Case law

Tyson

District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Feb 2, 2026

(“COGIC”); (2) the General Board of the Church of God in Christ (“General Board”); and (3) Jonathan Saffold, Jr. (ECF No. 9-1 at PageID 93.) … Brown v. Greene Cnty. Vocational Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ., 717 F. Supp. 3d 689, 694 (S.D. Ohio 2024) (citation omitted).

Lawyers Title Insurance v. United American Bank of Memphis

21 F. Supp. 2d 785 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Aug 19, 1998

(Browning dep., July 21, 1994, at 198; see also Grusin Aff. ¶4). … Browning. 5 .

Franklin v. Shelby County Schools

District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Nov 22, 2021

Terrence Brown, Ms. Gennerette, Katrina Creswell, Scott Holdcomb, Lisa White, Antonio Burt, or Dr. Sharon Griffin and that he had not recorded any conversations with SCBE employees Renea Brown and Dr. John Norris. … Brown and Ray to begin an investigation into Memphis Virtual School. This instruction came immediately after Plaintiff told Dr. Brown that Plaintiff was suing the district.

Abraham v. United States

272 F. Supp. 807 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Aug 29, 1967

OPINION ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BAILEY BROWN, Chief Judge. ' Plaintiffs, George G. … On October 30, 1950, the Board of Directors of Abraham Bros, voted to liquidate the corporation in not more than two years, and notice of the adoption of the plan of liquidation was given to the Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Paschall v. Memphis Light, Gas and Water Division

District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Feb 27, 2025

Abbott v. Crown Motor Co., 348 F.3d 537, 542 (6th Cir. 2003) (citing Swierkiewicz v. Sorema, 534 U.S. 506, 511 (2002). … (ECF No. 30 at PageID 1693 (quoting Booker v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Co., 879 F.2d 1304, 1312 (6th Cir. 1989).)

Manning v. Fort Deposit Bank

619 F. Supp. 1327 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Oct 15, 1985

See, e.g., City of Kingsport v. … Compare Tormo v.

United States v. Johnson

940 F. Supp. 167 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Sep 16, 1996

United States v. Blankenship, 954 F.2d 1224, 1229 (6th Cir.1992) (quoting Brown, 915 F.2d at 226 ). … Hill v.

Burnett v. Tyco Corp.

932 F. Supp. 1039 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Jul 19, 1996

See Hurley v. Florida Steel Corp., No. 94-1065, 1995 WL 901890 , 1995 WL 877498 (W.D.Tenn. Sept. 9, 1994 and Oct. 11, 1995); Scarborough v. Brown Group, Inc., 935 F.Supp. 954 (W.D.Tenn.1995). … In support of her position, Plaintiff relies on Anderson v. Yarp Restaurant, Inc., No. 94 CIV 7543, 1996 WL 271891 (S.D.N.Y. May 21, 1996), Brown v.

Townsend v. TN Dept of Corrections

District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Oct 2, 2020

Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989); see also Brown v. Matauszak, 415 F. App’x 608, 612, 613 (6th Cir. … LaFountain v. Harry, 716 F.3d 944, 951 (6th Cir. 2013); see also Brown v. R.I., 511 F.

Security Bank & Trust Co. v. Tarlton

294 F. 698 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Dec 18, 1923

Gage & Co. v. Bell (D. C. Tenn.) 124 Fed. 371 , 10 Am. Bankr. Rep. 696; 2 Collier on Bankruptcy (13th Ed.) p. 1230 (b). … A. 351 ); or a debtor may importune his creditors to proceed and the adjudication still be valid (Matter of Brown [C. C. Mo.] 7 Am. Bankr.

Resolution Trust Corp. v. Wood

870 F. Supp. 797 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Nov 30, 1994

The Board shall have exclusive power and jurisdiction to appoint a conservator or receiver. … If, in the opinion of the Board, a ground for the appointment of a conservator or receiver as herein provided exists, the Board is authorized to appoint ex parte and without notice a conservator or receiver for the association

Estate of Sanders v. Jones

362 F. Supp. 3d 463 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Jan 24, 2019

See , e.g. , Brown v. … v.

Westport Insurance v. Wilkes & McHugh, P.A.

264 F.R.D. 368 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Oct 23, 2009

Brown for depositions. *371 1. … Brown for deposition.

Poe v. Gist

District Court, W.D. Tennessee · May 29, 2019

Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989); see also Brown v. Matauszak, 415 F. App’x 608, 612, 613 (6th Cir. … LaFountain v. Harry, 716 F.3d 944, 951 (6th Cir. 2013); see also Brown v. R.I., 511 F.

Royer v. Southern Health Plan, Inc.

857 F. Supp. 42 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Jun 30, 1994

In the instant case, the parties agree that the standard for review is that forth in Perry v. … Brown, including the letters of Drs. Harrington and Lemonds, the Court concludes that the plaintiffs’ claim was properly denied under the pre-existing condition clause contained in the contract.

Taylor v. Council On Quality and Leadership

District Court, W.D. Tennessee · May 28, 2019

Brown v. Board of Educ., 47 F. Supp. 3d 665, 674 (W.D. Tenn. 2014); see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). … Brown, 47 F. Supp. 3d at 674. Moreover, “Overly general objections do not satisfy the objection requirement.” Spencer v. Bouchard, 449 F.3d 721, 725 (6th Cir. 2006).

Bordages

District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Mar 23, 2026

Brown v. Matauszak, 415 F. App’x 608, 615 (6th Cir. 2011). But a court need not offer a chance to amend when it is “patently obvious” that the plaintiff cannot prevail on the newly alleged facts. See id. … See Brown, F. App’x at 614; Sampson v. Garrett, 917 F.3d 880, 882 (6th Cir. 2019) (directing district court to dismiss claims without prejudice under Heck).

White v. Long

District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Feb 23, 2024

Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989); see also Brown v. Matauszak, 415 F. … v.

United States ex rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. An Easement & Right-of-Way Over 1.0 Acre of Land

248 F. Supp. 702 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Dec 23, 1965

BAILEY BROWN, District Judge. This is a review of an award made by commissioners in connection with a T.V.A. condemnation of an easement for a power line. … V. A. v. An Easement and Right of Way etc., 182 F.Supp. 899 (M.D.Tenn.1960) and United States ex rel. T. V. A. v. Baker, W.D. Tenn., No. 1293, unreported). The owner relies heavily on Cementerio Buxeda, Inc. v.

Vickers v. City of Memphis

368 F. Supp. 2d 842 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · May 5, 2005

In Petersen v. Department of Interior, 71 M.S.P.R. 227 (1996), however, the Merit Systems Protection Board (“MSPB”) concluded that harassment based upon prior military service violated the USERRA. … The parties also point to Miller v.