Case law

Gray v. State

130 Tex. Crim. 289 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 29, 1936

Among the cases cited are Price v. State, 36 Texas Crim. Rep., 144 , 35 S. W., 988 . See also Davis v. State, 100 Texas Crim. Rep., 617 , 272 S. W., 480 ; Anderson v. State, 100 Texas Crim. Rep., 562 , 272 S. … W., 172 ; Perkins v. State, 76 S. W. (2d) 135 .

Townsley v. State

281 S.W. 1054 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 13, 1926

Atwood v. State, 257 S. W. 563 , 96 Tex. Cr. R. 249 ; Block v. Kearney, 64 P. 267 , 6 Cal. Unrep. 660 ; Reed v. State, 46 N. E. 135 , 147 Ind. 41 ; Courtney v. State, 32 N. E. 335 , 5 Ind. App. 356 ; Scott v. … In support of this proposition appellant refers us to Stacy v. State, 86 S. W. 327 , 48 Tex. Cr. R. 95 ; Brown v. State, 112 S. W. 80 , 54 Tex. Cr. R. 121 ; Garcia v. State, 156 S. W. 939 , 70 Tex. Cr. R. 485 ; House v.

Arnold v. State

853 S.W.2d 543 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 7, 1993

Arnold v. State, 778 S.W.2d 172 (Tex.App. … See Bynum v. State, 767 S.W.2d 769, 772 (Tex.Cr.App.1989); Guerrero v. State, 820 S.W.2d 378, 382 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1991, pet. ref’d); compare Olvera v.

Fleming v. State

62 Tex. Crim. 653 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 23, 1911

Brown, 124 U.S. 385 ; Manhattan Co. v. Blake, 148 U.S. 412 . This check, as plead in the indictment, was evidently not a deposit, nor did it come within either class of deposits. … The board of directors reached the conclusion, and so advised Mr. Fleming at the time, that the bank was solvent, and that the business could safely go on.

State Ex Rel. Rosenthal v. Poe

98 S.W.3d 194 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 12, 2003

In Boykin v. … See Brown v. State, 943 S.W.2d 35, 37-38 (Tex.Crim.App.1997); Tex. Gov’t.Code, § 311.023. . Relying upon standing concepts associated with errors under Batson v.

Newton v. State

784 S.W.2d 689 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 21, 1990

The record reflects that veniremember Emma Rivera worked for the "State Parole Board” in an unstated capacity. … Jones v. State, 725 S.W.2d 770 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1987, p.d.r. ref'd.).

Green v. State

555 S.W.2d 738 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Sep 21, 1977

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR REHEARING BROWN, Commissioner. Appellant’s motion for rehearing is granted. Our prior opinion is withdrawn. … Barker v. Wingo, supra; McKinney v. State, supra.

Molina, Arnulfo

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 1, 2003

Brown v. State , 911 S.W.2d 744, 747 (Tex. Cr. App. 1995). 15. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 38.03. 16. Jackson v. Virginia , 443 U.S. 307, 317-18 (1979) (citing In re Winship , 397 U.S. 358 (1970)). 17. Ibid. ; Griffin v. … LEXIS 6320 at *5 (citing Hyett v. State , 58 S.W.2d 826, 830 (Tex. App. - Houston [14 th Dist.] 2001, no pet.); Martinets v. State , 884 S.W.2d 185, 188 (Tex. App. - Austin 1994, no pet.); Villarreal v.

Lopez v. State

630 S.W.2d 936 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 14, 1982

Carey v. State, 537 S.W.2d 757, 759 (Tex.Cr.App.1976). In Furtick v. … Brown v. State, 523 S.W.2d 238 (Tex.Cr.App.1975); Carlile v. State, 451 S.W.2d 511 (Tex.Cr.App.1970). It is clear from the record that Rita Espino-sa was not a witness in the case.

Ex Parte Roemer

215 S.W.3d 887 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 28, 2007

Lehigh Valley Coal Co. v. Yensavage, 218 F. 547, 553 (2d Cir.1914). . See, e.g., United States v. … Brown, 333 U.S. 18, 25-26 , 68 S.Ct. 376 , 92 L.Ed. 442 (1948) ("The canon in favor of strict construction is not an inexorable command to override common sense and evident statutory purpose.”); SEC v. C.M.

Moussazadeh, Ex Parte Max

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 15, 2012

Hill v. Lockhart , 474 U.S. 52, 56 (1985)(quoting McMann v. … See Mitschke v. State , 129 S.W.3d 130, 135 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004). Parole attainment, on the other hand, is not governed by statute and is granted at the discretion of the parole board.

VAUGHAN AND SONS INC. v. State

737 S.W.2d 805 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Sep 16, 1987

See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Beneficial Finance Co., 275 N.E.2d 33 (1971); People v. Lee Myles Corp., 53 A.D.2d 873 , 385 N.Y.S.2d 339 (1976); State v. … See and compare Goldschmitt v.

Morales, Jose Manuel

357 S.W.3d 1 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 9, 2011

State, 984 S.W.2d 245, 250 (Tex.Crim.App.1998); an instruction that "intent or knowledge may be inferred by acts done or words spoken,” Brown v. … See State v. Elias, 339 S.W.3d 667, 679 (Tex.Crim.App.2011) (court of appeals's disposition of one issue can obviate the need to address a different issue); State v.

Ex Parte Empey

757 S.W.2d 771 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Sep 14, 1988

The better starting point, however, is Ex parte Brooks, 722 S.W.2d 140 (Tex.Cr.App.1986), for it is an interpretation of the seminal decision of this Court in Polk v. … By then the motion had been granted without a semblance of due process, called for by, e.g., Ex parte Brown, 477 S.W.2d 552, at 554 (Tex.Cr.App.1972). .

Bustamante v. State

106 S.W.3d 738 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 4, 2003

Several cases involving unauthorized communications, covered in the same new trial rule as the receipt of other evidence, have not distinguished between new trial and mistrial situations. 20 In Brown v. … Moody v. State, 827 S.W.2d 875, 899-900 (Tex.Crim.App.1992); Robinson v. State, 851 S.W.2d 216, 230 (Tex.Crim.App.1991); Williams v.

Earhart v. State

823 S.W.2d 607 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Sep 18, 1991

The only item missing from the Kirtland residence was a brown towel, and the complainant was nowhere to be found. … V.

McMillan, Tanya Marie Warrell

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 1, 2024

Chaidez v. United States, 568 U.S. 342, 347 (2013) (quoting Lambrix v. … The State also notes additional court of appeals cases that did not apply the Pue rule: Lee v. State, 582 S.W.3d 356, 365–66 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2018, pet. ref'd); Brown v. State, 508 S.W.3d 453, 460 (Tex. App.

Guillory v. State

400 S.W.2d 751 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 2, 1966

Riley v. State, 168 Tex.Cr.R. 417 , 328 S.W.2d 306 ; Edmond v. State, 169 Tex.Cr.R. 637 , 336 S.W.2d 946 . … Torres v. State, 169 Tex.Cr.R. 113 , 331 S.W.2d 929 ; Salcido v. State, 167 Tex.Cr.R. 173 , 319 S.W.2d 329 ; Napier v. State, 166 Tex.Cr.R. 361 , 314 S.W.2d 102 ; Roberson v. State, 160 Tex.Cr.R. 381 , 271 S.W.2d 663 .

Haynes, Larry Glenn

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 30, 2008

See Rutledge v. … Compare State v.

Stephens, Zena Collins

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 15, 2021

It was long ago held, in Brady v. … Board of Water Engineers v.