Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,798 results
1.69s
250 S.W.3d 490 · Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Apr 14, 2008
Id. at 405-06 (citing Brown v. State, 911 S.W.2d 744, 747 (Tex.Crim.App.1995)). … Brown, 911 S.W.2d at 748 . In evaluating the sufficiency of the evidence, an appellate court must consider all the evidence in the record, including accomplice testimony. McDuff v.
Cited 124 timesPublishedTexas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Sep 22, 2023
; International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, District Council 88; Philip Lawhon; Robin Drake; Riley Drake; David Ervin; Leeroy Hamilton; and Sean Ingram, Appellants v. … Bastrop Independent School District; Ashley Mutschink, in his Official Capacity as President of the Board of Trustees; et al., Appellees FROM THE 423RD DISTRICT COURT OF BASTROP COUNTY NO
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Apr 21, 2010
(citing Hanson v. Denckla , 357 U.S. 235, 253 (1958)). … See Schlobohm v. Schapiro , 784 S.W.2d 355, 357 (Tex. 1990).
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Apr 21, 2010
(citing Hanson v. Denckla, 357 U.S. 235, 253 (1958)). … See Schlobohm v. Schapiro, 784 S.W.2d 355, 357 (Tex. 1990).
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Jan 8, 2016
JUDGMENT RENDERED JANUARY 8, 2016 NO. 03-15-00077-CV Gregory Joe Wickline, Appellant v. … Board of Regents for the Oklahoma Agricultural and Mechanical Colleges, acting for and on behalf of Oklahoma State University; and James Michael Holder, in his individual capacity and in his capacity as Vice President
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Jun 30, 1999
The Board also adopted a preamble which was incorporated into the Board's order of January 30, 1997. … At the Board meeting on January 30, 1997, the Board adopted the revised rule and the reimbursement rates for state and non-state owned ICF/MRs.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Jul 25, 2014
D-1-DC-12-301138, HONORABLE CLIFFORD BROWN, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION This is an appeal pursuant to Anders v. … App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). 4 See McCoy v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Aug 7, 2013
County of Cameron v. Brown, 80 S.W.3d 549, 555 (Tex. 2002). … v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedIn Re Devon Dubois Burrus v. the State of Texas
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Feb 26, 2025
Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 1992). This burden includes providing the reviewing court with a sufficient record establishing his right to mandamus relief. … In re Brown, 343 S.W.3d 803, 804 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011). Under that statute, a convicted defendant is entitled to credit for time spent confined “in jail for the case” after arrest and until sentencing. Tex. Code Crim.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Sep 24, 2015
See Vasquez, Docket No. 095-R3-188 (citing Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 (1972)). … CODE § 11.201(d) & BOARD POLICY BJA (LEGAL).
Cited 0 timesPublishedJ-W Power Company v. Irion County Appraisal District
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Dec 5, 2024
Auth. v. … Appraisal Dist. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedZenith Star Insurance Company v. Glen Wilkerson and Davis and Wilkerson, P.C.
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Mar 25, 2004
See also Brown v. … which party was appealing Board’s decision); Sanchez v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedZenith Star Insurance Company v. Glen Wilkerson and Davis and Wilkerson, P.C.
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Mar 25, 2004
See also Brown v. McMillan Material Co. , 108 S.W.2d 914, 916 (Tex. Civ. App. … which party was appealing Board's decision); Sanchez v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMichael Anthony Cardiel v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Jun 7, 2012
See Brown v. State, 986 S.W.2d 50, 53 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1999, no pet.) … See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988); Anders, 386 U.S. at 743-44; High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811-13 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684, 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Gainous v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedChris Pearson and Service Tech, Inc. v. Visual Innovations Company, Inc.
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Apr 6, 2006
See NCAA v. … Dist. v. Brown, 965 S.W.2d 501, 501-02 (Tex. 1998). This case is, however, distinguishable.
Cited 0 timesPublishedChris Pearson and Service Tech, Inc. v. Visual Innovations Company, Inc.
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Apr 6, 2006
See NCAA v. … Dist. v. Brown , 965 S.W.2d 501, 501-02 (Tex. 1998). This case is, however, distinguishable.
Cited 0 timesPublishedHays County Water Planning Partnership and Erin Foster v. Hays County, Texas
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Feb 15, 2001
See Cox Enters., Inc. v. Board of Trustees of the Austin ISD , 706 S.W.2d 956, 960 (Tex. 1986); Save Our Springs Alliance, Inc. v. Lowry , 934 S.W.2d 161, 162 (Tex. App. … Id . at 447-48 (citing Hunt v. Washington State Apple Adver. Comm'n , 432 U.S. 333, 343 (1977), and incorporating standing analysis adopted in Board of Water Eng'rs v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedReverend Homer Green v. United Pentecostal Church International
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · May 3, 1995
Orthodox Diocese v. Milivojevich , 426 U.S. 696, 708-09, 724-25 (1976). … We are persuaded by the Fifth Circuit's holding in Simpson v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Jan 14, 2015
App. - Austin 2011, pet. ref'd) 12, 13, 16 Brown v. State. 270 S.W.3d 564, 570 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008).... 8 Cantu V. State. 939 S.W.2d 627, 633 (Tex. Crim. … Brown v. State. 270 S.W.3d 564. 570 TTex. Crim. App. 20081 If the argument falls in one or more of these categories then the argument is not improper.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Feb 3, 2005
If the owner is unsuccessful in his protest to the appraisal review board, the owner may appeal the board's order to the district court. Id. § 42.01(1)(A). … The district court will then review the board's order de novo. C.I.T. Leasing, 115 S.W.3d at 266; City of Fort Worth v. Pastusek Indus., 48 S.W.3d 366, 370 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2001, no pet.).
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna