Case law

Banda v. State

890 S.W.2d 42 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 14, 1994

Id.; Maixner v. State, 753 S.W.2d 151, 155 (Tex.Cr.App.1988); and, Johnson v. State, 871 S.W.2d 744, 751 (Tex.Cr.App.1994). In Brown v. … In Cook v.

Crecelius v. State

155 Tex. Crim. 30 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 7, 1950

At that time, Fred Prestage, an inspector for the liquor control board, who was later joined by Inspectors Tally and Matthews and two policemen of the city of Lubbock, knocked on the door of the house and, upon being admitted … Jenkins v. State, 116 Tex. Cr. R. 374 , 32 S. W. 2d 848 ; Ware v. State, 110 Tex. Cr. R. 90 , 7 S. W. 2d 551; Bird v. State, 110 Tex. Cr. R. 99 , 7 S. W. 2d 953 . The search warrant authorized the search.

Leahy v. State

111 Tex. Crim. 570 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 24, 1928

See also Brown v. State, 57 Tex. Crim. Rep. 576. Stovall v. State, 104 Tex. Crim. Rep. 217. … State v. Ganger, 73 Mont. 194 . The following language occurs in the case of Brown v. State, 3 Tex. Crim.

Goode v. State

57 Tex. Crim. 220 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 3, 1909

Bohannan v. State, 14 Texas Crim. App., 271; Harrison v. State, 3 Texas Crim. App., 558; Preston v. State, 4 Texas Crim. App., 186; Brown v. State, 6 Texas Crim. App., 286; Rothschild v. State, 7 Texas Crim. … See also Burrell v. State, 18 Texas, 713 ; Dixon v. State, 15 Texas Crim. App., 271; Coombes v. State, 17 Texas Crim. App., 258; Thomas v. State, 18 Texas Crim. App., 213; Johnson v. Brown, 51 Texas, 65 ; Phillips v.

Williams v. State

42 Tex. Crim. 368 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 19, 1900

Brown’s room in the Heizman dwelling, and which said room was commonly used for gaming. These allegations did not charge an offénse. … Miller v. State, supra; Burke v. State (Texas Crim. App.), 35 S. W. Rep., 659 ; White v. State, 39 Texas Crim. Rep., 269 , and Rail v. State (Texas Crim. App.), 50 S. W.

Cobb v. State

386 S.W.2d 811 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 13, 1965

The charge is substantially the same as that set forth in Cook v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 211 S.W.2d 224 , which has been cited with approval by this Court. … Vineyard v. State, 96 Tex.Cr.R. 401 , 257 S.W. 548 . Finding no reversible error, the judgment is affirmed.

Perkins, Mickey Ray

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Sep 7, 2022

In Old Chief v. … Cohn v. State, 849 S.W.2d 817, 820 (Tex. Crim.

Jones v. State

119 Tex. Crim. 525 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 14, 1931

Ross v. State, 60 Texas Crim. Rep., 547 , 132 S. W., 793 ; Lawson v. State, 17 Texas App., 302; Wood v. State, 80 Texas Crim. Rep., 398 , 189 S. W., 474 ; Jennings v. State, 80 Texas Crim. Rep., 450 , 190 S. W., 733 . … Anschicks v. State, 6 Texas App., 534; Favors v. State, 20 Texas App., 155; Fitzgerald v. State, 20 Texas App., 294; Jenkins v. State, 115 Texas Crim. Rep., 53 , 27 S. W. (2d) 164 ; Branch’s Penal Code, sec. 1780.

Webb v. State

160 Tex. Crim. 144 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 19, 1954

The appellant testified that when the deceased boarded the street car in Mexico he asked for a transfer, which was given him; that after arriving in El Paso the deceased demanded another transfer; that he told the deceased … In Farmer v. State, 158 Texas Cr.

Salinas, Orlando

464 S.W.3d 363 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jul 1, 2015

App. 1992); Briggs v. State, 789 S.W .2d 918, 923 (Tex. Crim. App. 1990); United States v. … Appellant’s reply briefs also cite a newspaper article, various state government websites, a report by the Legislative Budget Board, and a resolution by the Texas Judicial Council.

