“[E]xtrinsic evidence ... should not be used to introduce an ambiguity where none exists.”).

United Launch Services, LLC v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 12, 2018

Revisions Made By the Contract Management Board of Review In November 2006, the government convened a contract management board of review (Review Board) to consider whether executing the proposed advance agreements … Thor Power Tool Co. v.