Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
2,255 results
1.10s
Cameron Dean McCullough v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · May 20, 1999
To establish unlawful possession of a controlled substance, the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant exercised care, custody, control, and management over the contraband and that the defendant knew … Bradshaw, after being granted immunity from prosecution, testified as a State's witness.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · May 25, 2007
The standard allows the state in a timely manner to extricate itself from litigation if it is truly immune. … Plaintiffs' claims are clearly not so limited. They challenge expenditures claimed to be unlawful because they are being made pursuant to allegedly unconstitutional or unlawful appropriations.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPower Clearinghouse, Inc. v. Public Utility Commission
968 S.W.2d 537 · Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Apr 30, 1998
PCI maintains that the Utilities Code clearly and unambiguously gives submetering landlords the status of wholesale customers. The term “wholesale” is not defined in the Utilities Code. … In City of Palm Springs, 76 FERC 61,127 (1996), the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission concluded that, for federal purposes, the delivery of power through submeters is not sufficient to establish a wholesale transaction
Cited 4 timesPublished293 S.W.3d 913 · Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Aug 12, 2009
promissory notes, (2) the promissory notes do not prove that the loans were ever actually disbursed, and (3) the State’s payment history document shows that some interest was paid on the loans, but the judgment does not clearly … Sex-vice by certified mail, which is how the State served Taylor, qualifies as personal service. See Tex.R. Civ. P. 106(a)(2); Devine v. Duree, 616 S.W.2d 439, 441 (Tex.Civ.App.-Fort Worth 1981, writ dism'd by agr.).
Cited 41 timesPublishedTexas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Mar 18, 2021
HHSC and the OIG filed a plea to the jurisdiction based on sovereign immunity, which the trial court granted. … § 371.1 (Definitions) (“The following words and terms, when used in this chapter, have the following meanings unless the contest clearly indicates otherwise[.]”).
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Jul 26, 2001
And where the legislature qualifies a delegated power by specifying a method for its exercise, "[t]he prescribed method excludes all others, and must be followed." Cobra Oil & Gas Corp. v. … We cannot see that any of the various statutory powers of the PUC clearly negate SWBT's claims and statutory-construction arguments.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Feb 23, 2015
within the Act's immunity waiver. … clearly establishing that such events affect contract obli- [*65] The placement of section 2.03 in the context gations only in certain instances not found here.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCity of Waco v. Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
346 S.W.3d 781 · Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Aug 2, 2011
An interest common to members of the general public does not qualify as a personal justiciable interest.”), .203(a) (West 2011) (Texas Comm’n Envtl. Quality, Determination of Affected Person) (same). … is no right to judicial review, unless and until the Legislature has waived that immunity by conferring a right of judicial review.
Reversed on other grounds by Texas Commission on Environmental Quality v. City of Waco, 56 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 931 (2013)Cited 56 timesPublishedMichael A. Acosta v. City of Austin
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Jun 30, 2010
Acosta stated by affidavit that he "refused to sign this reprimand as it was clearly false and just Youmans['s] means of harassing me." … There is no evidence that the three positions were not filled by qualified, current employees of Austin Energy.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMichael A. Acosta v. City of Austin
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Jun 30, 2010
Acosta stated by affidavit that he “refused to sign this reprimand as it was clearly false and just Youmans[’s] means of harassing me.” … There is no evidence that the three positions were not filled by qualified, current employees of Austin Energy.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Mar 26, 2014
Louisiana, 552 U.S. 472, 477 (2008) (trial court’s ruling in third step must be sustained unless it is clearly erroneous). … examiner should report GSR particles even if the number does not meet the established level.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Aug 31, 2011
They relied on their sovereign immunity from suit and the assertion that Plaintiffs had failed to invoke section 2001.038's waiver of immunity for two reasons. … (holding that "section 2001.038 is a grant of original jurisdiction and, moreover, waives sovereign immunity").
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Aug 31, 2011
They relied on their sovereign immunity from suit and the assertion that Plaintiffs had failed to invoke section 2001.038’s waiver of immunity for two reasons. … These guidelines do not establish rules which the public is required to obey or with which it is to avoid conflict.
Cited 0 timesPublished993 S.W.2d 740 · Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · May 20, 1999
The case law clearly holds the error here was jurisdictional, thus Jack is inapplicable. We reject the State’s argument that appellant somehow failed to preserve error. … The party making the motion has the burden of establishing by a preponderance of the evidence those facts necessary for the motion to prevail.
Vacated on other grounds by Light v. State, 2000 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 39 (2000)Cited 11 timesPublishedTexas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Dec 6, 2006
Studies supporting causation have been required where the link between the action alleged and the injury suffered has not been established. See, e.g., Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc. v. … Code Ann. § 51.014(a)(5) (allowing appeal from the denial of a summary judgment motion that is based on the assertion of immunity by an officer or employee of the state or a political subdivision of the state), (6) (allowing
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Dec 6, 2006
Studies supporting causation have been required where the link between the action alleged and the injury suffered has not been established. See, e.g. , Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc. v. … Code Ann. § 51.014 (a)(5) (allowing appeal from the denial of a summary judgment motion that is based on the assertion of immunity by an officer or employee of the state or a political subdivision of the state), (6) (allowing
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Jan 9, 2015
Likewise, the TCNA requirement of pre-established reasons for nomenewal constitutes a substantive limit on the State's discretion creating a property interest. Grounds, 856 S. W.2d at 418. … Pharmacy providers clearly fall within this broad definition.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Nov 18, 2015
It must be an interpretation which expresses only the will of the makers of the law, not forced nor strained, but simply such as the words of the law in their plain sense fairly sanction and will clearly sustain.” quoted … The amicus brief from the Chiropractic Society of Texas argues that acupuncture uses “needles to treat patients, with no regard for a vertebral subluxation, thereby not qualifying under [the Chiropractic Society of Texas
Cited 0 timesPublishedNorthwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 v. City of Austin
274 S.W.3d 820 · Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Dec 31, 2008
To qualify as one for whose benefit a contract was made, the third party must benefit more than incidentally; he must be either a donee or creditor beneficiary. MCI Telecomms. Corp., 995 S.W.2d at 651 . … Nor did the City establish that the District’s suit is barred by laches.
Cited 30 timesPublishedTexas Department of Agriculture v. Shelia Latting
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Jan 5, 2018
Latting was replaced by two white, less-qualified women. … Latting established her prima facie case by both her pleadings and her evidence, but Appellant contests Latting's evidence that she was qualified for the position from which she was discharged and the positions created
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna