Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
4,740 results
4.37s
Cms Contract Management Services v. United States
110 Fed. Cl. 537 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 19, 2013
As the 1999 RFP clearly demonstrates, and no party contests, since the ACCs in question in this bid protest have been performance-based since the 1999 RFP, the Court will use the term “PBCAAs” throughout the remainder of … At some point not clearly established in the record, HUD received approval to extend the contracts for an additional ten years. Id. 272. B.
Reversed by CMS Contract Management Services v. Massachusetts Housing Finance Agency, 745 F.3d 1379 (2014)Cited 6 timesPublishedFramaco International, Inc. v. United States
119 Fed. Cl. 311 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 11, 2015
Defendant indicated that “DOS has since dis-qualified Pernix Group.” … OBO found Framaco qualified previously under almost identical situations.
Cited 4 timesPublished52 Fed. Cl. 365 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 18, 2002
You also failed to establish the losses were of the type that would extend statute to seven (7) years. You also failed to establish that you had a loss of the type that would create a net operating loss. … In other words, plaintiffs do not dispute that their other losses do not qualify as bad debts. .
Cited 121 timesPublishedNew Valley Corp. v. United States
34 Fed. Cl. 703 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 5, 1996
Rather, the claim for judicial review must be dismissed, for failure to exhaust the administrative process established by the contract. See Lynch v. … Because a decision leaving a question open does not establish precedent on that issue, Gately v.
Reversed by New Valley Corporation v. United States, 119 F.3d 1576 (1997)Cited 2 timesPublishedCompubahn, Inc. v. United States
40 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,804 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 21, 1995
Between May and September 1993, the DTTC received 2,453 proposals from a variety of qualified small businesses. Each proposal was earmarked for one of 28 topic categories. … Clearly, there existed a well-established basis from which a contractual decision could be made.
Cited 26 timesPublishedSon Broadcasting, Inc. v. United States
42 Fed. Cl. 532 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 4, 1998
Such arguments clearly go to the heart of plaintiffs contract claim. B. … Sherwood, 312 U.S. 584, 590 , 61 S.Ct. 767 , 85 L.Ed. 1058 (1941) (waivers of sovereign immunity narrowly construed); Connolly v.
Cited 24 timesPublishedTenaska Washington Partners, L.P. v. United States
34 Fed. Cl. 434 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 9, 1995
Defendant must establish affirmatively a legal and contractual platform upon which arbitration may be compelled. … In fact, the qualifying language of the clause which requires continued performance might allow a court to grant injunctive relief without passing on the merits of the claim. Id. at 47 .
Cited 6 timesPublishedFire-Trol Holdings, LLC v. United States
68 Fed. Cl. 281 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 4, 2005
The IFB clearly stated that’ this contract was a full service contract, a contract that clearly required the successful bidder to supply the product. … The renewal will be established with the same terms and conditions AR 4133.
Cited 3 timesPublishedKingdomware Technologies, Inc. v. United States
107 Fed. Cl. 226 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 27, 2012
See 38 U.S.C. § 8127 (b), (c), and (d) (each qualifying its terms with the phrase “for purposes of meeting the goals of subsection (a)”). … As the government argues, the VAAR are silent as to the role of the FSS in relation to the set-aside program established by the 2006 Act.
Cited 18 timesPublishedNorthern States Power Co. v. United States
78 Fed. Cl. 449 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 26, 2007
And absent an express waiver of sovereign immunity, defendant concludes, there is no jurisdictional basis for plaintiffs demand for its cost of capital. … According to plaintiff, allowance of the former demands a waiver of sovereign immunity; the latter does not. In support of this argument, plaintiff relies upon the decision in Wickham Contracting Co. v.
Cited 23 timesPublishedRhinocorps Ltd. v. United States
85 Fed. Cl. 712 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 28, 2009
(FAR) § 52.219-6 (2000), setting aside acquisitions for qualifying small businesses. … The Federal Circuit has prescribed the factual showing that will qualify a protestor as an interested party. A plaintiff seeking to establish standing as an actual bidder must have bid or made an offer. Rex Serv.
Cited 4 timesPublishedFesanco v. Secretary of Health & Human Services
99 Fed. Cl. 28 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 16, 2011
Under these circumstances, a petitioner must establish causation in fact, ie., first, by establishing a prima facie case offering evidence of sufficient facts to establish each element of the claim and then by meeting a burden … To the contrary, the Government conceded that this case involves an ASD, and the medical records also clearly show several diagnoses of autism. Id.
Cited 37 timesPublishedVolpe v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 7, 2022
And this was manifested in B cells that were clearly in the plasmablast category, and they were transitioning to plasma cells producing lots of antibodies, and I believe that those autoantibodies were autoantibodies … Importantly, however, the robust immune responses to vaccination “[were] not accompanied by an increase in disease-specific serological immune responses.” (Id.)
Cited 0 timesPublishedKnowledge Connections, Inc. v. United States
76 Fed. Cl. 6 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 28, 2007
In February 2005, responding to the president’s direction, GSA sent OMB a proposal to establish the VETS GWAC, which GSA • described as a “streamlined acquisition vehicle” through which GSA would “offer a pre-qualified group … It responded that “[i]t was necessary to establish substantive evaluation criteria to manage the high number of anticipated proposals, to ensure awards were made to offerors well qualified to perform the breadth of the work
Cited 11 timesPublished29 Fed. Cl. 142 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 19, 1993
If a money mandating statute is found, no further waiver of sovereign immunity, beyond the Tucker Act, need be pled. Mitchell, 463 U.S. at 218 , 103 S.Ct. at 2968 ; Huston v. … Plaintiffs improperly cite to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 , 1346 and 5 U.S.C. § 702 as establishing proper jurisdiction in this court over their claims.
Cited 12 timesPublished97 Fed. Cl. 425 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 18, 2011
Defendant moved to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction on sovereign immunity grounds. Id. … If the Ninth Circuit’s decision is clearly erroneous, it would be reversible error for the Court to let it stand. See, e.g., Rodriguez v.
Cited 10 timesPublished92 Fed. Cl. 570 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 18, 2010
Chapman’s compulsive overeating diagnosis might be considered a “similar cause” even if did not qualify as a medical condition. … Clearly, if he meant the former, the statement is incorrect because Dr. Baltzer had in fact counseled Mi’.
Cited 5 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 19, 2022
Cl. at 589 (“The certificate must clearly state or show” the requirements of section 2513 are met.). … Again, this is clearly not a certificate of innocence satisfying section 2513 as it relates to Plaintiff.
Cited 0 timesPublished130 Fed. Cl. 179 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 6, 2017
According to defendant, plaintiff's deportation proceedings do not qualify as a conviction of a crime committed against the United States for which money damages are available under 28 U.S.C. § 2513. … Cl. 812, 813 (2015) ("To establish jurisdiction, however, a plaintiff seeking compensation under Section 1495 must also meet the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 2513(a)(1).").
Cited 3 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 22, 2021
To invoke this court’s jurisdiction, plaintiff bears the burden of establishing by a preponderance of the evidence that her claims are based upon the Constitution, a statute, or a regulation that “can fairly be interpreted … Cir. 1994) (stating that the Internal Revenue Code “waives the United States’ sovereign immunity from refund suits, provided the taxpayer has previously filed a qualifying administrative refund claim”) (internal citation
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna