Case law

Adams v. State

66 Tex. Crim. 220 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 13, 1911

In the case of Ennis v. … (Taylor v. Delaney), 2 Caines, Cas. Ev., 143; (In re Yates), 2 Johns. (N. Y.), 317; (In re Theriat), 2 Hill (N. Y.), 380; (In re Brown), 21 Wend. (N. Y.), 316. No such intention is manifested in the present instance.”

Ex Parte Niswanger

335 S.W.3d 611 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 16, 2011

I then asked the suspect what he had in the brown cardboard box that was on the table, he said that it was just some stuff that he needed. I asked him if I could look in the brown box. He gave me consent. … Boyett, 368 S.W.2d at 771 ; Walker v. State, 89 Tex.Crim. 180 , 229 S.W. 853, 854 (1921); Rice v. State, 195 S.W.3d 876, 881-82 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2006, pet. ref'd); Dietz v. State, 62 S.W.3d 335, 340 (Tex.App.

Sobieski v. State

126 Tex. Crim. 405 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 7, 1934

It has been held by this court in the case of Wilson v. State, 223 S. W., 217 , Crausby v. State, 26 S. W. (2d) 247 , and Brown v. State, 51 S. … Rep., 535 ; Thornley v. State, 36 Texas Crim. Rep., 118 .

Jemison and Jackson v. State

79 Tex. Crim. 313 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 29, 1916

Under the cases of Bailey v. State, 18 Texas Crim. App., 426; Frazier v. State, 18 Texas Crim. App., 434; Conner v. State, 24 Texas Crim. App., 245; McDonald v. State, 70 Tex.Crim. Rep., 156 S.W. Rep., 209 ; Williams v. … Flores v. State, 60 Tex. Crim. 25 , 129 S.W. Rep., 1111 ; Wallace v. State, 81 S.W. Rep., 966 ; Barnard v. State, 86 S.W. Rep., 760 ; Shaw v. State, 57 Tex. Crim. 474 , 123 S.W. Rep., 691 ; Williams v.

Newton v. State

94 Tex. Crim. 382 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 22, 1922

Anderson v. State, 91 Texas Crim. Rep., 183 , 238 S. W. Rep., 221 . … We again suggest that where appropriate charges on accomplice evidence approved in Brown v. State, 57 Texas Crim. Rep., 578 , 124 S. W. Rep., 101 and in Oats v. State, 67 Texas Crim. Rep., 496 , 149 S. W.

Smith, Patrick Bernard

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 8, 2003

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. 74,575 PATRICK BERNARD SMITH, Appellant v. … Rivera v. State, 89 S.W.3d 55, 59 (Tex. Crim. App. 2002). 7. Id. 8. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 64.03 (Vernon 2003) . 9. Rivera, 89 S.W.3d at 59 ; Kutzner v. State , 75 S.W.3d 427, 439 (Tex. Crim. App. 2002). 10.

Duke v. State

147 Tex. Crim. 533 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 21, 1944

v. … In the case of Upton v. State, 20 S.

Weinn, Corbett K.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 30, 2010

WEINN, Appellant v. … Brown v. Ohio , 432 U.S. 161, 165 (1977).

Weinn, Corbett K.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 30, 2010

Constitution, Amendment V. … Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161, 165 (1977).

Sims v. State

116 Tex. Crim. 247 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 26, 1930

Lancaster for board. He was then asked if he knew Mr. Lancaster’s signature. State’s counsel said: “We object — we understand that he is presenting an affidavit for a warrant.” … See Barkman v. State, 52 S. W. 71 ; Brittain v. State, 36 Tex. Cr. R. 406 ; Criner v. State, 89 Tex. Cr. R. 226 ; Redding v. State, 95 Tex. Cr. R. 641 . The motion is overruled. Overruled. Hawkins, J., absent.

Villafranco, Jesse Jr.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 20, 2021

When you were at the place where they took your video and you were drawing on the dry erase board? A. Yes, sir. Q. Okay. Now, do you remember then that you described that Isaiah had touched you? A. Yes, sir. Q. … Van Patten, 552 U.S. 120, 124-25 (2008) (presumption of prejudice arises from complete denial of counsel at a critical stage); Roe v. Flores-Ortega, 528 U.S. 470, 483 (2000) (same); Schmidt v.

Wall, Roger Morgan

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 18, 2006

PD-1631-04 ROGER MORGAN WALL, Appellant v. … In State v.

Derichsweiler, Mark Alan

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 26, 2011

(internal quotation marks omitted); Brown v. Texas , 443 U.S. 47, 51 (1979) (same). 26. United States v. Sokolow , supra ; Crain v. State , supra , at 52. See Terry v. … Terry v. Ohio , supra . 28. United States v.

Adams v. State

172 Tex. Crim. 130 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 29, 1961

Van Arsdale v. State, 149 Texas Cr. Rep. 639 , 198 S.W. 2d 271 . … The case of Polk v. State, 157 Texas Cr.

Swain, Mario Rashad

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 2, 2005

She testified that appellant kept items in his car such as a wrench and a brown glass bottle containing a substance that he said would "put people to sleep." … Sonnier v. State, 913 S.W.2d 511, 516-17 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995); King v. State, 953 S.W.2d 266, 271 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997).

Morales, Jose Manuel

357 S.W.3d 1 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 9, 2011

State, 984 S.W.2d 245, 250 (Tex.Crim.App.1998); an instruction that "intent or knowledge may be inferred by acts done or words spoken,” Brown v. … See State v. Elias, 339 S.W.3d 667, 679 (Tex.Crim.App.2011) (court of appeals's disposition of one issue can obviate the need to address a different issue); State v.

Littrell v. State

271 S.W.3d 273 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 15, 2008

Littrell v. State, No. 07-05-0282-CR, 2007 WL 2162990 (Tex.App.-Amarillo, delivered July 25, 2007). . Id., slip op. at *3. . Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161, 164 , 97 S.Ct. 2221 , 53 L.Ed.2d 187 (1977). . … Garza v.

Cowsert v. State

154 Tex. Crim. 479 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 15, 1950

Beasley v. State, 144 Tex. Cr. R. 369 , 162 S. W. 2d 964 . … Reliance is had on Turner v. State, 138 Tex. Cr. R. 228 , 135 S. W. 2d 488 , which is admittedly a similar situation.

Chenowith v. State

50 Tex. Crim. 238 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 25, 1906

Ex parte Conley, supra; Boone v. State, 10 Texas Crim. App., 418; Prather v. State, 12 Texas Crim. App., 401; Akin v. State, 14 Texas Crim. App., 142; Donaldson v. State, 15 Texas Crim. App., 25; Stallworth v. … State v. Bank of Mo., 45 Mo., 528 ; Peo v. Phœnix Bank, 24 Wend., 431 ; Brown v. Mayor of New York, 63 N. Y., 239 . *244 In re Van Antwerp, 56 N. Y., 261 . To the same effect is Day Land & Cattle Co. v.

Ex Parte Frailey

146 Tex. Crim. 557 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 19, 1944

some offense, and have been adjudged insane in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, may be discharged from the asylum at any time upon the recommendation of the superintendent, approved by the board … See Wilson v. State, 149 S. W. 117 . The judgment of the trial court remanding relator to the custody of the sheriff, and refusing bail pending this appeal was correct, and said judgment is hereby affirmed.