Case law

Godwin v. State

38 Tex. Crim. 466 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 15, 1897

See Sparks v. Com., 89 Ky., 644 , 20 S. W. Rep., 167 ; State v. King (Mont.), 24 Pac. Rep., 265 . … In State v. Crabtree (Mo.

Morgan v. State

545 S.W.2d 811 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 19, 1977

OPINION BROWN, Commissioner. This is an appeal from a conviction for attempted voluntary manslaughter. … Livingston v. State, 542 S.W.2d 655 (Tex.Cr.App.1976); Rodriquez v. State, 530 S.W.2d 944 (Tex.Cr.App.1975).

Powdrill v. State

69 Tex. Crim. 340 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 19, 1912

He then went to where he was boarding and ón the same day told Mrs. … Slade v. State, 29 Texas App., 381, 16 S. W. Rep., 257 ; Jones v. State, 29 Texas Crim. App., 20; Trevenio v. State, 48 Texas Crim. Rep., 207 , 87 S. W. Rep., 1162 ; McKinney v. State, 49 Texas Crim. Rep., 591 , 88 S.

Ex Parte Brown

205 S.W.3d 538 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 1, 2006

Holmes v. … See Schlup v.

Mathis v. State

121 Tex. Crim. 131 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 20, 1932

In Cox v. State, 92 Texas Crim. Rep., 497 , 244 S. … We are aware of the holding in Lasister v.

Parker v. State

985 S.W.2d 460 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 10, 1999

Stanley v. State, 646 S.W.2d 447 (Tex.Cr. App.1983); Vestal v. State, 162 Tex.Crim. 223 , 283 S.W.2d 955 (1955). … Accord Brown v. State, 888 S.W.2d 216 (Tex.App. — Amarillo 1994, no pet.) (disapproving of the holding in Dukes , but deciding the case on other grounds); but see Watson v.

McTyre v. State

113 Tex. Crim. 31 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 25, 1929

See Wolf v. State, 9 S.W.2d 350 . In the mansion there was found a half-gallon jar containing a small quantity of whisky. … See Chapin v. State, 107 Tex. Crim. 477 . The search warrant commanded the officers to search the "private residence, outbuildings and premises occupied by the appellant."

Borjan v. State

787 S.W.2d 53 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 21, 1990

Stone v. State, supra; Carver v. State, 510 S.W.2d 349, 355-356 (Tex.Cr.App.1974); Anderson v. State, 486 S.W.2d 569, 572 (Tex.Cr.App.1972); Myers v. State, 468 S.W.2d 847, 848-849 (Tex.Cr.App.1971). … Brown v. State, 530 S.W.2d 118 (Tex.Cr.App.1975); Klueppel v. State, 505 S.W.2d 572 (Tex.Cr.App.1974).

Sanders v. State

402 S.W.2d 735 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 30, 1966

This Court held in Crutchfield v. … See also Landers v. State, 114 Tex.Cr.R. 352 , 25 S.W.2d 868 ; House v. State, 128 Tex.Cr.R. 404 , 81 S.W.2d 708 ; Taylor v. State, 133 Tex.Cr.R. 56 , 106 S.W.2d 681 ; and Sparacino v.

Ramirez, Elizabeth

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 23, 2016

In Ex parte Brown, this Court held that Brown had failed to satisfy the actual-innocence standard, in part, because the Brown complainant’s recantation testimony at the habeas hearing was “vague, uncertain, and nonspecific … See Brown, 205 S.W.3d at 547.

Rivera, Cassandra

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 23, 2016

In Ex parte Brown, this Court held that Brown had failed to satisfy the actual-innocence standard, in part, because the Brown complainant’s recantation testimony at the habeas hearing was “vague, uncertain, and nonspecific … See Brown, 205 S.W.3d at 547.

McClintock, Bradley Ray

541 S.W.3d 63 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 22, 2017

State v. Cuong Phu Le, 463 S.W.3d 872, 877 (Tex. Crim. App. 2015) (citing Brown v. State, 605 S.W.2d 572, 577 (Tex. Crim. App. 1980), overruled on other grounds by Hedicke v. State, 779 S.W.2d 837 (Tex. Crim. … They seem to have held that Leon’s good-faith exception should not apply at all to permit the admissibility of 8 Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590 (1975). 9 Segura v.

Lámar v. State

415 S.W.2d 926 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 17, 1967

The witness stated that both were visible through the open door as they lay on the floor board. Reliance by appellant upon the holding of this Court in Henson v. … Marsh and Martinez v.

Brooks v. State

107 Tex. Crim. 546 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 24, 1927

In Morrison v. State, 40 Tex. Crim. Rep. 490, we held it not error to illustrate to a juror the meaning of circumstantial evidence. Also in Brown v. State, 76 Tex. Crim. Rep. 316. … Furlow v. State, 41 Tex. Crim. Rep. 12; Murphy v. State, 57 S. W. 967 ; Ward v. State, 59 Tex. Crim. Rep. 62; McGaughey v. State, 74 Tex. Crim. Rep. 529.

Nowlin v. State

507 S.W.2d 534 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 3, 1974

Likewise, in Grimes v. … Board-man in my office, and the reason why The appellant complains that the argument is reversible error because it is outside the record and improper bolstering of the complaining witness.

Kennedy v. State

150 Tex. Crim. 215 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 29, 1947

See Hafley v. State, 88 Tex. Cr. R. 51, 224 , S. W. 1099; Reynolds v. State, 100 Tex. Cr. R. 508 , 271 S. W. 907 ; Cordill v. State, 83 Tex. Cr. R. 74 , 201 S. W. 181 . … See Hooper v. State, 100 Tex. Cr. R. 147 , 272 S. W. 493 ; Brown v. State, 90 Tex. Cr. R. 231 , 234 S. W. 390 ; Dugan v. State, 82 Tex. Cr. R. 422 , 199 S. W. 616 .

Rice v. State

605 S.W.2d 895 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jul 16, 1980

Brown v. State, 576 S.W.2d 36, 42 (Tex.Cr.App.1979). … Etheredge v. State, 542 S.W.2d 148 (Tex.Cr.App.1976).

Scott v. State

40 Tex. Crim. 105 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 21, 1898

See Daud v. State, 34 Texas Crim. Rep., 460 ; Cagle v. State, 39 Texas Crim. Rep., 109 . Appellant contends that a suit for room rent could not be maintained by Mrs. Clemens against J. H. … Hirshfield v. State, 11 Texas Crim. App., 207; Witherspoon v. State (Texas Crim. App.), 37 S. W. Rep., 433 .

Benton and Gipson v. State

108 Tex. Crim. 285 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 30, 1927

Rep. 140; Gaines v. State, 53 S. W. 623 ; Walker v. State, 94 Tex. Crim. Rep. 414, 251 S. W. 235 . … Brown v. State, 87 Tex. Crim. Rep. 261, 222 S. W. 252 ; Carpenter v. State, 98 Tex. Crim. Rep. 307, 265 S. W. 706 .

Polous v. State

117 Tex. Crim. 1 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 18, 1931

Appellant did not testify that Hixen paid her board, but a witness for appellant, without objection on the part of the State, testified that Hixen had told him that he paid appellant board. … Blackwell v. State, 29 Texas App., 194, 15 S. W., 597 ; Cook v. State, supra. It is further stated by Mr.