Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterstnwd

1,953 results

1.07s

  • Lawler v. Hardeman County, Tennessee

    District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Sep 29, 2022

    In Daubert v. … (citing Garner v. Memphis Police Dep’t, 8 F.3d 358, 365 (6th Cir. 1993))); North v. Cuyahoga Cnty., 754 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Koenigs L.L.C. v. City of Savannah, Tennessee

    District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Jul 18, 2019

    Alexander v. Carter for Byrd, 733 F. App’x 256, 261 (6th Cir. 2018) (quoting Haddad v. Sec’y, U.S. Dept. of Homeland Sec., 610 F. App’x 567, 568-69 (6th Cir. 2015) (citing Brown v. VHS of Mich., Inc., 545 F. … Deming v. Jackson-Madison County Gen. Hosp. Dist., 553 F. Supp. 2d 914, 930 (W.D. Tenn. 2008) (citing Marler v. State Board of Optometry, 102 F.3d 1453, 1456 (8th Cir. 1996)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Wilberto Vallecilla Gamboa v. Warden Harrison

    District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Aug 21, 2026

    See Prieto v. Gluch, 913 F.2d 1159, 1162–63 (6th Cir. 1990); Garcia-Echaverria v. … See Witham v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Parker v. West Carroll Special School District

    District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Jan 8, 2021

    Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989). … Shepherd v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • DHS

    District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Apr 24, 2026

    Smith v. … Buenrostro-Mendez v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Alco Standard Corp. v. Tennessee Valley Authority

    597 F. Supp. 133 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Oct 22, 1984

    Acme Highway Products Corp. v. D.S. Brown Co., 473 F.2d 849, 850 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 824 , 94 S.Ct. 125 , 38 L.Ed.2d 57 (1973). … Rengo Co. v. Molins Machine Co., 657 F.2d at 549 . As the Supreme Court stated in Webster Loom Co. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Shaw v. Habitat for Humanity

    District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Jun 2, 2025

    Corp. v. Smith, 802 F. App’x 938, 945 (6th Cir. 2020) (citing Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007)); see also Vandiver v. Vasbinder, 416 F. … While courts are properly charged with protecting the rights of all who come before it, that responsibility does not encompass advising litigants as to what legal theories they should pursue.”); Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Ray v. Rose

    392 F. Supp. 601 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Feb 27, 1975

    Ray v. Rose, 491 F.2d at page 290 , citing Dukes v. Warden, 406 U.S. 250 , 92 S.Ct. 1551 , 32 L.Ed.2d 45 (1972). … In Tollett v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Mutters-Edelman v. Approximately 132 Acres of Land (Parcel ID 141 02300 000) Located on Chewalla Road, Ramer (McNairy County), Tennessee

    District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Sep 12, 2024

    Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989); see also Brown v. Matauszak, 415 F. App'x 608, 613 (6th Cir. 2011) (“[A] court cannot create a claim which [a plaintiff] has not spelled out in his pleading.” … Fransioli v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Perez-Oxlaj

    District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Jan 27, 2026

    The Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) upheld this new policy in the case of Matter of Yajure Hurtado, 29 I. & N. Dec. 216 (BIA 2025). … To do so, he would need to appeal his denial of a bond hearing to the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Restrepo-Guerra

    District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Jan 27, 2026

    Id.; Godinez-Lopez v. Ladwig, No. 25-2962, 2025 WL 3047889, at *1 (W.D. Tenn. Oct. 31, 2025). The Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) upheld this new policy in the case of Matter of Yajure Hurtado, 29 I. & N. … To do so, he would need to appeal his denial of a bond hearing to the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Firefighters United for Fairness v. City of Memphis

    362 F. Supp. 2d 963 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Mar 28, 2005

    Brown, Lt. James Beasley, Lt. Everett R. Frazier, Lt. Elbert Jackson, Lt. Larry L. Harris, Lt. Richard Holliday, Lt. Ulysses Jones, Jr., Lt. Ronald Moore, and Private Sandra Richards. 1 2. … Sutherland v. Michigan Dept. of Treasury, 344 F.3d 603, 614 (6th Cir.2003).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hutson v. Gibson

    District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Jun 30, 2020

    Howell v. Farris, 655 F. App’x 349, 351 (6th Cir. 2016) (quoting Eidson v. Tenn. Dep’t of Children’s Servs., 510 F.3d 631, 634 (6th Cir. 2007)); see also Wilson v. Garcia, 471 U.S. 261, 275-76 (1985). … Brown v. Morgan, 209 F.3d 595, 596 (6th Cir. 2000); see also Surles v. Anderson, 678 F.2d 452, 458 (6th Cir. 2012); Waters v. Evans, 105 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Bock v. UT Medical Group, Inc.

    924 F. Supp. 2d 923 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Feb 12, 2013

    In Searle v. … In Coyle v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Reed v. Tyson Foods, Inc.

    District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Nov 22, 2024

    Brown v. Bd. of Educ. of Shelby Cty. Sch., 47 F. Supp. 3d 665, 674 (W.D. Tenn. 2014) (citing Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985)). … See SEC v. Jarkesy, 144 S.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Wooden v. Lee

    District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Sep 11, 2024

    This regime was clearly constitutional under Smith [v. Does, 538 U.S. 84 (2003)] and Cutshall [v. Sundquist, 193 F.3d 466 (6th Cir. 1999)]. … To elide the statute, the district court must look at each restriction, compare it to the guidance issued in Smith, Cutshall, [Doe v.] Bredesen, [507 F.3d 998 (6th Cir. 2007)] and [Does #1-5 v.]

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Carmona-Hernandez

    District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Feb 6, 2026

    Id.; Godinez-Lopez v. Ladwig, No. 25-2962, 2025 WL 3047889, at *1 (W.D. Tenn. Oct. 31, 2025). The Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) upheld this new policy in the case of Matter of Yajure Hurtado, 29 I. & N. … To do so, he would need to appeal his denial of a bond hearing to the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Morales-Morales

    District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Feb 6, 2026

    Id.; Godinez-Lopez v. Ladwig, No. 25-2962, 2025 WL 3047889, at *1 (W.D. Tenn. Oct. 31, 2025). The Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) upheld this new policy in the case of Matter of Yajure Hurtado, 29 I. & N. … To do so, he would need to appeal his denial of a bond hearing to the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Anderson v. Metro By T-Mobile

    District Court, W.D. Tennessee · May 28, 2024

    Williams v. Curtin, 631 F.3d 380, 383 (2011) (quoting Martin v. Overton, 391 F.3d 710, 712 (6th Cir. 2004)). But even pro se complaints must satisfy the plausibility standard. See Pilgrim v. … See Brown v. Matauszak, 415 F. App’x 608, 612, 613 (6th Cir. 2011). Courts also “have no obligation to act as counsel or paralegal to pro se litigants.” Thomas v. Romanowski, 362 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Presley v. Jones

    District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Oct 31, 2019

    See Jenkins v. Hardeman Cnty., Tenn., No. 13- 2054, 2013 WL 5593048, at *6 (W.D. Tenn. Oct. 10, 2013) (citing Brown v. Cuyahoga Cnty., Ohio, 517 F. App’x 431, 433 (6th Cir. 2013)). … Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 837-38 (1994); see Brooks v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.