Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterstnmd

2,304 results

1.69s

  • Shin v. Sun Poultry Services Inc.

    District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Jun 2, 2025

    Brown v. Cracker Barrel Rest., 22 F. App’x 577, 578 (6th Cir. 2001) (citing Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989)). C. … Operating Eng’rs Local 324 Health Care Plan v. G & W Constr. Co., 783 F.3d 1045, 1050 (6th Cir. 2015); see also Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Zarrow v. Robertson County Sheriff's Department

    District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Jul 23, 2025

    Williams v. Curtin, 631 F.3d 380, 383 (6th Cir. 2011) (quoting Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 681 (2009)). … Porter v. Brown, 289 Fed. Appx. 114, 116 (6th Cir. 2008). “[T]he accrual date of a § 1983 cause of action is a question of federal law that is not resolved by reference to state law.” Wallace v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Mireille M. Lee v. The Vanderbilt University

    District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Dec 4, 2025

    Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. … Brown, 710 F.2d at 1176. This is true even if neither party objects to the motion. Id.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Central States Southeast & Southwest Areas Health & Welfare & Pension Funds v. Columbia Motor Express, Inc. (In Re Columbia Motor Express, Inc.)

    33 B.R. 389 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Aug 29, 1983

    See Flint Hills Foods, Inc. v. … See National Labor Relations Board v. Bildisco and Bildisco, 682 F.2d 72 (3rd Cir.1982) cert. granted - U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 784 , 74 L.Ed.2d 992 (1983). 10 . Unless the holder of the claim agrees otherwise.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Mageo v. Mays

    District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Jul 1, 2021

    Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989), nor can the Court “create a claim which [a plaintiff] has not spelled out in his pleading.” Brown v. Matauszak, 415 F. App’x 608, 613 (6th Cir. 2011) (quoting Clark v. … Blackmore v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Jennings Ex Rel. Jennings v. Alexander

    518 F. Supp. 877 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Jun 17, 1981

    N.A.A.C.P. v. … Board of County Commissioners, 614 F.2d 601 (8th Cir. 1980), and Roe v. Casey, 623 F.2d 829 (3rd Cir. 1980). However, neither of these cases is particularly helpful in resolving the question presently before the court.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Kremer v. Reddit, Inc.

    District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Jul 22, 2022

    Operating Eng’rs Local 324 Health Care Plan v. G & W Constr. Co., 783 F.3d 1045, 1050 (6th Cir. 2015); see also Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. … See Wada v. U.S. Secret Serv., 525 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Maney v. Demonic Rasict Discrimination

    District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Jan 3, 2025

    Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 31 (1992). … App’x 579, 580 (6th Cir. 2001) (citing Franklin v. Rose, 765 F.2d 82, 85 (6th Cir. 1985). And pro se litigants are not exempt from the requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Brown v. Matauszak, 415 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Venable v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County

    District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Dec 20, 2019

    In Pickering v. … Gillis v. Miller, 845 F.3d 677, 684 (6th Cir. 2017) (citing Brown v. City of Trenton, 867 F.2d 318, 322 (6th Cir. 1989)); see also Cherry v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Linton Ex Rel. Arnold v. Carney Ex Rel. Kimble

    779 F. Supp. 925 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Apr 23, 1990

    Smith v. Miller, 665 F.2d 172, 179 (7th Cir.1981). … In Guardians Ass’n v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Bostick v. Byrd

    District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Feb 4, 2021

    ) Plaintiff, ) ) NO. 3:20-cv-01041 v. … See Brown v. Matauszak, 415 F. App’x 608, 615 (6th Cir. 2011) (encouraging dismissal with leave to amend in circumstances where it appears possible that the party can overcome his pleading deficiencies).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Mineo v. Transportation Management of Tennessee, Inc.

    694 F. Supp. 417 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Mar 21, 1988

    The grievance proceeded to arbitration, and the arbitration board determined that plaintiff had demonstrated that he had sufficiently recovered to resume work as of October 12, 1984, but not before. … See Burton v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Kennedy v. Hodges

    District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Nov 8, 2019

    See Cleavinger v. Saxner, 474 U.S. 193 (1985) (disciplinary board members protected by qualified immunity); Superintendent v. … Real, 471 U.S. 491, 495-99 (1985) (disciplinary board need not make contemporaneous record of reasons live witnesses for inmate not allowed); Baxter v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Jones v. State of Tennessee Department of Correction

    District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Mar 22, 2022

    Jones v. City of Cincinnati, 521 F.3d 555, 562 (6th Cir. 2008). … See Aces High Coal Sales, Inc. v. Cmty. Bank & Trust, 768 F. App’x 446, 459 (6th Cir. 2019); see also Armatas v. Aultman Health Foundation, No. 5:19-cv-349, 2020 WL 1650841, at *5 (N.D.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Corporate Air Fleet of Tennessee, Inc. v. Gates Learjet, Inc.

    589 F. Supp. 1076 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · May 10, 1984

    See, e.g., Perkins v. Brown, 132 Tenn. 294, 296 , 177 S.W. 1158 ,1159 (1915). … In Nobility Homes of Texas, Inc. v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Mitchell v. State of Tennessee

    District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Nov 16, 2020

    Shane Grp. v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Mich., 825 F.3d 299, 305 (6th Cir. 2016) (alteration omitted) (quoting Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. F.T.C., 710 F.2d 1165, 1179–80 (6th Cir. 1983)). … Tyson v. Regency Nursing, LLC, No. 3:17-CV-91, 2018 WL 632063, at *1 (W.D. Ky.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Phillips v. Lewisburg Police Department

    District Court, M.D. Tennessee · May 21, 2020

    Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989); see also Brown v. Matauszak, 415 F. … Parratt v. Taylor, 451 U.S. 527, 535 (1981) (overruled in part by Daniels v. Williams, 474 U.S. 327, 330 (1986)); Flagg Bros. v. Brooks, 436 U.S. 149, 155-56 (1978); Black v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Maney v. State of TN

    District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Nov 25, 2024

    App’x 579, 580 (6th Cir. 2001) (citing Franklin v. Rose, 765 F.2d 82, 85 (6th Cir. 1985). And pro se litigants are not exempt from the requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Brown v. Matauszak, 415 F. … Kokkonen v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Callahan v. Louisville & Nashville R.

    11 F. 536 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · May 15, 1882

    There is to be but one board of directors, one corps of general officers, and one management. … If it wore necessary to have a precedent for this ruling the case of Railroad Co. v. Harris, 12 Wall. 66 , seems to us to be very much in point.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Moore v. Mount Zion Baptist Church

    District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Sep 10, 2024

    v. Hammervold, 386 F. Supp. 3d 904, 911 (M.D. … Fegley v. Higgins, 19 F.3d 1126, 1134 (6th Cir. 1994) (citation omitted); see also Rembert v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.