Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,911 results
1.60s
81 Fed. Cl. 415 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 15, 2008
See Tyler v. United States, 220 Ct.Cl. 387 , 600 F.2d 786, 788-89 (1979) (holding that the DOSSR regulation providing for a living quarters allowance entitled the plaintiff to payment); Brown v. … See, e.g., Wells v. United States, 420 F.3d 1343, 1345-47 (Fed.Cir.2005) (citing Brown Park Estates-Fairfield Dev. Co. v. United States, 127 F.3d 1449 , 1456-57 (Fed.Cir. 1997)); Baka v.
Cited 13 timesPublishedMcDonnell Douglas Corp. v. United States
76 Fed. Cl. 385 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 3, 2007
The GSA Board made two rulings. … Satellite Co. v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedCheshire Hunt, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 31, 2022
As a result, the railroad petitioned the Surface Transportation Board (“STB” or the “Board”) for authorization to abandon several sections of the Sarasota-Venice railroad. Id. ¶¶ 10-18. … Surface Transportation Board, 812 F.3d 1141 (8th Cir. 2015), as a “demonstration of the Board’s broad assertion of its preemptive authority over state law and state law remedies.” ECF No. 130 at 22.
Cited 0 timesPublished43 Fed. Cl. 151 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 25, 1999
Morris v. United States, 33 Fed.Cl. 733, 742 (1995); Catellus Development Corp. v. United States, 31 Fed.Cl. 399, 405 (1994); Maniere v. United States, 31 Fed.Cl. 410, 413-14 (1994). … That authority lies with the FDIC’s Board of Directors. The letter in question was signed by Mr. Squerrini, who is not a member of the FDIC’s Board of Directors and thus lacked actual authority. Any assertion that Mr.
Cited 4 timesPublishedAllegheny Technologies Incorporated v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 17, 2018
Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp., 546 U.S. 500, 506 (2006); Folden v. United States, 379 F.3d 1344, 1354 (Fed. Cir. 2004). “The Court of Federal Claims is a court of limited jurisdiction.” Brown v. … Accord Brown v. United States, 74 Fed. Cl. 546, 550 (2006).
Cited 0 timesPublishedAllegheny Technologies Incorporated v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 17, 2018
Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp., 546 U.S. 500, 506 (2006); Folden v. United States, 379 F.3d 1344, 1354 (Fed. Cir. 2004). “The Court of Federal Claims is a court of limited jurisdiction.” Brown v. … Accord Brown v. United States, 74 Fed. Cl. 546, 550 (2006).
Cited 0 timesPublishedEden Isle Marina, Inc. v. the United States 0
113 Fed. Cl. 372 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 29, 2013
Sand & Gravel Co. v. … Brown Park Estates-Fairfield Dev. Co. v. United States, 127 F.3d 1449, 1455 (Fed. Cir. 1997) (internal quotation marks omitted).
Cited 37 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 29, 2022
.”); Gonzalez v. … Cir. 2020) (citing Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed.
Cited 0 timesPublishedHooker v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 18, 2017
Cl. 401 (2012); Browning v. HHS, No. 07-453V, 2010 WL 4359237 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Sept. 27, 2010); Brown v. HHS, No. 99-539V, 2005 WL 1026713 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Mar. 11, 2005); Smith v. … Further, exhibits filed in this case show that the Maryland State Board of Physicians (“Board”) suspended Dr. Geier’s license to practice medicine on April 27, 2011 (Ex.
Cited 0 timesPublishedJohnson Controls World Services, Inc. v. United States
44 Fed. Cl. 348 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 10, 1999
See Marquardt Co. v. … Support Serve., Inc. v. United States, 209 Ct.Cl. 157 , 531 F.2d 522 (1976), Northrop Aircraft, Inc. v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedJordan v. Secretary of Department of Health & Human Services
38 Fed. Cl. 148 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 31, 1993
Rak is a board-certified pediatric neurologist specializing in neurophysiology and is the Director of the Sacred Heart Regional Epilepsy Center; Dr. … Kinsbourne, on the other hand, is a pediatric neurologist with a limited private practice, who is not board-certified in either neurology or genetics.
Cited 5 timesPublishedHalter Marine, Inc. v. United States
56 Fed. Cl. 144 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 7, 2003
DNV Rules section 10 provides the rules for the on-board testing of the ship’s bridge equipment. … Cir.1996) (holding that Board of Contract Appeals should defer to agency’s best value decision as long as it is “grounded in reason ... even if the Board itself might have chosen a different bidder”); In re General Offshore
Cited 10 timesPublished128 Fed. Cl. 394 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 16, 2016
. § 6672; Failure to v. … United States v. Rem, 38 F.3d 634, 643 (2nd Cir. 1994).
Cited 3 timesPublishedRobin Industries, Inc. v. United States
29 Fed. Cl. 122 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 16, 1993
In Derrick Electric Co. v. United States, 220 Ct.Cl. 673 , 618 F.2d 122 (1979), our predecessor court considered under the Wunderlich Act a board review of a CO’s decision regarding acceptance of a VECP. … The court held that the board’s review was not improper inasmuch as the board did not examine the decision to reject the VECP on its merits, but instead determined whether the VECP had been accepted.
Cited 1 timesPublished85 Fed. Cl. 325 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 22, 2008
Mansfield v. United States, 71 Fed.Cl. 687, 692 (2006) (quoting Harbuck v. … Raymond, 31 Fed.Cl. at 518 (citing Ottaviani v.
Cited 17 timesPublishedPorter v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 9, 2025
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 24-1583V KEEVIA PORTER, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, v. … Katrina Sandifer Brown, Brown Bass & Jeter, PLLC, Jackson, MS, for Petitioner. Zoe Wade, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished95 Fed. Cl. 70 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 21, 2010
Cyprus Amax Coal Co. v. … Compare Military Order of the Purple Heart v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · May 19, 2021
Brown v. United States, 74 Fed. Cl. 546, 550 (2006) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1631). The court has already addressed the first element, finding that it lacks jurisdiction. … Sept. 10, 2019), describing Sitcomm’s decisions as “a ‘bizarre jumble of inconsistent, nonsensical word salad . . . memorialized in 28 pages of uninformative blatherskite,’” and Brown v.
Cited 0 timesPublished93 Fed. Cl. 57 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 14, 2010
v. … See, e.g., Mullenberg v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 23, 2021
Fisher v. United States, 402 F.3d 1167, 1180 (Fed. Cir. 2005); Walls v. United States, 582 F.3d 1358, 1367 (Fed. Cir. 2009) (“[J]udicial review of decisions of military correction boards is conducted under the APA.”). … Cir. 1988) (citing Zunamon v. Brown, 418 F.2d 883, 886 (8th Cir. 1969)). “[E]videntiary matters outside the pleadings” may be considered when determining if a court has subject matter jurisdiction.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished
Ask Donna