Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,911 results
1.33s
United Defense, LLC v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 18, 2026
Inc. v. … Id. at 1440; see also AR Tab 12 at 1362 (Technical Evaluation Board Report).
Cited 0 timesPublishedInformation Systems & Networks Corp. v. United States
48 Fed. Cl. 265 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 30, 2000
Also, the court will accord some deference to the construal of the regulation by an agency’s board of appeals, when such board possesses particular expertise in determining the meaning of the regulation. Titan Corp. v. … Unfortunately, few board of appeal decisions have attempted to interpret the Taxes Provision.
Cited 4 timesPublishedNichols v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 26, 2018
Exhibit C, tab 3 (Brown) at 1143. … Tori v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 83 Fed.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCsx Transportation, Inc. v. United States
123 Fed. Cl. 244 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 18, 2015
Prior to the entry of a final judgment by a court or a decision by an agency board, the court or agency board shall require a defective certification to be corrected. 41 U.S.C. § 7103(b)( … Leonardo v. United States, 60 Fed.
Cited 5 timesPublishedLove Terminal Partners, L.P. v. United States
99 Fed. Cl. 472 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 18, 2011
Caldwell v. United States, 391 F.3d 1226, 1235 (Fed.Cir.2004); Four Rivers Invs., Inc. v. United States, 78 Fed.Cl. 662, 664 (2007); Fru-Con Constr. Corp. v. … Ferris Indus., Inc. & Subsidiaries v.
Cited 0 timesPublished124 Fed. Cl. 46 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 21, 2015
The United States later dissolved the Board for the Validation of German Bonds in 1960. Def. Mot. at 4; Pl. Opp. at 3. … United States v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedEllis v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 5, 2018
A four-year old checkup took place on September 2, 2014, with Denver Brown, a pediatrician. Dr. Brown noted that Ms. … To meet his burden of proof, the Secretary presented opinions from a board-certified pediatric neurologist, Ihor Rak, and a board-certified geneticist, Leslie Raffel.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 10, 2020
Barnick v. United States, 591 F.3d 1372, 1377 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (citation omitted). The court does not sit as a “super correction board,” Skinner v. … Strand v. United States, 951 F.3d 1347, 1351 (Fed. Cir. 2020) (quoting Consol. Edison Co. of N.Y. v. NLRB, 305 U.S. 197, 229 (1938)).
Cited 0 timesPublished27 Fed. Cl. 104 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 12, 1992
Lewis v. United States, 45 C.M.R. 937 (C.M.A.1972). … Id. at 10-13; see id. at 13 (citing White v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedFluor Intercontinental, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 11, 2020
Lee Paul Curtis, Perkins Coie, Washington, DC, for defendant-intervenor, Kellogg, Brown & Root Services, Inc. … Last, plaintiff claims the Agency “engaged in an unsubstantiated, across-the-board elevation of KBR[] and Vectrus’[s] Technical/Management ratings at the expense of Fluor.” Id. at 15 (capitalization omitted).
Cited 0 timesPublished41 Fed. Cl. 695 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 28, 1998
Maier v. Orr, 754 F.2d 973, 980 (1985) (citing Gilligan v. Morgan, 413 U.S. 1, 6 , 93 S.Ct. 2440 , 37 L.Ed.2d 407 (1973); Lindenau v. Alexander, 663 F.2d 68, 72 (10th Cir.1981)). … See Davis v.
Cited 0 timesPublished48 Fed. Cl. 166 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 25, 2000
See 28 U.S.C. § 1491 (a)(1); Palmer v. … See 37 U.S.C. § 204 (a)(1); see also Palmer, 168 F.3d at 1314 ; Holley v.
Cited 3 timesPublished127 Fed. Cl. 505 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 22, 2016
Brass submitted an application to the Physical Disability Board of Review (“PDBR”), pursuant to the Wounded Warrior Act, Pub. L. … Def.’s Resp. 24-25 (citing Farrar v. Hobby, 506 U.S. 103, 115 (1992); Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 436 (1983); Hubbard v. United States, 480 F.3d 1327, 1333 (Fed. Cir. 2007)).
Cited 2 timesPublishedAmerican Government Properties and Houma Ssa, LLC v. United States
118 Fed. Cl. 61 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 28, 2014
Plaintiffs cite a decision of the General Services Board of Contract Appeals in which the board allowed a claim to survive despite plaintiff having assigned the contract to a partnership that she created with her two sons … See, e.g., United States v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedScott Timber Co. v. United States
44 Fed. Cl. 170 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 3, 1999
See Tefft v. … .”); Heay v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedFortis Networks, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · May 9, 2019
Lechliter v. United States, 70 Fed. Cl. 536, 543 (2006) (quoting Rocovich v. United States, 933 F.2d 991, 993 (Fed. Cir. 1991)). … FM, Inc. v. United States, 555 F.3d 1375, 1380 (Fed.
Cited 0 timesPublished130 Fed. Cl. 588 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 16, 2017
. § 40122(g)(2); Back Pay v. … Bowles, 57 F.3d 407, 410–11 (4th Cir. 1995); Edwards v. Lujan, 40 F.3d 1152, 1154 (10th Cir. 1994); Brown v. Sec’y of the Army, 918 F.2d 214, 216–17 (D.C. Cir. 1990)).
Cited 0 timesPublishedDekatron Corporation v. United States
128 Fed. Cl. 115 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 16, 2016
The court stayed consideration of the government’s motion to dismiss pending resolution by the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals (“CBCA”) of an indirectly related case, DekaTron Corp. v. … Co. v. United States, 96 Ct. Cl. 186, 221 (1942)). 3 In Sundowner 102, LLC v. United States, 108 Fed.
Cited 7 timesPublishedArctic King Fisheries, Inc. v. United States
59 Fed. Cl. 360 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 27, 2004
Graves’ analysis was the F/V Brown’s Point (Brown’s Point), which sold for $1.5 mihion on or about July 8,1998, and was resold for $2.5 million shortly before the passage of the AFA. Mr. … Palazzolo, 533 U.S. at 617 , 121 S.Ct. 2448 ; see also Brown v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedTravelers Casualty & Surety Co. of America v. United States
75 Fed. Cl. 696 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 19, 2007
Plaintiffs expert, Roger Brown, supports Red Samm’s interpretation. … Brown’s (plaintiffs expert) deposition. See Def.App. 32-33. Defendant’s counsel and Brown never reached a clear understanding about which report Brown was being questioned.
Cited 22 timesPublished
Ask Donna