Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterstxsd

2,190 results

2.06s

  • White v. Bastrop Energy Partners LP Do not docket in this case. Case remanded to 157th Judicial District, Harris County, TX.

    District Court, S.D. Texas · Sep 21, 2021

    These public records establish that 45 of the defendant power generator or power distribution entities are either incorporated in, have their principal place of business in, or both, in Texas. … The Madison plaintiffs sued the individual employee, clearly making him a “primary defendant.” Id.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Fillmore v. Nan Ya Plastics Corporation U.S.A.

    District Court, S.D. Texas · Sep 17, 2019

    “For an employer’s act to qualify as a materially adverse action, ‘a plaintiff must show that a reasonable employee would have found the challenged action materially adverse, which in this context means it well might have … While Fillmore contends that the way Ituburo said “white chocolate” was clearly sexual and that he frequently used the term “my dick” in front of Lin, there is no indication that Lin was aware, with the exception of the white

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Equistar Chemicals, L.P. v. Indeck Power Equipment Company

    District Court, S.D. Texas · Mar 24, 2021

    The record evidence clearly shows that it happened before, on Indeck’s watch. The skid was delivered, wrapped in plastic, to Equistar’s Tuscola plant in February 2017. … The qualifier “if [Equistar] does not use [Indeck’s] Service Technician” applies only to “at Start-Up,” and not to “the Material’s Warranty Period.”

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Storey Minerals, Ltd.

    District Court, S.D. Texas · Sep 30, 2024

    The footnote simply contains a statement clarifying the scope of that court’s ruling, which was only as to whether the negligence claims qualified as administrative expenses in the first instance. … That decision to permit the pending state-court actions to proceed doesn’t establish that the bankruptcy court cannot reach the merits of an allowance claim, where no state-court action can be

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Miniex v. Houston Housing Authority

    District Court, S.D. Texas · Sep 5, 2019

    BACKGROUND The parties’ proof at trial established the following facts. … conducted an internal investigation and concluded that the problems arose from administrative errors by the VA.30 Skalka would later find this conclusion implausible because documents within the relevant files had clearly

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.