Case law

Ex Parte Vaccarezza

52 Tex. Crim. 105 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 10, 1907

We are also referred to Davis v. State, 2 Texas Crim. App., 431, and to State v. Drake, 86 Tex. 329 ; and Hirn v. State of Ohio, 1 Ohio St. 15 ; and Bush v. D.C., 1 Ct. App., D.C., 1. … On the same subject see Endlich on Interpretation of Statutes, secs. 198 to 200; Norris v. Crocker, 13 How., 429 ; Dowdell v. State, 58 Ind. 333 ; Johns v. State, 78 Ind. 332 ; Mitchell v. Brown, 1 E. E., 267.

Bell v. State

546 S.W.2d 614 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 16, 1977

*615 OPINION BROWN, Commissioner. This is an appeal from a conviction for rape under the provisions of the former Penal Code, Article 1183, Vernon’s Ann.P.C. … See Moore v. Commonwealth, 523 S.W.2d 635 (Ky.Ct.App.1975). The Phillips case and the subsequent cases of Esquivel v. State, 506 S.W.2d 613 (Tex.Cr.App.1974) and Banks v.

Sheldon v. State

510 S.W.2d 936 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 26, 1974

In Imhoff v. … App., 478 S.W.2d 83 ; Brown v. Beto, 468 F.2d 1284 (5th Cir. 1972). We need not consider appellant’s argument that such statement was the fruit of an unlawful search in view of our disposition of his first contention.

Collins v. State

88 Tex. Crim. 358 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 12, 1921

Thomson v. State, 49 Texas Crim. Rep., 384 ; Penton v. State, 53 Texas Crim. Rep., 323 . … Bethune v. State, 49 Texas Crim. Rep., 166 ; Bradley v. State, 60 Texas Crim. Rep., 402 ; Jennings v. State, 60 Texas Crim. *360 Rep., 424; McMillan v. State, 65 Texas Crim. Rep., 319 , 143 S. W. Rep., 1174 .

Ex Parte Baldree

810 S.W.2d 213 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 29, 1991

California v. Brown, 479 U.S. 538, 545 , 107 S.Ct. 837, 841 , 93 L.Ed.2d 934 (1987) (concurring opinion). … California v. Brown, supra, 479 U.S. at 545 , 107 S.Ct. at 841 (concurring opinion) (emphasis in original). Id., 492 U.S. at 319 , 109 S.Ct. at 2947 .

Anderson v. State

113 Tex. Crim. 450 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 30, 1929

Skinner v. State, 251 S. W. 810 ; Miller v. State, 294 S. W. 582 ; Tippett v. State, 39 S. W. 120 . … See Brown v. State, 254 S. W. 995 ; Bennett v. State, 81 S. W. 30 .

Fannin v. State

51 Tex. Crim. 41 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 20, 1907

See Smith v. State, 11 Texas Ct. Rep., 1023; Bollen v. State, 13 Texas Ct. Rep., 148, and Glenn v. State, 15 Texas Ct. Rep., 878. … Rep., 586 ; State v. Brown, 104 Mo., 365 , and State v. Carroll, 160 Mo., 368 . This last case appears to make it *44 robbery to take more than is justly due. In the Georgia ease Crawford was tried for murder.

Turner v. State

93 Tex. Crim. 104 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 13, 1922

Bateson v. State, 46 Texas Crim. Rep., 46 ; Coleman v. State, 49 Texas Crim. Rep., 357 ; Tardy v. State, 47 Texas Crim. Rep., 444 ; Best v. State, 61 Texas Crim. Rep., 554 ; Sanders v. State, 85 S. W. … Rep., 712 ; Brown v. State, 85 Texas Crim. Rep., 493 ; Dugan v. State, 86 Texas Crim. Rep., 130 ; Mickle v. State, 88 Texas Crim. Rep., 405 , 227 S. W. Rep., 491 .

Cox v. State

160 Tex. Crim. 162 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 24, 1954

Inspector Sparks of the Texas Liquor Control Board testified that on the day in question, in company with other officers and armed with a search wararnt, which he had lost prior to the trial, he arrived at appellant’s rural … Appellant relies upon Glenniwinkel v. State, 114 Texas Cr. Rep. 188 , 21 S.W. 2d 514 . In that case there was no evidence that the warrant had been dated or signed by the magistrate.

Peters v. State

142 Tex. Crim. 146 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 12, 1941

The evidence shows that under a search warrant an inspector of the Liquor Control Board, in company with the sheriff’s department, appeared at the appellant’s residence and exhibited their warrant, appellant not being present … In the case of Alexander v. State, 82 S.

Evans v. State

299 S.W.3d 138 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 16, 2009

We granted review solely to consider whether “the holdings of Cunningham v. State, 726 S.W.2d 151 (Tex.Crim.App.1987), and Ochoa v. … Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161, 165 , 97 S.Ct. 2221 , 53 L.Ed.2d 187 (1977). The present case involves multiple punishments resulting from a single prosecution.

Chavira v. State

167 Tex. Crim. 197 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 26, 1958

Williams v. State, 77 Texas Cr. Rep. 563 , 179 S.W. 710 , and Watts v. State, 151 Texas Cr. … Brown v. State, 41 Texas Cr. Rep. 232 , 53 S.W. 866 , and Hawkins v. State, 77 Texas Cr. Rep. 520 , 179 S.W. 448 .

McLemore v. State

53 Tex. Crim. 552 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 20, 1908

the following statement: That he had worked in clubrooms where intoxicating liquors were dealt in in Brownwood practically all the time during the past three years, during which time the local option law was in force in Brown … In the case of Harris v. State, 50 Texas Crim. Rep., 411 ; 98 S. W.

Pemberton v. State

55 Tex. Crim. 464 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 10, 1909

See Kunde v. State, 22 Texas Crim. App., 418. Bill No. 2 shows that the State proved by Dr. … Bill No. 4 shows that appellant offered to prove by the witness Ed Brown that he lived in the neighborhood and near appellant’s home; that one Charlie Comstock also lived near appellant’s home, where the shooting occurred

Reed v. State

744 S.W.2d 112 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 20, 1988

Washburn v. State, 318 S.W.2d 627, 634 (Tex.Cr.App.1958); Brown v. State, 561 S.W.2d 484 (Tex.Cr.App.1978). The corroborative evidence may be circumstantial or direct. 23 C.J.S., Crim. Law, § 812(3), p. 107; Brown v. … Duff-Smith v. State, 685 S.W.2d 26 (Tex.Cr.App.1985). In Brown v.

Ex Parte Cavazos

203 S.W.3d 333 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 4, 2006

V. … Ex parte Hawkins, 6 S.W.3d 554, 556 (Tex.Crim.App.1999)(citing Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161 , 97 S.Ct. 2221 , 53 L.Ed.2d 187 (1977)).

Stracener, Russell Lynn

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Aug 25, 2010

Applicant contends, inter alia , that he was denied due process when the Board of Pardons and Paroles advised him that his release on parole would be subject to sex offender conditions, although he was not convicted of a … Meza v. Livingston , 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 10321 , 50-51 (5th Cir. Tex. May 20, 2010). Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. In these circumstances, additional facts are needed.

Ex Parte Moussazadeh

361 S.W.3d 684 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 15, 2012

Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 56 , 106 S.Ct. 366 , 88 L.Ed.2d *689 203 (1985) (quoting McMann v. … See Mitschke v. State, 129 S.W.3d 130, 135 (Tex.Crim.App.2004). Parole attainment, on the other hand, is not governed by statute and is granted at the discretion of the parole board.

Hammond v. State

138 Tex. Crim. 546 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 13, 1940

See Waltrip v. State, 114 S. W. (2d), 555 , Art. 727a C. C. P.; Harbor v. State, 31 S. W. (2d), 650 . In the case of Morris v. State, 27 S. … The inspector of the Texas Liquor Control Board was permitted to testify that Mr.

Stamps, Jimmy

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 19, 2021

1 This Court has reviewed Applicant’s other claims and finds them to be without merit.  2 and Morrissey v. … The trial court shall order the Board of Pardons and Paroles' Office of the General Counsel to obtain a response from a person with knowledge of relevant facts.