Case law

Sundrop Bottling Company, Inc. v. Fiji Water Company, LLC

District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Aug 19, 2021

(citing Cates v. Electric Power Board of the Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, 655 S.W.2d 166, 170 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1983)). … erred in dismissing breach of contract claim on summary judgment because a material issue of fact existed as to whether the conversations and conduct of the parties established an exchange of consideration); Est. of Brown

McGee v. Gay

District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Oct 5, 2021

Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989), nor can the court “create a claim which [a plaintiff] has not spelled out in his pleading.” Brown v. Matauszak, 415 F. App’x 608, 613 (6th Cir. 2011) (quoting Clark v. … See King v.

Grubbs v. Bradley

552 F. Supp. 1052 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Aug 13, 1982

In Estelle v. … See Reed v. Cleveland Board of Education, 607 F.2d 737 (6th Cir.1979).

Cutshall v. Sundquist

980 F. Supp. 928 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Sep 25, 1997

Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 569-70 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2705 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). … .); Doe v.

Foundation Building Materials, LLC v. Ironline Metals, LLC

District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Aug 25, 2025

(quoting Food & Drug Admin. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 133 (2000)). … Id. at 1222 (citing Morris v. Nuzzo, 718 F.3d 660, 665 (7th Cir. 2013)).

Ramos v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Jul 25, 2022

Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007) (quoting Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 106 (1976)). … Brown v. Cracker Barrel Rest., 22 F. App’x 577, 578 (6th Cir. 2001) (citing Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989)).

Maney v. Unknown

District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Jan 3, 2025

Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 31 (1992). … App’x 579, 580 (6th Cir. 2001) (citing Franklin v. Rose, 765 F.2d 82, 85 (6th Cir. 1985). And pro se litigants are not exempt from the requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Brown v. Matauszak, 415 F.

Jones v. Fly

District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Sep 22, 2020

Sandin, 515 U.S. at 486- 87; see also Jones v. Baker, 155 F.3d 810, 812 (6th Cir. 1998); Rimmer-Bey v. Brown, 62 F.3d 789, 790-91 (6th Cir. 1995). … Brown, 62 F.3d 789, 790-91 (6 Cir. 1995) (stating that, after Sandin, it became clear that mandatory language in prison regulations does not create a liberty interest protected by the due process clause); Upshaw v.

Young v. Bernhard MCC, LLC

District Court, M.D. Tennessee · May 12, 2022

Brown v. VHS of Michigan, Inc., 545 F. App’x 368, 373 (6th Cir. 2013); see also 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3. Employees engage in “protected activity” when they oppose practices “made unlawful under Title VII.” Brown, 545 F. … Seeger v. Cincinnati Bell Tel. Co., LLC, 681 F.3d 274, 285 (6th Cir. 2012) (quoting Bell v. Prefix, Inc., 321 Fed. App’x 423, 431 (6th Cir.2009)).

Williams v. Smith

District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Nov 13, 2020

Assocs., L.L.C. v. Mattel, Inc., 552 U.S. 576, 582 (2008); see also Hale v. Morgan Stanley, No. 3:19-cv-229, 2020 WL 1233772, at *2-3 (S.D. … v.

Maney

District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Oct 30, 2025

Payne v. Secretary of Treasury, 73 F. App’x 836, 837 (6th Cir. 2003).And pro se litigants are not exempt from the requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Brown v. Matauszak, 415 F. … Lucky Brand Dungarees, Inc. v. Marcel Fashions Grp., 590 U.S. 405, 412 (2020). See Brownback v.

O'GUINN v. Dutton

870 F. Supp. 779 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Mar 31, 1993

Moran v. … See Jackson v.

Brock v. National Health Corp.

667 F. Supp. 557 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Mar 31, 1987

In Marshall v. … In McComb v.

United States v. White

808 F. Supp. 586 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Dec 2, 1992

In United States v. … In United States v.

R.K. v. Lee

District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Oct 22, 2021

v=t3mB3jcxTws (last visited Oct. 15, 2021))). … Nken v.

Novatne v. Elrod

District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Apr 3, 2020

Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989), nor can the Court “create a claim which [a plaintiff] has not spelled out in his pleading.” Brown v. Matauszak, 415 F. App’x 608, 613 (6th Cir. 2011) (quoting Clark v. … Los Angeles Cty., Cal. v. Humphries, 562 U.S. 29, 39 (2010); see City of Canton, Ohio v.

Crockett v. DCSO Medical Dept.

District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Sep 8, 2020

Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989), nor can the Court “create a claim which [a plaintiff] has not spelled out in his pleading.” Brown v. Matauszak, 415 F. App’x 608, 613 (6th Cir. 2011) (quoting Clark v. … Clark v. Johnston, 413 F. App’x 804, 815 (6th Cir. 2011) (citing Bell v.

Bowling

District Court, M.D. Tennessee · May 4, 2026

Motors, LLC v. FCA US, LLC, 44 F.4th 548, 563 (6th Cir. 2022). … Motors, 44 F.4th at 563 (quoting Clark v. United States, 764 F.3d 653, 661 (6th Cir. 2014)).

Medlin v. City of Algood

355 F. Supp. 3d 707 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Jan 16, 2019

Brown v. City of Niota , 214 F.3d 718 , 722-23 (6th Cir. 2000). … See , Crosby v.

Hull v. CSX Transportation, Inc.

District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Mar 31, 2025

The arbitrators, who were organized into panels of the National Railroad Adjustment Board and Public Law Board 3 Six individuals who were named as plaintiffs in either the original Complaint or one of the proposed … Allen v. Zurich Ins. Co., 667 F.2d 1162, 1166 (4th Cir. 1982). CSX argues that the findings of the PLB and National Railroad Adjustment Board should be given issue-preclusive effect.