Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,911 results
1.81s
Cardiosom, L.L.C. v. United States
58 Cont. Cas. Fed. 305,043 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 30, 2014
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322-23 (1986). … The contract language at issue in Admiral Financial is as follows: All references to regulations of the [Federal Home Loan Bank Board (Bank Board)] or the [Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation
Cited 0 timesPublishedSterling Savings Ass'n v. United States
72 Fed. Cl. 404 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 30, 2006
In Section V of the Agreement, “Miscellaneous Provisions,” paragraph D stated: All references to regulations of the Board or the FSLIC used in this Agreement shall include any successor regulation thereto, it being expressly … The term “Board” in this Agreement refers to the Federal Home Loan Bank Board. The *406 Agreement states that FSLIC "is under the operating direction” of the Board. (Pltfs App. at 32). .
Cited 1 timesPublished43 Fed. Cl. 276 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 16, 1999
Patsy v. Board of Regents of Florida, 457 U.S. at 502 n. 4, 102 S.Ct. 2557 . … See Renegotiation Board v. Bannercraft Clothing Co., Inc., 415 U.S. 1, 24 , 94 S.Ct. 1028 , 39 L.Ed.2d 123 (1974).
Cited 1 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 9, 2017
Davis v. … In Akers v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCRANE v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 4, 2024
Moran v. … Talwar is a board-certified in pediatrics, neurology with special qualification in child neurology, clinical neurophysiology, and until 2018, was board-certified in psychiatry and neurology with a subspecialty certification
Cited 0 timesPublished132 Fed. Cl. 343 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 7, 2017
(citing Landis v. North Am. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254-55 (1936) and Hendler v. United States, 952 F.2d 1364, 1380 (Fed. Cir. 1991)). … Co. v. United States, 181 U.S. 760, 763 (1939). III.
Cited 4 timesPublished106 Fed. Cl. 704 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 25, 2012
Slater, 111 F.3d 172, 177-78 (D.C.Cir.1997) (holding a Coast Guard board’s deviation from policy to be arbitrary where the board gave no explanation for the deviation); Verbeck v. … .”); Walls v. United States, 582 F.3d 1358, 1368 (Fed.Cir.2009) (remanding a personnel decision to the military board to act on a completed record); Nutech Laundry & Textile, Inc. v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 20, 2018
. §§ 1176, 3914, 3929, 3991; Physical * Disability Review Board, 10 U.S.C. v. … A subsequent petition to the corrections board does not toll the running of the limitations period; nor does a new claim accrue upon denial of the petition by the corrections board. Real v.
Cited 0 timesPublished70 Fed. Cl. 296 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 4, 2006
“[A]bsent a concurrent colorable claim for monetary recovery,” Simanonok v. Simanonok, 918 F.2d 947, 952 (Fed.Cir.1990), the court may not hear claims for injunctive relief, Brown v. … See King, 395 U.S. at 3 , 89 S.Ct. 1501 ; Brown, 105 F.3d at 624 ; Simanonok, 918 F.2d at 952 .
Cited 4 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 7, 2021
In challenging the determinations of a military board, a plaintiff must demonstrate “by cogent and clearly convincing evidence,” Wronke v. Marsh, 787 F.2d 1569, 1576 (Fed. … “In situations in which a plaintiff seeks relief from a military corrections board ‘and later brings suit in court, any argument not previously raised before the corrections board is waived.’” Exnicios v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 7, 2021
In challenging the determinations of a military board, a plaintiff must demonstrate “by cogent and clearly convincing evidence,” Wronke v. Marsh, 787 F.2d 1569, 1576 (Fed. … “In situations in which a plaintiff seeks relief from a military corrections board ‘and later brings suit in court, any argument not previously raised before the corrections board is waived.’” Exnicios v.
Cited 0 timesPublished113 Fed. Cl. 39 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 2, 2013
See Brown Park Estates-Fairfield Dev. Co. v. United States, 127 F.3d 1449 (Fed.Cir.1997); see also Worthington v. United States, 53 Fed.Appx. 77, 81-82 (Fed.Cir.2002). … Bentsen, 846 F.Supp. 1363, 1370 (E.D.Wis.1994); see also McCay v. Brown, 106 F.3d 1577, 1579 (Fed.Cir.1997) (defining the phrase “administrative determination of entitlement” as used in 38 U.S.C. § 5110 (g)).
Cited 7 timesPublished36 Fed. Cl. 163 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 26, 1996
Allred v. United States, 33 Fed.Cl. 349, 353 (1995) appeal dismissed 78 F.3d 602 (Fed.Cir.1996); Ewing v. United States, 36 Fed.Cl. 159 (1996). … Bell v. United States, 23 Cl.Ct. 73, 76 (1991). In United States v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedCross Petroleum, Inc. v. United States
57 Fed. Cl. 34 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 20, 2003
In Cross Petroleum, Inc. v. … Co., Aerospace Group v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 23, 2025
See, e.g., Doster v. … Navy Seals 1–26 v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 25, 2019
The Federal Circuit has held that “review of a military corrections board is limited to the administrative record.” Walls v. United States, 582 F. 3d 1358, 1368 (Fed. Cir. 2009). … Quoting the Supreme Court’s language from Florida Power & Light Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 10, 2026
Nathanael Brown Yale, Commercial Litigation Branch, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for the defendant. … The 3 There is a wrinkle to claims brought for military disability retirement under the “first competent board” rule, see Jones v. United States, 30 F.4th 1094, 1100 (Fed.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedPalm Beach Isles Associates v. United States
42 Fed. Cl. 340 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 19, 1998
, Ely Margolis and Gerald Franklin, as Trustees of Last Will and Testament of Morris Brown. . … , Ely Margolis and Gerald Franklin, as Trustees of Last Will and Testament of Morris Brown.
Cited 4 timesPublished101 Fed. Cl. 280 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 27, 2011
College Savings Bank, 527 U.S. 627 , 119 S.Ct. 2199 , 144 L.Ed.2d 575 (1999), and Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. … College Savings Bank, 527 U.S. 627 , 119 S.Ct. 2199 , 144 L.Ed.2d 575 (1999), and Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedUnited Communities, LLC v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 15, 2022
See id. 3 In its reply, plaintiff also relies on the reasoning from United States v. … Co. v. United States, 111 Fed.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna