Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,798 results
0.72s
Linda Cloud v. Mike McKinney and Kathy Walt
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Aug 30, 2006
He was on the board. No matter what, I wouldn’t talk to her about that.” … See also Travis v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Mar 26, 2021
See, e.g., Brown v. State, 122 S.W.3d 794, 799-801 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003) (discussing different types of improper comments that trial courts could possibly make); Jones v. State, 788 S.W.2d 834, 835 (Tex. App. … Smith v. State, 499 S.W.3d 1, 6 (Tex. Crim. App. 2016) (quoting Leday v. State, 983 S.W.2d 713, 718 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998)); see also Coble v. State, 330 S.W.3d 253, 282 (Tex. Crim.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Nov 29, 2007
that the Lovelaces have misused the District's internal complaint procedure and filed a number of unfounded complaints against District employees under the District's internal complaint system, as well as with the State Board … Sys. v. Koseoglu , 2007 Tex. LEXIS 838 at *7-8 (Tex. 2007); see also Harris County v. Sykes , 136 S.W.3d 635, 639 (Tex. 2004).
Cited 0 timesPublishedReymundo Montiel v. the State of Texas
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · May 21, 2021
See Davis v. Alaska, 415 U.S. 308 (1974); Irby v. State, 327 S.W.3d 138 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010). … (mem. op., not designated for publication); see also Brown v. State, 921 S.W.2d 227, 231 (Tex. Crim.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Jun 29, 2015
Adair v. … Holder No. 09-60551, (United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit), a petition for review and order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ruling, the Fifth Circuit determined that the use of Wikipedia was not sufficiently
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Apr 2, 2015
Rodgers observed Appellant walking around the park with his cell phone out, looking around as if expecting to meet someone, and carrying brown bags that appeared to contain beer. … v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Dec 20, 2001
One of the windows was boarded up so the craps table could not be seen from outside the house. Signs posted inside the home declared “no checks, no credit, cash only.” … App. 1971); Tucker v. State, 339 S.W.2d 64, 64 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960); Zorn v. State, 321 S.W.2d 90, 90 (Tex. Crim. App. 1959); Hicks v. State, 318 S.W.2d 652, 652 (Tex. Crim. App. 1958); Dillon v.
Cited 0 timesPublished6 S.W.3d 349 · Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Nov 12, 1999
In Turner v. … The Act requires all persons claiming water from any “stream or watercourse” to present their claims for adjudication by the Texas Water Development Board, now the T.N.R.C.C. See Tex.
Cited 42 timesPublishedTexas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Jan 15, 2010
See State v. Shumake , 199 S.W.3d 279, 284 (Tex. 2006). … Comm'n v. City Pub. Serv.
Cited 0 timesPublishedJordan Smart v. the State of Texas
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Feb 16, 2024
cameras, Gowers testified that the Nitro’s driver appeared to be male, that the driver “t[ook] up most of the driver seat area,” that he would be “a larger person,” and that he was wearing “a dark colored shirt, probably brown … P. 38.1(i); Hall v. State, 663 S.W.3d 15, 35 (Tex. Crim. App. 2021); Wolfe v. State, 509 S.W.3d 325, 343 (Tex. Crim.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Jun 29, 2015
. — Austin 2009, no pet.) ...................................................... 34 Hill v. Board of Trs., 40 S.W.3d 676, 679 (Tex. … Hill v. Board of Trs., 40 S.W.3d 676, 679 (Tex. App. — Austin 2001, no pet.).
Cited 0 timesPublishedElias Villarreal v. the State of Texas
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Aug 13, 2025
Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319 (1979); Stahmann v. State, 602 S.W.3d 573, 577 (Tex. Crim. App. 2020). … ref’d) (citing Brown v. State, 716 S.W.2d 939, 946 (Tex. Crim.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCarlos Smith and Bobbie Hinojosa Smith v. Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Sep 11, 2003
Holick v. Smith, 685 S.W.2d 18, 20 (Tex. 1985). The United States Supreme Court has characterized the right to raise one=s child as essentialCa basic civil right far more precious than property rights. Stanley v. … Holley v. Adams, 544 S.W.2d 367, 370 (Tex. 1976).
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Dec 20, 2001
One of the windows was boarded up so the craps table could not be seen from outside the house. Signs posted inside the home declared “no checks, no credit, cash only.” … App. 1971); Tucker v. State, 339 S.W.2d 64, 64 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960); Zorn v. State, 321 S.W.2d 90, 90 (Tex. Crim. App. 1959); Hicks v. State, 318 S.W.2d 652, 652 (Tex. Crim. App. 1958); Dillon v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Jun 28, 2019
Honors Acad., 555 S.W.3d at 61 (quoting Board of Regents of State Colls. v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 (1972)). … Id. at 817–18 (citing Board of Regents of State Colls. v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 567 (1972)).
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Jul 28, 2005
In Spector Motor Serv., Inc. v. … In support of this theory, the Comptroller cites to Container Corp. v. Franchise Tax Board , 463 U.S. 159, 163 (1983); Armco , 467 U.S. at 640 ; Tyler Pipe , 483 U.S. at 253 ; American Trucking Ass'ns, Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Jul 28, 2005
In Western Livestock v. … In support of this theory, the Comptroller cites to Container Corp. v. Franchise Tax Board, 463 U.S. 159, 163 (1983); Armco, 467 U.S. at 640; Tyler Pipe, 483 U.S. at 253; American Trucking Ass’ns, Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMark Rodriguez and Carmen Rodriguez v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · May 8, 2008
Co. v. Murray , 437 S.W.2d 264, 266 (Tex. 1969); Intec Sys., Inc. v. Lowrey , 230 S.W.3d 913, 920 (Tex. App.--Dallas 2007, no pet.). … See Sotelo v. Gonzales , 170 S.W.3d 783, 789 (Tex. App.--El Paso 2005, no pet.); see also City of Keller v. Wilson , 168 S.W.3d 802, 819 (Tex. 2005).
Cited 0 timesPublishedMark Rodriguez and Carmen Rodriguez v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · May 8, 2008
Mansfield State Bank v. … Co. v. Murray, 437 S.W.2d 264, 266 (Tex. 1969); Intec Sys., Inc. v. Lowrey, 230 S.W.3d 913, 920 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2007, no pet.).
Cited 0 timesPublishedJ. M. v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Jan 17, 2023
The court also heard testimony from Mary Chamblis, who described herself as a “case manager” at the “Life Management Program at Western Tidewater Community Services Board” in Virginia. … Servs. v. Boyd, 727 S.W.2d 531, 533 (Tex. 1987); A.C. v. Texas Dep’t of Fam. & Protective Servs., 577 S.W.3d 689, 698–99 (Tex. App.—Austin 2019, pet. denied).
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna