Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterstnwd

1,953 results

1.03s

  • Dowdy v. Shelby County Sheriff's Office

    District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Jun 7, 2021

    Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989); see also Brown v. Matauszak, 415 F. App’x 608, 612–613 (6th Cir. … (quoting Brown, 415 F. App’x at 614). Here, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff leave to amend the dismissed claims in his complaint.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Mattox v. United States of America, Inc.

    District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Aug 26, 2019

    Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989). … Pliler v. Ford, 542 U.S. 225, 231 (2004) (“[D]istrict judges have no obligation to act as counsel or paralegal to pro se litigants.”); Brown v. Matauszak, 415 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Mattox v. United States of America, Inc.

    District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Aug 26, 2019

    Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989). … Pliler v. Ford, 542 U.S. 225, 231 (2004) (“[D]istrict judges have no obligation to act as counsel or paralegal to pro se litigants.”); Brown v. Matauszak, 415 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hall v. Baptist Memorial Health Care Corp.

    27 F. Supp. 2d 1029 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Nov 23, 1998

    In E.E.O.C. v. … See Boyd v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Patton v. Shelby County Sheriff's Dept.

    District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Aug 31, 2021

    Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989); see also Brown v. Matauszak, 415 F. … (quoting Brown, 415 F. App’x at 614). The Court already granted Plaintiff the opportunity to amend his complaint and rescreened it under the PLRA.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Nguyen v. Boylan

    District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Nov 5, 2021

    Brown v. City of Memphis, 440 F. Supp. 2d 868, 872 (W.D. Tenn. 2006). … Brown v. Chapman, 814 F.3d 447, 463 (6th Cir. 2016) (internal quotations omitted).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Mobley v. Dept. of Justice

    District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Feb 21, 2024

    Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989); see also Brown v. Matauszak, 415 F. App’x 608, 612, 613 (6th Cir. … Id. at *2-3; see also Brown v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, No. 6:22-097-DCR, 2023 WL 3934674, at *4 (E.D. Ky.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Mobley v. Dept. of Justice

    District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Feb 21, 2024

    Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989); see also Brown v. Matauszak, 415 F. App’x 608, 612, 613 (6th Cir. … Id. at *2-3; see also Brown v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, No. 6:22-097-DCR, 2023 WL 3934674, at *4 (E.D. Ky.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • P&G Construction Consultants, LLC., as Assignee of Adam Food, Inc. v. Nationwide General Insurance Company

    District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Oct 18, 2021

    .”); Polston v. Millennium Outdoors, LLC, No. 6:16- CV-16, 2017 WL 878230, at *1 (E.D. Ky. Mar. 6, 2017); Bass v. Leatherwood, No. 13-2882-JDT- tmp, 2014 WL 3952833, at *5 (W.D. Tenn. Aug. 13, 2014); Harmer v. … Id. at 353–54 (quoting Starks v. Browning, 20 S.W.3d 645, 652 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Bullwinkel v. United States Department of Energy

    899 F. Supp. 2d 712 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Aug 13, 2012

    Dugle v. Norfolk S. Ry. … Gary Bullwinkel raised concerns about that decision with me, a member of the TVA Board of Directors, and a senior TVA manager. 8.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Jacobs v. MEMPHIS CONVENTION AND VISITORS BUREAU

    710 F. Supp. 2d 663 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · May 10, 2010

    The Florida Prepaid Decision In arguing against the constitutionality of the Copyright Remedy Clarification Act, the Department relies upon the decision in Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board v. … Furthermore, the plaintiff in National Association of Boards of Pharmacy v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Sanders v. Sanders

    District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Jun 26, 2025

    Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 47 (1957). … Brown, 891 F. 2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989). A pro se complaint must still “contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” Barnett v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Pacheco v. Martinez

    District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Sep 26, 2025

    Geier v. Sundquist, 372 F.3d 784, 791 (6th Cir. 2004) (quoting Reed v. Rhodes, 179 F.3d 453, 471 (6th Cir. 1999)). … Yellowbook Inc. v. Brandeberry, 708 F.3d 837, 848 (6th Cir. 2013) (quoting Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 437 (1983)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Freeman v. Sullivan

    954 F. Supp. 2d 730 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Jun 17, 2013

    Brown, 891 F.2d 591 , 594 (6th Cir.1989) A pro se complaint must still “contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” Barnett v. … Brown, 891 F.2d 591 , 594 (6th Cir.1989) A pro se complaint must still “contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” Barnett v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Weisfeld v. FEDEX CORPORATION and SUBSIDIARIES

    District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Oct 21, 2022

    WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION BEN WEISFELD, RANDY ALEXANDER, ) LINDA TUCKER, KEVIN BROWN … Mayfield v. Boeing Co., No. 3:06- 0883, 2007 WL 9683907 (M.D. Tenn. June 4, 2007); One World Botanicals v. Gulf Coast Nutritionals, 987 F. Supp. 317 (D.N.J. 1997).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Baker v. Wilson

    District Court, W.D. Tennessee · May 19, 2023

    Glanton v. Lord, 183 S.W.3d 391, 393 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005); see also Providence Baptist Church v. … Davis v. Lifetime Capital, Inc., 560 F. App’x 477, 495 (6th Cir. 2014) (quoting Grutter v. Bollinger, 188 F.3d 394, 400 (6th Cir. 1999)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Thomas

    District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Feb 25, 2026

    Brookings, 389 F.3d at 617 (citing Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325, 334 (1983); Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 547, 554–55 (1967)). … Brown v. Matauszak, 415 F. App’x 608, 613 (6th Cir. 2011); Pliler v. Ford, 542 U.S. 225, 231 (2004); see also Young Bok Song v. Gipson, 423 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Ward v. Shelby County

    District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Sep 18, 2024

    Co. v. Univ. Nat'l Bank of Lawrence, 910 F.3d 270, 284 (6th Cir. 2018). … (ECF No. 235 at PageID 3512; cf Pierce v. Atchison Topeka & Santa Fe Ry.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Carruthers

    District Court, W.D. Tennessee · May 20, 2026

    Nelson v. … See Wesson v. Shoop, 17 F.4th 700, 705 (6th Cir. 2021) (citation omitted). In habeas proceedings, federal courts do not reweigh evidence or reevaluate the credibility of witnesses. See Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Cathey v. CITY OF MEMPHIS (MEMPHIS POLICE DEPARTMENT)

    District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Sep 30, 2024

    Brown v. Bd. of Educ. of Shelby Cnty. Sch., 47 F. Supp. 3d 665, 678 (W.D. Tenn. 2014) (quoting U.S. Const. amend. XIV, § 1). Due process claims can be either substantive or procedural. Id. … Cathey also described a series of hearings conducted by the Memphis Permits Office and the City of Memphis Transportation Board. (Id. at PageID 274 –75.)

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.