Hernandez v. State

726 S.W.2d 53 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Sep 17, 1986

See Brown v. State, 657 S.W.2d 797, 801 (Tex. Cr.App.1983) (Concurring Opinion). … Brown, supra, (Concurring opinion).

McCurley v. State

107 Tex. Crim. 425 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 1, 1927

Brown v. State, 26 Tex. Crim. App. 313; Jones v. State, 96 S. W. 930 ; Campbell v. State, 103 Tex. Crim. Rep. 488, 280 S. W. 1068 . For collation of authorities see Art. 727, note 12, Vernon’s C. C. … DeArman v. State, 80 Tex. Crim. Rep. 147, 189 S. W. 149 ; Lowe v. State, 226 S. W. 675 ; Guyon v. State, 89 Tex. Crim. Rep. 287, 230 S. W. 408 ; Weaver v. State, 291 S. W. 240 , on rehearing.

Denton, Ex Parte William Charles

399 S.W.3d 540 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 22, 2013

V. … Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161, 165 , 97 S.Ct. 2221 , 53 L.Ed.2d 187 (1977); Ex parte Amador, 326 S.W.3d 202, 205 (Tex.Crim.App.2010).

Wilkerson v. State

60 Tex. Crim. 388 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 19, 1910

It is conceded by counsel that under the authority of Lee v. State, 44 Texas Crim. … Morgan preferred a man with a family so that he would not have to board him, and that in this connection appellant told him that he had no family and would have to be boarded. He went to work at Mr.

Statman v. State

740 S.W.2d 464 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 18, 1987

In Morgan v. State, supra, this Court again reinterpreted the provisions of Art. 44.02, Y.A.C.C.P., and overruled Haney v. State, 588 S.W.2d 913 (Tex.Cr.App.1979), and Ferguson v. … Also see Johnson v. State, 722 S.W.2d 417 (Tex.Cr.App.1986). In Moraguez v.

Long v. State

59 Tex. Crim. 103 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 16, 1910

of trustees, and the board had refused to remove her as teacher. … Trotter v. State, 37 Texas Crim. Rep., 468 ; Adams v. State, 35 Texas Crim. Rep., 285 ; Suit v. State, 30 Texas Crim. App., 319; Morrison v. State, 51 S. W. Rep., 358 ; Vick v. State, 51 S. W. Rep., 1117 .

Collins v. State

52 Tex. Crim. 455 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 5, 1908

Taking the State’s case as strong as the record can make it, it is shown that the prosecutrix boarded a Pullman car on the Texas and Pacific Eailway at El Paso, en route to visit her family in Georgia. … Rep., 498 ; Steinke v. State, 33 Texas Crim. Rep., 65 ; Porter v. State, 33 Texas Crim. Rep., 385 ; Marshall v. State, 34 Texas Crim. Rep., 22 ; Matthews v. State, 34 Texas Crim. Rep., 479 ; and Ellenberg v.

Smith v. State

147 Tex. Crim. 342 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 31, 1944

In the case of Follis v. State, 101 S. … In the case of Conde v. State, 34 S.

Height v. State

68 Tex. Crim. 278 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 23, 1912

P., Art. 743 (723); Nelson v. State, 35 Texas Crim. Rep., 205 ; Holliday v. State, 35 Texas Crim. Rep., 133 ; Tracy v. State, 44 Texas, 9 ; Elizando v. State, 31 Texas Crim. Rep., 237 ; Pearce v. State, 35 Texas Crim. … Appellent claimed, however, in his testimony that one Clancey, who was his partner, and who boarded at his house during all the time that he had pos *281 session of this piano at the two places in Hereford and since then

Chappell v. State

850 S.W.2d 508 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 3, 1993

In Fontenot v. … Id. at 435 . 11 See also, Brown v. State, 828 S.W.2d 762, 764 (Tex.Cr.App.1991) (Viola *513 tions of Tex.Code Crim.Proc.Ann. art. 28.10 are not subject to Rule 81(b)(2) harm analysis).