Case law

Olvera v. State

806 S.W.2d 546 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 3, 1991

Virginia Pharmacy Board v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc., 425 U.S. 748, 771 , 96 S.Ct. 1817, 1830 , 48 L.Ed.2d 346 (1976). … Perry, 460 U.S. at 46 , 103 S.Ct. at 955 (distinguishing public forum and nonpublic forum); Board of Airport Cotn'rs of Los Angeles v.

Story v. State

107 Tex. Crim. 266 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 18, 1927

Wilson v. State, 290 S. W. 1103 . … Weathered v. State, 272 S. W. 471 ; McRae v. State, 275 S. W. 1067 ; Roark v. State, 276 S. W. 242 ; Berry v. State, 281 S. W. 1057 ; Walker v. State, 281 S. W. 1070 .

Booth v. State

499 S.W.2d 129 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Sep 19, 1973

Brown v. State, 460 S.W.2d 925, 927 (Tex.Cr.App, 1970). … See also, Hay v. State, 472 S.W.2d 157 (Tex.Cr.App., 1971). 3 . See, e. g., Steam v. State, 487 S.W.2d 734, 736 (Tex.Cr.App., 1972) ; Washington v. State, 488 S.W.2d 445, 447 (Tex.Cr.App., 1972) ; Hodge v.

Whitehead v. State

103 Tex. Crim. 78 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 27, 1926

Brown v. State, 112 S. W. 80 ; Glenn v. State, 76 S. W. 757 ; Wesley v. State, 85 S. W. 802 ; Lucas v. State, 95 S. W. 1035 ; Ware v. State, 38 S. W. 198 ; Britton v. State, 37 S. W. 758 .

State v. Terrazas

962 S.W.2d 38 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 4, 1998

See Cain v. *44 State, 947 S.W.2d 262, 264-265 (Tex.Crim.App.1997)(disagreeing with Court of Appeals substantial compliance analysis but deciding the issue of harm); Brown v. … House v. State, 947 S.W.2d 251, 252-253 (Tex.Crim.App.1997).

Hamilton v. State

82 Tex. Crim. 544 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 12, 1917

In Johnson v. State, 42 Texas Crim. … Holder v. State, 81 Texas Crim. Rep., 194 , 194 S. W. Rep., 165 ; Grider v. State, 82 Texas Crim. Rep., 124 , 198 S. W. Rep., 579 .

Butler v. State

54 Tex. Crim. 42 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 13, 1908

Buzard v. Bank of Greenville, 67 Texas, 83 , is cited and relied on to sustain this affirmance. I do not believe it is in point especially as distinguished by the Supreme Court in Kelley Island & Line Transport Co. v. … Rep., 427 ) is distinguishable from, and as Justice Brown did distinguish between it and the Buzard case. “In the Buzard case, Pennington was held to be the agent of Buzard.

Mejia v. State

505 S.W.2d 532 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 30, 1974

See also Kelly v. State, 459 S.W.2d 841 (Tex.Cr.App.1970) and Price v. State, 410 S.W.2d 778 (Tex.Cr.App.1967). … Sierra v. State, 476 S.W.2d 285 (Tex.Cr.App. 1972); Bell v.

Weeks v. State

476 S.W.2d 310 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 26, 1972

In Hamilton v. … See Brown v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 464 S.W.2d 134 ; Garza v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 440 S.W.2d 860 ; Estrada v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 406 S.W. 2d 448 .

Means v. State

153 Tex. Crim. 73 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 22, 1948

A representative of the liquor control board registered in the hotel where appellant was a porter, or bell-boy. Upon going to his room, the inspector asked the appellant to bring him some whisky, which he agreed to do. … Roberts v. State, 144 S. W. 940 ; Watson v. State, 122 S. W. (2d) 311 .

Merkel v. State

75 Tex. Crim. 551 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 9, 1914

Smith v. State, 54 Texas Crim. Rep., 298 ; Logan v. State, 54 Texas Crim. Rep., 74 ; Huddleston v. State, 54 Texas Crim. Rep., 93 ; Brown v. State, 54 Texas Crim. Rep., 121 ; Jones v. State, 54 Texas Crim. … Rep., 507 ; Oates v. State, 56 Texas Crim. Rep., 571 ; Rasor v. State, 57 Texas Crim. Rep., 10 ; Beaver v. State, 63 Texas Crim. Rep., 581 ; Dallas, etc., St. R. Co. v. Chase, 118 S. W. Rep., 783 ; Id. v.

Meador v. State

151 Tex. Crim. 53 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 18, 1947

The officers also saw a dice cup and what is called *56 a “bump board”, against which the dice are thrown. … Weige v. State, 81 Tex. Cr. R. 476 , 196 S. W. 524 ; Simmons v. State, 98 Tex. Cr. R. 421 , 248 S. W. 392 ; Harris v. State, 93 Tex. Cr. R. 544 , 249 S. W. 485 ; Salinas v. State, 113 Tex. Cr. R. 142 , 18 S.

Ex Parte Duncan

42 Tex. Crim. 661 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 24, 1901

Rep., 634 ; Brown on Jur., secs. 109, 110; Ex Parte Lake, 37 Texas Crim. Rep., 656 . … Enc. of Law, 2 ed., p. 36; People v. Lipscomb, 60 N. Y., 559 ; People v. Oyer and Term. Ct., 101 N. Y., 245 , 54 Am. Rep., 691 ; Ex Parte Degener, 30 Texas Crim. App., 566; Holman v.

State Ex Rel. Curry v. Gray

726 S.W.2d 125 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 11, 1987

See Wade v. Mays, 689 S.W.2d 893 (Tex.Cr.App.1985) and Homan v. Hughes, 708 S.W.2d 449 (Tex.Cr.App. 1986), and cases cited therein at 452. See also Whitsitt v. Ramsey, 719 S.W.2d 333 (Tex.Cr.App.1986), Berry v. … Hughes, 710 S.W.2d 600 (Tex.Cr.App.1986), Dickens v. Palmer, 697 S.W.2d 418 (Tex.Cr.App.1985), Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles v. Miller, 590 S.W.2d 142 (Tex.Cr.App.1979), Ordunez v.

Garza, James

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 11, 2014

In People v. … Brown, 71 A.3d 1009, 1016 (Pa. Sup. Ct. 2013) (noting that, in Commonwealth v.

Nicholson v. State

148 Tex. Crim. 37 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 8, 1944

said courts to the effect that no criminal case would be callable — or called— *39 for trial until same had been first set for trial by the trial judge and notice of that setting posted upon what is known as the “bulletin board … While it is true that circumstances may arise whereby an accused may be relieved of a strict application of the diligence rule relative to continuance of cases, as was pointed out in Arnold v. State, 97 Tex. Cr.

Batterbee v. State

537 S.W.2d 12 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 19, 1976

He testified that the deceased’s stomach contained one-half pint of viscid gray, mottled with tan-brown and containing pink particular matter which appeared to be the pink Seconal capsular material. … Self v. State, 513 S.W.2d 832 (Tex.Cr.App.1974). The indictment alleged that the appellant caused the death of Vernon Batter-bee by causing him to swallow secobarbital.

Dean v. State

433 S.W.2d 173 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 30, 1968

As we interpret the Act the seller may be any link in the chain of the selling process or in the words of the Act he is one who performs ‘any act by which a sale is made.’ ” Brown v. … See Cosner v. Hancock, 149 S.W.2d 239, at p. 243 (Tex.Civ.App.—El Paso, 1941); Breeding v. Anderson, 152 Tex. 92 , 254 S.W.2d 377, at p. 380 (1953); Gregory v.

GLOVER, MICHAEL DONELL v. the State of Texas

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 16, 2025

E.g., Brown v. State, 716 S.W.2d 939, 946 (Tex. Crim. App. 1986) (citing Blain v. State, 647 S.W.2d 293, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1983)). … See McCain v. State, 22 S.W.3d 497, 502−03 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000) (citing Thomas v. State, 821 S.W.2d 616, 619−20 (Tex. Crim.

Hooser and Wood v. State

126 Tex. Crim. 428 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 21, 1934

V. Besser, with whom Mr. Hall lived, testified that he saw appellants in an automobile near the house in which the wheat was stored between two and three o’clock in the afternoon of August 9, 1933. … His examination of the truck disclosed that the side boards had raised, which accounted for the loss. Mr. Bailey testified that appellants appeared to be “sweaty and sleepy.”