Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterstxctapp3

6,798 results

1.70s

  • Toni Bunton v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services

    Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · May 16, 2007

    TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-06-00329-CV Toni Bunton, Appellant v. … Lumbis v. Texas Dep't of Protective & Regulatory Servs ., 65 S.W.3d 844 , 851 n.1 (Tex. App.--Austin 2002, pet. denied) (citing Stubbs v. Stubbs , 685 S.W.2d 643, 645-46 (Tex. 1985)); Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Elizabeth Louise Handley v. Marian C. Bloss

    Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Feb 5, 2010

    P. 166a(c); Lear Siegler, Inc. v. Perez, 819 S.W.2d 470, 471 (Tex. 1991); Holmstrom v. Lee, 26 S.W.3d 526, 530 (Tex. App.—Austin 2000, no pet.). … See Smith v. Brown, 51 S.W.3d 376, 382 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, pet. denied) (using attorney’s fees as measure of damage award under Tex. R. App. P. 45).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Jason Roche v. the City of Austin

    Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Aug 21, 2018

    Guillen v. City of San Antonio, 13 S.W.3d 428, 433 (Tex. App. … City of Lancaster v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Helen Gallagher, Barney Knight and James Miller v. David Young

    Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Oct 25, 2001

    this state and all the several agencies of government that collectively constitute the government of this state, including other agencies bearing different designations, and all departments, bureaus, boards … Dist. v. Doe, 35 S.W.3d 777, 779-80 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2001, pet. dism’d w.o.j.); University of Houston v. Elthon, 9 S.W.3d 351, 354 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1999, pet. dism’d w.o.j.); Johnson v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • McCall v. Tana Oil and Gas Corp.

    82 S.W.3d 337 · Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Oct 18, 2001

    Browning Debenture Holders’ Comm. v. DASA Corp., 560 F.2d 1078, 1088 (2d Cir.1977). … Brown, 637 S.W.2d 914, 918-19 (Tex.1982); Sullivan v. O'Brien, 85 S.W.2d 1106, 1115 (Tex.Civ.App.—San Antonio 1935, writ refd); Davidson v. First State Bank, 310 S.W.2d 678, 681 (Tex.Civ. App.—El Paso 1958, no writ).

    Reversed on other grounds by Tana Oil and Gas Corp. v. McCall, 46 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 452 (2003)Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Armando Carrizales v. Texas Department of Regulatory Services

    Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Nov 18, 1999

    See P.R.I.D.E. v. Texas Workers' Compensation Comm'n , 950 S.W.2d 175, 180 (Tex. App.--Austin 1997, no writ); Texas Dep't of Transp. v. T. Brown Constructors, Inc. , 947 S.W.2d 655, 658 (Tex. App. … See Dreyer v. Greene, 871 S.W.2d 697, 698 (Tex. 1993). A constitutional challenge not raised properly in the district court is waived on appeal. See Segovia v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In Re Jamail

    156 S.W.3d 104 · Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Dec 16, 2004

    Instead, between September 1, 2001, and February 13, 2002, PIB submitted house plans to the subdivision architectural control board, moved its sales trailer onto a lot in Section 4, and began marketing lots. … Kropp v. Prather, 526 S.W.2d 283, 286 (Tex.Civ.App.-Tyler 1975, writ refd n.r.e.); see also Taliaferro v. Smith, 804 S.W.2d 548, 550 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1991, no writ); Prappas v. Meyerland Cmty.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Herbert Rolnick v. Sight's My Line, Inc., a Florida Corporation Stewart Lantz Riggs, Aleshire & Ray Blazier, Christensen, Bigelow & Vir, P.C. And Adams & Graham

    Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Jul 9, 2015

    Brown, ___ U.S. ___, 131 S. Ct. 2846 (2011) .................................................... 15 Gordon & Doner, P.A. v. Joros, 287 S.W.3d 325 (Tex.App. … See Daimler AG v. Bauman, ___ U.S. ___, 134 S. Ct. 746, 757 (2014); Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, ___ U.S. ___, 131 S. Ct. 2846, 2853 (2011).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Goldie Denise Thorne v. State

    Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Oct 23, 2003

    BROWN, JUDGE PRESIDING M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N After a plea of guilty, the trial court found Goldie Denise Thorne guilty of theft of at least $500 but less than $1500. Tex. Pen. … Harris v. State , 827 S.W.2d 949, 956 (Tex. Crim.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ruben Guerrero v. State

    Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Aug 31, 2000

    The evidence also showed that after the accident Moore observed two passengers jump out of Guerrero's car and run off, each carrying a brown paper sack. They returned empty-handed a few minutes later. … See Ramirez v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rodney Swearingen v. State

    Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Dec 5, 2002

    See Brown v. State , 911 S.W.2d 744, 747 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995); Martinets v. State , 884 S.W.2d 185, 187 (Tex. App.--Austin 1994, no pet.). … See Brown , 911 S.W.2d at 747 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Charles Scott Harnett v. State

    Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Nov 16, 2000

    Lomas v. State, 707 S.W.2d 566, 569-70 (Tex. Crim. App. 1986); Brown v. State, 530 S.W.2d 118, 119 (Tex. Crim. App. 1975); Klueppel v. State, 505 S.W.2d 572, 574 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974). … Further, Lomas , Brown , and Klueppel were all decided prior to the 1993 amendment to article 37.07, section 3(a). See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 37.07 & 3(a) (West Supp. 2000).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Charles Scott Harnett v. State

    Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Nov 16, 2000

    Broders v. … Lomas v. State, 707 S.W.2d 566, 569-70 (Tex. Crim. App. 1986); Brown v. State, 530 S.W.2d 118, 119 (Tex. Crim. App. 1975); Klueppel v. State, 505 S.W.2d 572, 574 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mitchel Wong, M.D. and Austin Eye Clinic Association v. George W. (Willard) Graham

    Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Feb 15, 2001

    BACKGROUND On October 2, 1997, Wong, a board-certified ophthalmologist and employee of Austin Eye Clinic Association, performed cataract surgery on Graham's left eye. … Bowman is an examiner for the ophthalmology certification board. He subspecializes in corneal diseases and has treated about seventy patients with endophthalmitis.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • City of Austin v. Savetownlake.Org

    Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Aug 22, 2008

    The supreme court has established the requirements for associational standing in Texas Association of Business v. Texas Air Control Board , 852 S.W.2d 440 (Tex. 1993). … See Cox Enters., Inc. v. Board of Trustees of the Austin Indep. Sch. Dist. , 706 S.W.2d 956, 960 (Tex. 1986); Hays County Water , 41 S.W.3d at 178 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Sneed

    938 S.W.2d 181 · Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Jan 23, 1997

    See, e.g., Browning-Ferris Indus., Inc. v. Lieck, 881 S.W.2d 288 (Tex.1994); Brookshire Grocery Co. v. Richey, 899 S.W.2d 331 (Tex.App.—Tyler 1995, writ granted); Coniglio v. Snyder, 756 S.W.2d 743 (Tex.App. … Corp. v. Tovar, 932 S.W.2d 147, 155-56 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth 1996, writ requested); Campbell v. City of San Antonio, 43 F.3d 973, 981 (5th Cir.1995); see also Pokorny v. First Fed.

    Cited 34 timesPublished
  • Paula Chavez, Daniel Fagan, and April Chavez, Individually and as Next Friend of D. C., a Minor, M. G., a Minor, and S. C., a Minor And Tommy Chavez v. Silverleaf Resorts, LLC, Formerly Silverleaf Resorts, Inc And Holiday Inn Club Vacation Incorporated, Formerly Orange Lake Country Club, Inc.

    Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Apr 3, 2024

    P. 166a(c); Browning v. Prostok, 165 S.W.3d 336, 344 (Tex. 2005). “A defendant who conclusively negates at least one of the elements of the plaintiff’s cause of action is entitled to summary judgment.” Little v. … City of Keller v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • in Re FamilyLink Treatment Services, Inc.

    Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Dec 7, 2022

    See In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 166 S.W.3d 732, 737 (Tex. 2005) (“A case becomes moot if a controversy ceases to exist between the parties at any stage of the legal proceedings, including the appeal.”). … Corp., 227 S.W.3d 652, 655 (Tex. 2007) (concluding that subsequent trial court order did not moot mandamus proceeding because discovery issue was “capable of repetition in a manner that evades review”); Davis v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Marian Swanson and Claudia Romain v. Stouffer & Associates, LLP

    Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · May 30, 2014

    See Sherman v. … Wagner & Brown, Ltd. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.