Case law

Mercado v. State

718 S.W.2d 291 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 22, 1986

In Browning v. State, 720 S.W.2d 504 (Tex.Cr.App.1986), we held that the court’s charge therein was an improper comment on the weight of the evidence. … Hatton v. State, 31 Tex.Cr.R. 586 , 21 S.W. 679 (1893).

Barnes v. State

90 Tex. Crim. 51 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 16, 1921

A little further down the road appellant’s car was again stopped, and when Reeder tried to drive pást it, appellant ran to Reeder’s car, jumped on the running board, and with an oath de- *53 mantled that the car be stopped … Colter v. State, 37 Texas Crim. Rep., 284 ; Polk, et al. v. State, 35 Texas Crim. Rep., 495 ; Rodgers v. State, 36 Texas Crim. Rep., 563 .

Leahy v. State

111 Tex. Crim. 570 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 24, 1928

See also Brown v. State, 57 Tex. Crim. Rep. 576. Stovall v. State, 104 Tex. Crim. Rep. 217. … State v. Ganger, 73 Mont. 194 . The following language occurs in the case of Brown v. State, 3 Tex. Crim.

Vaughn v. State

116 Tex. Crim. 230 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 12, 1930

Butler got out on the running board and broke several jars on the side of the car. The parties also threw jars from the car. They were finally overtaken and arrested after having been pursued for several hundred yards. … Yarbrough v. State, 12 S. W. (2d) 803 . In the companion case of Butler v. State, the evidence was held sufficient. The judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.

Bush v. State

773 S.W.2d 297 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 17, 1989

Bush v. State, id., at 44. The court of appeals then quoted Brown v. … Whitemore v. State, 570 S.W.2d 889 (Tex.Cr.App.1977) (on rehearing).

Samuel v. State

688 S.W.2d 492 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 20, 1985

Hicks v. … See Whart.Cr.Ev. 680; U.S. v. Brown, 4 Cranch, C.C. 508 , Fed.Cas. No. 14,660; Bob v. State, 32 Ala. 560 ; Noonan v. State, 1 Smedes & M. 562.

Skinner, Gregory Allen

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 7, 2018

P ROC. art. 11.07, § 4(a)(1); Ex parte Brown, 205 S.W.3d 538, 545 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). … See Brady v.

Ex Parte Curtis

568 S.W.2d 363 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jul 19, 1978

. *366 Relying principally on Holt v. … Finally, we call to the attention of the respondent and the relator the language of Brown v.

Linton, Audrey R.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 14, 2009

LINTON, Appellant v. … Interpretation certificates are issued by the National Registry of Interpreters for the Deaf (RID) or the Board for Evaluation of Interpreters (BEI).

McLain v. State

383 S.W.2d 407 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 27, 1964

S Tex.Jur.2d 68, Sec. 41; Press v. State, 168 Tex.Cr.R. 1 , 322 S.W.2d 525 ; Erwin v. State, 171 Tex.Cr.R. 323 , 350 S.W.2d 199 . … Moreno v. State, 170 Tex.Cr.R. 410 , 341 S.W.2d 455 . However, the appellant complained of the refusal of her request for a copy of Wilburn’s statement in his amended motion for a new trial.

Sewell v. State

367 S.W.2d 349 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 27, 1963

Blum v. State, 166 Tex.Cr.R. 541 , 317 S.W.2d 931 ; Moreno v. State, 170 Tex.Cr.R. 410 , 341 S.W.2d 455 ; Perdue v. State, 171 Tex.Cr.R. 332 , 350 S.W.2d 203 ; Martinez v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 354 S.W.2d 936 ; Pruitt v. … State, 164 Tex.Cr.R. 460 , 301 S.W.2d 166 ); or exhibited or read from or used to question the witness in the jury’s presence (Board v. State, 122 Tex.Cr.R. 487 , 56 S.W.2d 464 ; Bailey v.

