Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
8,253 results
0.71s
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · Dec 19, 2013
See Calderon v. State, 950 S.W.2d 121, 139–40 (Tex. App. … Justice Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Sharp, and Brown.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · Dec 4, 2008
McAfee v. State , No. 01-00-00470-CR , 2001 WL 619543 , (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] , 2001, pet. ref’d) (not designated for publication). Our mandate issued on July18, 2002 . … Ann. art. 11.07, § 3 (Vernon Supp. 2008); Board of Pardons & Paroles ex rel. Keene v. Court of Appeals for the Eighth District , 910 S.W.2d 481, 483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995).
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · May 2, 2013
(citing Tex. v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730, 738–39, 103 S. Ct. 1535, 1541 (1983)). … Laura Carter Higley Justice Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Brown. Do not publish. TEX. R. APP.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSES Products, Inc. v. Aroma Classique, LLC and Michal R. Avraham
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · Jun 6, 2013
Vinmar Trade Fin., Ltd. v. Util. Trailers de Mex., S.A. de C.V., 336 S.W.3d 664 672 (Tex. App.―Houston [1st Dist.] 2010, no pet.) (citing Exxon Corp. v. Choo, 881 S.W.2d 301, 302 (Tex. 1994)). … Harvey Brown Justice Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Brown. 15
Cited 0 timesPublishedFDP Corp. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.
749 S.W.2d 569 · Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · Apr 7, 1988
The Act does not define “actual damages,” but it has been construed to mean common law damages, Brown v. … White v. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co., 651 S.W.2d 260 ; Martin v. Lou Poliquin Enterprises, 696 S.W.2d at 187 .
Reversed in part, on other grounds by Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. FDP Corp., 34 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 690 (1991)Cited 6 timesPublished827 S.W.2d 487 · Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · Mar 12, 1992
V, § 18(b). … Appellants claim this case is controlled by Seagler v.
Cited 4 timesPublished186 S.W.3d 55 · Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · Oct 20, 2005
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. at 744 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 ; Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d at 511 . … Vidaurri, 49 S.W.3d at 883 (quoting Brown v. State, 943 S.W.2d 35, 41 (Tex.Crim.App.1997)). While the exact wording has changed to some degree, the ultimate purpose of the Rule has not. " 2 .
Cited 4 timesPublishedTexas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · Jul 18, 2002
Duff v. Yelin , 751 S.W.2d 175, 176 (Tex. 1988). … Silvas v. Ghiatas , 954 S.W.2d 50, 53 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 1997, writ denied). Appellants relied on the expert testimony of Dr. Marable, a board certified neurologist, as competent summary judgment evidence.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · Jul 18, 2017
Wilson v. State, 40 S.W.3d 192, 200 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2001, no pet.) (citing Wilson v. State, 976 S.W.2d 254, 257 n.4 (Tex. App.—Waco 1998, no pet.)). … Judge’s signature: /s/ Jane Bland Acting individually Acting for the Court Before Justices Higley, Bland, and Brown. Date: July 18, 2017
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · Jun 5, 2014
Zachry Co. v. … P. 45; Smith v. Brown, 51 S.W.3d 376, 381 (Tex. App.— 19 Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, pet. denied).
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · Sep 27, 2016
P. 25.2(d); see Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 613 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). … See Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim.
Cited 0 timesPublishedApolinar Marquez Camposano v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · Oct 11, 2016
See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). … PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Keyes, and Brown. Do not publish. TEX. R. APP.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · Sep 27, 2016
P. 25.2(d); see Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 613 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). … See Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim.
Cited 0 timesPublishedJoseph Lester Robinson v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · Nov 21, 2012
See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–28 (Tex. Crim. … Jane Bland Justice Panel consists of Justices Bland, Massengale, and Brown. Do not publish. TEX. R. APP.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMalcomson Road Utility District v. Frank George Newsom
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · May 20, 2005
See Ludewig v. Houston Pipeline Co. , 773 S.W.2d 610, 614 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1989, writ denied); Bradford v. Magnolia Pipe Line Co. , 262 S.W.2d 242, 246 (Tex. Civ. App.—Eastland 1953, no writ); Meaney v. … HCFCD did not require that the pond be placed on Newsom’s property, but Ray Zobel, president of the District’s board, testified that the board selected Newsom’s property for the pond because that location would have allowed
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · Jul 24, 2014
See generally Carroll v. … See Landers v. E. Tex.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDaniel William Block v. Kimberly Denise Block
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · Aug 12, 2004
See Jones v. Ray Ins. Agency , 59 S.W.3d 739, 753 (Tex. App. … Although Biddle is not binding precedent, we note that, in reaching its holding, the court relied on Brown v. Brown , 15 Cal. 3d 838 , 126 Cal.
Cited 0 timesPublishedRalph D. HUSTON and Christina Huston, Appellants, v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Appellee
359 S.W.3d 679 · Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · Oct 27, 2011
OPINION HARVEY BROWN, Justice. This appeal arises from the dismissal of a counterclaim filed by Ralph and Christina Huston in the underlying proceeding brought by U.S. … Bradt v. Sebek, 14 S.W.3d 756, 762 (Tex. App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2000, pet. denied).
Cited 29 timesPublishedBrooks, Charles David v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · May 23, 2002
Opinion issued May 23, 2002 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-01-00388-CR CHARLES DAVID BROOKS, Appellant V. … Brown v. State , 960 S.W.2d 772, 777 (Tex. App.-Dallas 1997, pet. ref'd). In this case, a pretrial hearing on the issue of appellant's competency was held, and the expert, Dr.
Cited 0 timesPublishedin Re Stanford Development Corporation
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · Jan 29, 2009
Kellogg Brown & Root, 166 S.W.3d at 739 . Stanford argues that the fifth theory for binding nonsignatories--equitable estoppel--applies in this case. … Anglin Co. v. Tipps , 842 S.W.2d 266, 271 (Tex. 1992)).
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna