Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,798 results
1.36s
Larry Don Atkins v. Texas Department of Motor Vehicles
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Nov 18, 2021
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-19-00964-CV Larry Don Atkins, Appellant v. … We must presume that the Board’s order is supported by substantial evidence, and the appellant has the burden of overcoming this presumption. Austin Chevrolet, Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAxel M. Sigmar and Lucia S. Sigmar v. Alan Anderson and Jo Ellen Anderson
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Oct 27, 2006
LEXIS 2599, at *7 ; see also Biaza v. Simon , 879 S.W.2d 349, 353 (Tex. App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 1994, writ denied). Only void judgments can be collaterally attacked. Browning v. … Barr v. Resolution Trust Corp. , 837 S.W.2d 627, 628 (Tex. 1992); see also Browning v. Prostok , 165 S.W.3d 336, 349 (Tex. 2005); Henderson , 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 2599 , at *17-*18.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Jul 6, 2018
See Enriquez v. State, 429 S.W.2d 141, 145 (Tex. Crim. App. 1968). … See Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238, 239 (1972) (holding unconstitutional the imposition and carrying out of death penalty in Georgia and Texas cases before court); see also Enriquez v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedKirk Wayne McBride v. the City of New Braunfels, and Ray Douglas
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Mar 15, 1995
Reimer v. Scott , 666 S.W.2d 384, 385 (Tex. App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 1984, writ dism'd); Brown v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co. , 449 S.W.2d 93, 97 (Tex. Civ. App.--Fort Worth 1969, no writ). … See Wood v. Texas Farmers Ins. Co. , 593 S.W.2d 777, 782 (Tex. Civ. App.
Cited 0 timesPublishedJohn C. Cangelosi, Jr. v. Texas Water Commission
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Jul 12, 1995
Beaumont Bank, N.A. v. Buller, 806 S.W.2d 223, 226 (Tex. 1991); Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc., 701 S.W.2d 238, 241-42 (Tex. 1985). … Frenzel v. Browning-Ferris Indus., 780 S.W.2d 844, 846 (Tex. App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 1989, no writ).
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Jul 13, 2015
KYLE Austin, Texas Clerk RENT-A-CENTER, INC., Appellant, v. … Chrismon v. Brown, 246 S.W.3d 102, 116 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2007, no pet.). Because the trial court entered no judgment on the cost-of-goods-sold issue, there is no error to address.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAlexander Kosaka v. Hook and Anchor Marine and Watersports, LLC
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Nov 8, 2012
Evid. 408; Brown v. American Transfer & Storage Co., 601 S.W.2d 931, 934–95 (Tex. 1980) (discussing collateral source rule). … Enright, 330 S.W.3d at 402 (citing Patlyek, 149 S.W.3d at 786); see also Kroger Co. v. Brown, 267 S.W.3d 320, 324 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, no pet.)
Cited 0 timesPublishedRafael Francisco Narvaez v. Rita Ortiz Maldonado
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Jan 23, 2004
See Texas Dep't of Transp. v. T. Brown Constructors, Inc. , 947 S.W.2d 655, 659 (Tex. App.--Austin 1997, writ denied) (bill of review that fails as direct attack may constitute collateral attack). … Herrera , 11 S.W.3d at 927 ; French v. Brown , 424 S.W.2d 893, 895 (Tex. 1967). One with an available appeal who fails to pursue that remedy is not entitled to seek relief by bill of review. Rizk v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Jul 12, 1995
Universal v. State TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-94-00681-CV Universal Underwriters Insurance Company, Appellant v. … The other statutory defendants are: Attorney General Dan Morales; then State Treasurer Kay Bailey Hutchison; State Board of Insurance; then State Board of Insurance Members Claire Korioth, Richard Reynolds, and Allene Evans
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas A&M University Texas A&M University System Dr. Jerry Gaston And Eugene Ray v. Don Thompson
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Dec 18, 2003
P. 166a(c); Cathey v. Booth, 900 S.W.2d 339, 341 (Tex. 1995); Nixon v. Mr. Prop. Mgmt. Co., 690 S.W.2d 546, 548-49 (Tex. 1985). … See Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 (1972). The presumption that employment in Texas is at will is difficult to overcome. See Montgomery County Hosp. Dist. v. Brown, 965 S.W.2d 501, 502 (Tex.1998).
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · May 1, 2009
Compare Duerr v. Brown, 262 S.W.3d 63, 69-70 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, no pet.) … Duerr v. Brown, 262 S.W.3d 63, 70 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, no pet.). “The plaintiff must present a claim that goes beyond what traditionally has been characterized as legal malpractice.”
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Jul 1, 2009
He has petitioned this Court for a writ of mandamus to compel the judge of the 353rd District Court of Travis County, to consider and rule on motions pending in cause number D-1-GN-07-001319, Patrick Earl Conely v. … Texas Board of Criminal Justice, et al. We are not told the nature of this lawsuit, in which Conely is representing himself.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBarbara Ann Doughty v. Stephen William Doughty
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Apr 21, 2006
Kimsey v. Kimsey, 965 S.W.2d 690, 704 (Tex. App. … Murff v. Murff, 615 S.W.2d 696, 698-99 (Tex. 1981). A trial court abuses its discretion if the property division is manifestly unjust and unfair, O’Carolan v. Hopper, 71 S.W.3d 529, 532 (Tex. App.
Cited 0 timesPublishedRafael Francisco Narvaez v. Rita Ortiz Maldonado
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Jan 23, 2004
See Texas Dep’t of Transp. v. T. Brown Constructors, Inc., 947 S.W.2d 655, 659 (Tex. App.—Austin 1997, writ denied) (bill of review that fails as direct attack may constitute collateral attack). … Herrera, 11 S.W.3d at 927; French v. Brown, 424 S.W.2d 893, 895 (Tex. 1967). One with an available appeal who fails to pursue that remedy is not entitled to seek relief by bill of review. Rizk v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCarl MacK Burford, Jr. v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Aug 29, 2003
A search of the car uncovered, among other things, small plastic bags containing a white powdery substance and a brown granular substance that tests later revealed were cocaine and methamphetamine. … See Guzman v. State, 955 S.W.2d 85, 89 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997).
Cited 0 timesPublishedCarl MacK Burford, Jr. v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Aug 29, 2003
A search of the car uncovered, among other things, small plastic bags containing a white powdery substance and a brown granular substance that tests later revealed were cocaine and methamphetamine. … See Guzman v. State , 955 S.W.2d 85, 89 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997).
Cited 0 timesPublishedJuan Herrera v. Smith Farms, Inc.
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Mar 15, 1995
Herrera v. Smith Farms, Inc. TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-94-00622-CV Juan Herrera, Appellant v. … A board had been placed under one of the front supports to prevent it from sinking into the muddy ground. The board broke, causing the trailer to fall to one side and the trailer's cargo to shift.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSteven Paul Wilson v. Charles C. Dorbandt
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Feb 12, 2015
Willis v. Maverick, 760 S.W. 2d 642,644 {Tex. 1988). Plaintiffs alleged events occurred in 2009 and 2010. … Code, Sec. 73.001, 73.005; See, Brown v. Swett & Crawford of Texas, Inc., 178 S.W.3d 373, 382 (Tex. App.-Houston [1 Page 3 of 5 Dist.] 2005, no pet.).
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Mar 2, 2000
The machines also fold the fabric for rolling on boards of approximately thirty inches in length. … This view was rejected by this Court in Texas Citrus Exchange v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Feb 12, 1998
Dinnery v. State , 592 S.W.2d 343, 352-53 (Tex. Crim. App. 1980) (opinion on rehearing). Point of error one is overruled. … Brown v. State , 943 S.W.2d 35, 36 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). Appellant's contention to the contrary is without merit. Point of error two is overruled. The judgment of conviction is affirmed. J.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna