Case law

Duty v. State

114 Tex. Crim. 420 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 5, 1930

It was undisputed that prosecutrix, Mary Ellen Tompkins, and appellant had an act of sexual intercourse in a room in appellant’s boarding house. Prosecutrix was under fifteen and appellant was twenty-one years of age. … Lusty v. State, 261 S. W. 775 . There are recognized exceptions to this rule. In the case of Lusty v. State, supra, the injured party was under fifteen years of age.

Jaffrion v. State

501 S.W.2d 322 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 21, 1973

Brown v. State, 171 Tex.Cr.R. 167 , 346 S.W.2d 842 (1961). The second ground is overruled. … Smith v. State, 455 S.W.2d 748 (Tex.Cr.App.1970). Indeed, as noted in Handley v.

Diaz v. State

62 Tex. Crim. 317 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 10, 1911

In the case of Sansbury v. State, 4 Texas Crim. … Boyle v. The State, 37 Texas, 360 ; Martinez v. The State, 41 Texas, 164 ; Ridgeway v. The State, 41 Texas, 231 ; Lavarre v. The State, 1 Texas Ct. App., 685.”

Henderson v. State

420 S.W.2d 613 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 15, 1967

Aguilar v. State of Texas, 378 U.S. 108 , 84 S.Ct. 1509 , 12 L.Ed.2d 723 , is cited by appellant. … McClain v. State, 165 Tex.Cr.R. 545 , 309 S.W.2d 456 , cited by the state, supports our conclusion that probable cause was shown. The judgment is affirmed.

Ex Parte Taylor

522 S.W.2d 479 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 5, 1975

May v. State, 151 Tex.Cr.R. 534 , 209 S.W.2d 606 (1948); Alexander v. State, 163 Tex.Cr.R. 53 , 288 S.W.2d 779 (1956); Wilson v. … See Ex parte Austin, 410 S.W.2d 439 (Tex.Cr.App.1967); Ex parte Dowden, 408 S.W.2d 512 (Tex.Cr.App.1966); Ex parte Brown, 404 S.W.2d 590 (Tex.Cr. App.1966); Ex parte Cooper, 388 S.W.2d 939 (Tex.Cr.App.1965).

Kellum v. State

102 Tex. Crim. 537 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 18, 1925

He said: “I smelled it and it was whiskey. * * * Some of it was on the running board of the *540 car.” … Cathey v. State, 252 S. W. Rep. 534 ; Carson v. State, 69 Ala. 240 .

Mabou v. State

429 S.W.2d 891 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 29, 1968

Art. 38.24, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P.; Nations v. State, 91 Tex.Cr.R. 112 , 237 S.W. 570 ; Aughts v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 364 S.W.2d 689 . … In Stockton v.

Leal, Humberto Jr.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 27, 2011

See Medellin v. … See Medellin v.

Moore v. State

122 Tex. Crim. 257 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 26, 1932

Analogous cases are McPherson v. State, 119 Texas Crim. Rep., 293 , 43 S. W. (2d) 944 ; Read v. State, 116 Texas Crim. Rep., 240 , 34 S. W. (2d) 269 ; Taylor v. State, 105 Texas Crim. Rep., 465 , 288 S. W., 1080 . … Many cases may be cited, among them, Wilkerson v. State, 108 Texas Crim. Rep., 384 , 300 S. W., 942 ; Brown v. State, 121 Texas Crim. Rep., 528 , 51 S. W. (2d) 616 .

Wood v. State

632 S.W.2d 734 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 3, 1982

In appellant’s “Stipulation of Evidence,” we also find the following: I stipulate that the references to the “brown car” or “brown oldsmobile” are the same car owned by Vallie Haywood, and the references to “Tractor-trailor … See United States v. Williams, supra; United States v. Lowery, supra.

Davis v. State

101 Tex. Crim. 667 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 6, 1925

However, according to the testimony, he had previously pointed out another and different satchel, a brown one. … In support of this theory several cases are cited, among them being Largen v. State, Ex rel., Abney, 76 Tex. Rep. 328 ; American Cent. Ins. Co. v. Heath, 69 S.W. Rep., 235 ; also 57 Amer. St.

Ex Parte Devereaux

389 S.W.2d 672 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 24, 1965

In the light of the reasoning of the Supreme Court of this State in Schlichting v. … Texas State Board of Medical Examiners, 158 Tex. 279 , 310 S.W.2d 557 , of this Court in Ex parte Wilson, 374 S.W.2d 229 , and the San Antonio Court of Civil Appeals in Dickison v.

Musick v. State

106 Tex. Crim. 207 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 9, 1927

C., 1925, Vol. 2, p. 328, note 58; also Medford v. State, 86 Tex. Crim. Rep. 237; Joiner v. State, 89 Tex. Crim. Rep. 408; Ardry v. State, 90 Tex. Crim. Rep. 167; Howard v. State, 90 Tex. Crim. … Musick was his sister; that she had lived in Wichita Falls during the years 1922 and 1923; that he boarded with the family and had seen the appellant there during the spring of 1923 at his home where he and his wife lived

Onderdonck v. State

139 Tex. Crim. 296 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 3, 1940

In support of what we have said we refer to the case of Lewis v. State, 217 S. W., 695 . The case of Pleasant v. State, 128 S. W. (2d), 813 (814) is distinguishable. … See Schafer v. State, 40 S. W. (2d), 147 and authorities cited. See also Vaughn v. State, 102 Tex. Crim. Rep., 207, 277 S.

Sanchez v. State

120 S.W.3d 359 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 12, 2003

Marin v. … See Gonzalez v.

Jones v. State

164 Tex. Crim. 253 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 13, 1957

State’s Liquor Control Board Inspector W. E. … Williams v. State, 7 Texas App. 163.

Stanton v. State

743 S.W.2d 233 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 20, 1988

Stanton v. State, supra. … King v. State, 631 S.W.2d 486, 497 (Tex.Cr.App.1982), citing Honeycutt v. State, 499 S.W.2d 662 (Tex.Cr.App.1973), and Brown v. State, 481 S.W.2d 106 (Tex.Cr.App.1972). Compare, e.g., Tarpley v.

Mosquera, Airton

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 5, 2025

Under Strickland v. … Miller v. State, 548 S.W.3d 497, 499 (Tex. Crim.

Segundo v. State

270 S.W.3d 79 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 10, 2008

The language to which appellant refers is standard “boilerplate,” pre-printed language in a form entitled Board of Pardons and Paroles Proclamation of Revocation and Warrant of Arrest. … .”); Cook v.

Pruitt, Jr. v. State

114 Tex. Crim. 281 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 8, 1930

Rep. 585; Harris v. State, 62 Tex. Crim. Rep. 235; Williams v. State, 63 Tex. Crim. Rep. 507. … Brown v. State, 105 Tex. Crim. Rep. 605; McClure v. State, 100 Tex. Crim. Rep. 549; Redding v. State, 95 Tex. Crim. Rep. 644. Appellant testified for himself as a witness.