Case law

Chenowith v. State

50 Tex. Crim. 238 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 25, 1906

Ex parte Conley, supra; Boone v. State, 10 Texas Crim. App., 418; Prather v. State, 12 Texas Crim. App., 401; Akin v. State, 14 Texas Crim. App., 142; Donaldson v. State, 15 Texas Crim. App., 25; Stallworth v. … State v. Bank of Mo., 45 Mo., 528 ; Peo v. Phœnix Bank, 24 Wend., 431 ; Brown v. Mayor of New York, 63 N. Y., 239 . *244 In re Van Antwerp, 56 N. Y., 261 . To the same effect is Day Land & Cattle Co. v.

Ex Parte Frailey

146 Tex. Crim. 557 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 19, 1944

some offense, and have been adjudged insane in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, may be discharged from the asylum at any time upon the recommendation of the superintendent, approved by the board … See Wilson v. State, 149 S. W. 117 . The judgment of the trial court remanding relator to the custody of the sheriff, and refusing bail pending this appeal was correct, and said judgment is hereby affirmed.

Molina, Arnulfo

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 1, 2003

Brown v. State , 911 S.W.2d 744, 747 (Tex. Cr. App. 1995). 15. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 38.03. 16. Jackson v. Virginia , 443 U.S. 307, 317-18 (1979) (citing In re Winship , 397 U.S. 358 (1970)). 17. Ibid. ; Griffin v. … LEXIS 6320 at *5 (citing Hyett v. State , 58 S.W.2d 826, 830 (Tex. App. - Houston [14 th Dist.] 2001, no pet.); Martinets v. State , 884 S.W.2d 185, 188 (Tex. App. - Austin 1994, no pet.); Villarreal v.

Bustamante v. State

106 S.W.3d 738 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 4, 2003

Several cases involving unauthorized communications, covered in the same new trial rule as the receipt of other evidence, have not distinguished between new trial and mistrial situations. 20 In Brown v. … Moody v. State, 827 S.W.2d 875, 899-900 (Tex.Crim.App.1992); Robinson v. State, 851 S.W.2d 216, 230 (Tex.Crim.App.1991); Williams v.

State Ex Rel. Rosenthal v. Poe

98 S.W.3d 194 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 12, 2003

In Boykin v. … See Brown v. State, 943 S.W.2d 35, 37-38 (Tex.Crim.App.1997); Tex. Gov’t.Code, § 311.023. . Relying upon standing concepts associated with errors under Batson v.

Masquelette v. State

579 S.W.2d 478 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 21, 1979

Beall Medical Surgical Clinic and Hospital, Inc. v. State Board of Health, 364 S.W.2d 755 (Tex.Civ.App.-Dallas, 1963), and cases there cited. … In Williams v.

Ex Parte Empey

757 S.W.2d 771 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Sep 14, 1988

The better starting point, however, is Ex parte Brooks, 722 S.W.2d 140 (Tex.Cr.App.1986), for it is an interpretation of the seminal decision of this Court in Polk v. … By then the motion had been granted without a semblance of due process, called for by, e.g., Ex parte Brown, 477 S.W.2d 552, at 554 (Tex.Cr.App.1972). .

Ex Parte Sanderson

152 Tex. Crim. 180 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 9, 1948

Cases from other jurisdictions which appear in point here are Aderhold v. Perry, 59 Fed. (2d) 379; Carroll v. Zerbst, 76 Fed. (2d) 961; Robbins v. Gries, 277 Mich. 15 , 268 N. … W. 794 ; Re Nelson, 185 Cal. 594 , 197 Pac. 947 ; Ex parte Taylor, 13 Pac. (2d) 906 ; Stephens v.

Linder v. State

94 Tex. Crim. 316 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 9, 1922

got in front of her in the ear and placed his hand under her clothing on her knee; that she was struggling with him during all this time and finally got her feet out over the door of the car and slid out on the running board … Ross v. State, 60 Texas Crim. Rep., 547 , 132 S. W. Rep., 793 ; Lawson v. State, 17 Texas Crim. App., 302; Wood v. State, 80 Texas Crim. Rep., 398 , 189 S. W. Rep., 474 ; Jennings v. State, 80 Texas Crim.

Mize v. State

115 Tex. Crim. 102 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 11, 1930

The reception of this testimony was obnoxious to a rule of evidence which has often been applied, as is illustrated by the decisions of this court in Brown v. State, 289 S. W. 386 ; Reich v. State, 13 S. … W. (2d) 697 ; Widener v. State, 5 S. W. (2d) 138 ; Wright v. State, 140 S. W. 1105 .

Jordan v. State

36 S.W.3d 871 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 17, 2001

Boykin v. State, 818 S.W.2d 782 , 785-786 & 786 n. 4 (Tex.Crim.App.1991). . Id. . Tex. Gov’t.Code, § 311.023; Brown v. State, 943 S.W.2d 35, 38 (Tex.Crim.App.1997). . … Woolsey v. State, 166 Tex. Crim. 447 , 314 S.W.2d 298, 300 (1958).

Evangelos Pagonis v. Catherine Thomas

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 22, 2015

App. 1991) ............................... 6 Brown v. Cockrell, No. 07-03-00139-CV, 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 2131, at *5-6 (Tex.App.—Amarillo Mar. 21, 2005) (mem. op.) .............................. 7 City of Waco v. … P. 506(g). 15 Black's Law Dictionary 496 (9th ed. 2009); Brown v. Cockrell, No. 07-03-00139-CV, 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 2131, at *5-6 (Tex.App.—Amarillo Mar. 21, 2005) (mem. op.)

Ex Parte Bynum

772 S.W.2d 113 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 31, 1989

.; Nixon v. State, 572 S.W.2d 699 (Tex.Cr.App.1978) and cases cited therein. … Copies of this opinion will be sent to the Texas Department of Corrections and the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles. BERCHELMAN, J., dissents.

Ex Parte Roemer

215 S.W.3d 887 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 28, 2007

Lehigh Valley Coal Co. v. Yensavage, 218 F. 547, 553 (2d Cir.1914). . See, e.g., United States v. … Brown, 333 U.S. 18, 25-26 , 68 S.Ct. 376 , 92 L.Ed. 442 (1948) ("The canon in favor of strict construction is not an inexorable command to override common sense and evident statutory purpose.”); SEC v. C.M.

Skinner, Henry Watkins

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 5, 2022

Skinner v. … These known head-hair standards ranged from light brown (for Elwin), brown to dark brown (for Randy), and light reddish brown to reddish brown (for Twila).

Mabry, Ex Parte Andrew Michael

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 9, 2004

Spann v. State, ___ S.W.3d ___ (Tex. Crim. App. No. 74,722, delivered April 21, 2004). Copies of this opinion shall be sent to TDCJ - CID and the Board of Pardons and Paroles. Johnson, J.

McKnight v. State

164 Tex. Crim. 155 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 21, 1956

In McKnight v. … Under the evidence and the holding in McKnight v.

Moore v. State

882 S.W.2d 844 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 29, 1994

Green, 682 S.W.2d at 294 ; Brown v. State, 523 S.W.2d 238 (Tex.Crim.App.1975). Our sequestration rale is no longer discretionary with the trial court. … See Hernandez v. State, 791 S.W.2d 301, 306 (Tex.App. — Corpus Christi 1990, pet. ref'd.); Hendley v. State, 783 S.W.2d 750, 752 (Tex.App. — Houston [1st Dist] 1990, no pet.); Barnhill v.

Cox v. State

523 S.W.2d 695 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 28, 1975

American Plant Food Corporation v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 508 S.W.2d 598 ; Terry v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 517 S.W.2d 554 ; Peterson v. State, 508 S.W.2d 844 . In Shappley v. … Wright testified that he was a Senior Examiner with the State Securities Board, and outlined his duties and his qualifications and expertise with respect to the regulation of securities. He was also an attorney-at-law.

Freeman v. State

556 S.W.2d 287 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 18, 1977

Appellant, in his 19th ground, complains of the trial court’s “unduly restricting the defense voir dire” of prospective jurors Marsh, Lott, Thompson, Brown, and McCarthy. … In view of such arguments, the court, over written objection of appellant, gave an additional written instruction to the jury that it should not consider any possible action of the Board of Pardons or the Governor, nor how