Doyle v. State

65 Tex. Crim. 300 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 10, 1912

This question is so fully discussed in Slack v. State, 61 Tex. Crim. 372 , 136 S.W. Rep., 1073 , especially in the judgment on the motion for rehearing, and in Dankworth v. The State, 61 Tex.Crim. Rep., 136 S.W. … statement of facts is withdrawn, but when we consider the statement of facts it shows that appellant was engaged in the practice of dentistry; that he applied for license to practice dentistry, and was denied license by the board

Lewis v. State

59 Tex. Crim. 51 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 16, 1910

It is urged in brief of counsel for appellant that this charge was in effect criticised and condemned in the cases of Mitchell v. State, 50 Texas Crim. Rep., 180 , and Watson v. State, 50 Texas Crim. Rep., 171 . … In the case of Mitchell v.

Morales v. State

587 S.W.2d 418 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Sep 19, 1979

Morales needs to be seen by the Review Board for Manifest Dangerousness at the Rusk State Hospital before transfer to our outlying hospitals is undertaken. … Perryman v. State, 507 S.W.2d 541 (Tex.Cr.App.); Paul v. State, 544 S.W.2d 668 (Tex.Cr.App.); and Thomas v. State, 562 S.W.2d 240 (Tex.Cr.App.).

Ex Parte Jones

957 S.W.2d 849 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 18, 1997

Boykin v. State, 818 S.W.2d 782, 785 (Tex.Cr.App.1991). … Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles as well as the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional and Paroles Divisions.

Linton v. State

275 S.W.3d 493 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 14, 2009

Interpretation certificates are issued by the National Registry of Interpreters for the Deaf (RID) or the Board for Evaluation of Interpreters (BEI). … Certification at Level V or above is preferred for intermediary interpretation. . Signed English is a word-for-word translation of English. ASL is a separate language that differs from English in vocabulary and grammar.

Simer v. State

62 Tex. Crim. 514 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 31, 1911

Proc., sec. 485; and he cites United States v. Keen, 1 McLean, 429 ; The State v. Jackson, 30 Me., 29; United States v. Brown, 3 McLean, 233 ; United States v. Howard, 3 Sumn., 12 ; The State v. … Noble, 15 Me., 476; Dick v. The State, 30 Miss., 631 ; United States v. Foye, 1 Curt., 364 ; Commonwealth v. Hope, 22 Pick., 1 ; Hill v. The State, 41 Texas, 253 ; Gorman v. The State, 42 Texas, 221 ; Collins v.

Hedrick v. State

40 Tex. Crim. 532 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 10, 1899

Briscoe v. State, 32 Texas Crim. Rep., 411 ; Banks v. State, 13 Texas Crim. App., 182; Sims v. State, 10 Texas Crim. App., 132; Preston v. State, 8 Texas Crim. App., 30; Wills. Circ. … Appellant’s fourth assignment is the same as his second, except the question was asked Ben Brown instead of Squire Ham, as in that instance.

Moore v. State

85 Tex. Crim. 403 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 4, 1919

Hudson v. State, 28 Texas Crim. App., 338; McKinney v. State, 31 Texas Crim. Rep., 583 . … Ev., Sec. 429; Weaver v. State, 68 Texas Crim. Rep., 214 , 150 S. W. Rep., 785 ; Crockett v. State, 40 Texas Crim. Rep., 178 ; Brown v. State, 38 Texas Crim. Rep., 597 .

Clapp v. State

639 S.W.2d 949 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 20, 1982

Texas National Guard Armory Board v. McCraw, 132 Tex. 613 , 126 S.W.2d 627 (1939); Collingsworth County v. Allred, 120 Tex. 473 , 40 S.W.2d 13 (1931); Jones v. Williams, 121 Tex. 94 , 45 S.W.2d 130 (1931). … Sullivan v. State, 564 S.W.2d 698 (Tex.Cr.App.1978) (State’s Motion for Rehearing); Cazares v. State, 488 S.W.2d 455 (Tex.Cr.App.1972); Campbell v. State, 492 S.W.2d 956 (Tex.Cr.App.1973); Gomez v.