Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,911 results
0.49s
Floral Art, LLC v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 26, 2021
While “a delay in the receipt of money damages may not, standing alone, justify the denial of a motion to stay proceedings[,]” Brown v. United States, 131 Fed. … Brown, 131 Fed. Cl. at 543; see also Balagna v. United States, 138 Fed.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedPapillon Airways, Inc. v. United States
105 Fed. Cl. 154 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 5, 2012
In Lake Mead Air, Inc. v. … In order to accommodate this volume, Pa-pillon employed a “source board.” The *160 source board was a reference tool for Papil-lon to determine the most profitable potential flight times.
Cited 1 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 3, 2017
If the Court finds that the board's decision was reasonable and suppmted by substantial evidence, it will not overturn the board's decision. Wronke v. Marsh, 787 F.2d 1569, 1576 (Fed. Cir. 1986). … Coutts may not "substitute their judgment for that of the military board" when reasonable minds may differ. Banerjee v. United States, 77 Fed. Cl. 522, 533 (2007). 1.
Cited 0 timesPublished35 Fed. Cl. 749 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 24, 1996
See Baker v. United States, 34 Fed.Cl. 645 (1995). … See Baker v. United States, 34 Fed.Cl. 645 (1995). .
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 18, 2022
Under the CSRA, an employee subject to an adverse personnel action is “entitled to appeal to the Merit Systems Protection Board [(“MSPB”)].” 5 U.S.C. § 7513(d). … Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d. 621, 623 (Fed. Cir. 1997).
Cited 0 timesPublished83 Fed. Cl. 594 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 18, 2008
Brown Park Estates-Fairfield Dev. Co. v. United States, 127 F.3d 1449 , 1458 (Fed.Cir.1997). … The plaintiffs point to Brown v.
Cited 13 timesPublished40 Fed. Cl. 666 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 7, 1998
The plaintiff signed the Medical Board Report on September 12, 1993, acknowledging that he had been informed of the findings and recommendations of the medical board. … See also Dehne v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 18, 2022
To be supported by “substantial evidence,” the Board’s decision must be based on “such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.” Richardson v. … Cl. at 378; Sawyer, 930 F.2d at 1581 (“[I]n disability cases either the review boards or the correction board is competent to make a disability determination in the first instance.”); Patterson v. United States, 44 Fed.
Cited 0 timesPublishedJ. Cooper & Associates, Inc. v. United States
47 Fed. Cl. 280 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 4, 2000
We also turn to whatever guidance we can gleam from other federal courts, boards of contract appeals, and experts in the field. Among the sources of expertise are the opinions issued by the boards of contract appeals. … See United States v. L.A.
Cited 17 timesPublishedHarmonia Holdings Group, LLC v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 15, 2021
See Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. United States, 780 F.2d 74, 77 (D.C. Cir. 1985) (citations omitted); see also Kellogg Brown & Root Servs. v. United States, 117 Fed. … MLS-Multinational Logistic Servs. v. United States, 143 Fed. Cl. 341, 366 (2019); see Kellogg Brown, 117 Fed.
Cited 0 timesPublished56 Fed. Cl. 19 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 27, 2003
McClary v. … See Zufan v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 7, 2015
He was certified by the American Board of Pediatrics in 1982, the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology with special qualification in Child Neurology in 1986, and the National Board of Medical Examiners in 1978. … and the National Board of Medical Examiners.
Cited 0 timesPublished28 Fed. Cl. 580 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 2, 1993
Defendant relies on Maier v. … See Taylor v.
Cited 24 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 20, 2020
“Although there is generally no requirement that a plaintiff exhaust remedies with the applicable Corrections Board before filing suit in the Claims Court, Heisig v. United States, 719 F.2d 1153, 1155 (Fed. … Richey v. United States, 322 F.3d 1317, 1322 (Fed. Cir. 2003).” Antonellis v. United States, 723 F.3d 1328, 1333 (Fed.
Cited 0 timesPublishedYankee Atomic Electric Co. v. United States
42 Cont. Cas. Fed. 77,396 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 29, 1998
of Contract Appeals (Board). … Co. v.
Cited 18 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 8, 2021
Ass’n of Tex. v. … Section 638 also authorizes “Selective Early Retirement Boards” (“SERBs”), which the branches have historically used as a workforce shaping tool, eerily similar to the CRSPs in this case. See Christian v.
Cited 0 timesPublished51 Fed. Cl. 174 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 6, 2001
Also in 1993, the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB), the Board responsible for review of JMD’s decisions, adopted what it defined as a “significantly narrower” standard for defining LEO credit. See Bingaman v. … Brown, which the Nasem court found inadequate to show that the agency had acted in a judicial capacity. 595 F.2d at 807 .
Cited 2 timesPublished120 Fed. Cl. 806 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 8, 2015
Under the USERRA, if a veteran has a claim and the “the employer is a [flederal executive agency,” id. § 4322(a)(2)(B), jurisdiction to adjudicate the claim lies with the United States Merit Systems Protection Board (“Board … See also Bodus v.
Cited 14 timesPublished66 Fed. Cl. 487 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 15, 2005
After the two boards had made their decisions, the Court lifted the stay. … Bergman v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedJacobs Engineering Group Inc v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 26, 2025
Evaluation was intended to be conducted in two phases with two boards—the Pre-Selection Board and the Final Selection Board. (AR 6237); see FAR 36.602-2. … Contracting Servs. v. United States, 153 Fed.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna