Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterstexcrimapp

9,209 results

1.76s

  • Outlaw, Byron Orrick

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 29, 2020

    Outlaw v. State, No. 02-06-00447-CR (Tex. App. — Fort Worth, 2008) (not designated for publication). … Copies of this order shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles. Filed: January 29, 2020 Do not publish

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Simone v. State

    157 Tex. Crim. 393 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 2, 1952

    Crank, an agent of the Texas Liquor Control Board. The agents went to the club on three successive nights: June 11, 18, and 25, 1949. … W. 2d 902 ; King v. State, 141 Tex. Cr. R. 257 , 148 S. W. 2d 199 ; May v. State, 151 Tex. Cr. R. 534 , 209 S. W. 2d 606 ; Hall v. State, 155 Tex. Cr. R. 392 , 235 S. W. 2d 638 . As was pointed out in King v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Adams v. State

    385 S.W.2d 857 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 20, 1965

    Mitchell v. State, 87 Tex.Cr.R. 530 , 222 S.W. 983 . A motion for continuance failing to state-that it is a first application therefor is regarded as a subsequent motion. McNeil v. … Kincheloe v. State, 146 Tex.Cr. 414 , 175 S.W.2d 593 ; Duncan v. State, 170 Tex.Cr.R. 132 , 339 S.W.2d 220 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Garcia, Louie Roland

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 18, 2020

    See State v. Wilson, 324 S.W.3d 595, 598 (Tex. Crim. … of time must be requested by the trial court and obtained from this Court. 1 According to the record, a large bundle wrapped in tape containing 1,102 grams of methamphetamine was found behind a loose board

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Marshall v. State

    185 S.W.3d 899 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 15, 2006

    However, the names in the style of the cases included in the jury charge, “State of Oklahoma v. Marshall Michael Brown” and “State of Oklahoma v. Melvin B. … Relying on Welch v.

    Cited 40 timesPublished
  • Sagu v. State

    94 Tex. Crim. 14 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 20, 1922

    In said deposition appears the statement made by said consul that appellant stated to him that he could not understand why people looked at him insistently on board the trains with much curiosity. … Massey v. State, 1 Texas Crim. App., 570; Fury v. State, 8 Texas Crim. App., 472; Schultze v. State, 20 Texas Crim. App., 315; Johnson v. State, 23 Texas Crim. App., 163; Abram v. State, 36 Texas Crim. Rep., 44.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Searcy, Shwannia Rena

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Sep 11, 2019

    Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471 (1972); Ex parte Taylor, 957 S.W.2d 43 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle her to relief. … The trial court shall order the Texas Department of Criminal Justice’s Office of the General Counsel to file an affidavit addressing the issue of whether the Parole Board is timely providing Applicant with a final parole

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Clements v. State

    145 Tex. Crim. 428 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 3, 1943

    In point by analogy only we find the case of Brown v. State, 105 Tex. Cr. R. 586 , 289 S. W. 682 ; Edwards v. State, 134 Tex. Cr. R. 512 , 116 S. W. (2d) 711 . … I am in accord with Harris v. State, 99 Tex. Cr. R. 60 , 268 S. W. 160 , as well as Mobley v. State, 89 Tex. Cr. R. 646 , 232 S.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Young v. State

    82 Tex. Crim. 257 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 14, 1917

    Black v. State, 1 Texas Crim. App., 381; Ray v. State, 4 Texas Crim. App., 455; Dunlap v. State, 9 Texas Crim. App., 188; Simms v. State, 10 Texas Crim. App., 166; Potts v. State, 26 Texas Crim. App., 665; McGee v. … Thompson v. State, 19 Texas Crim. App., 616; Brown v. State, 45 Texas Crim. Rep., 139 ; Branch’s Ann. P.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Bailey v. State

    365 S.W.2d 170 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 27, 1963

    Green v. State, 53 Tex.Cr.R. 490 , 110 S.W. 920 , 22 L.R.A., N.S., 706; Kirkland v. State, 86 Tex.Cr.R. 595 , 218 S.W. 367 ; Board v. State, 122 Tex.Cr.R. 487 , 56 S.W.2d 464 ; Jackson v. … In Powdrill v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Carter v. State

    283 S.W. 174 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 3, 1926

    See Cheatham v. State, 57 Tex. Cr. R. 442 , 125 S. W. 565 ; Branch’s Ann. Tex. P. C. p. 1099; Rasberry v. State, 84 Tex. Cr. R. 393 , 208 S. W. 168 . … The application of the principles will be found in cases listed in Noble v. State, 100 Tex. Cr. R. 404 , 273 S. W. 251 , to which we refer.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown, Ex Parte Curtis Eugene

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 1, 2006

    See Schlup v. … See Herrera v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Slaughter v. State

    151 Tex. Crim. 156 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 18, 1947

    In the Derden opinion reliance is had upon language found in Mapes v. State, 13 Tex. App. 85, which is quoted. We call attention to Cartwright v. State, 97 Tex. Cr. R. 230 , 259 S. … W. (2d) 869 , and Streich v. State, 78 Tex. Cr. R. 155 , 180 S. W. 266 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Washington v. State

    296 S.W. 512 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 13, 1927

    He held the steering wheel with his left hand and was standing on the running board, and he had the turtle back up and would reach in there and get them and throw them out. He threw out ten containers. … Odenthal v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 290 S. W. 743 ; Battle v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 290 S. W. 762 . The judgment must be affirmed, and it is so ordered.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sampson v. State

    45 Tex. Crim. 556 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 20, 1904

    the judge presiding at the trial of this case, showing the following facts in reference to said order: That on the 31st day of October, 1903, motion for new trial was duly presented in the case of the State of *557 Texas v. … Smith v. State, 53 S. W. Rep., 632 ; Brown v. State, 44 S. W. Rep., 172 ; Denton v. State, 42 Texas Crim. Rep., 428 . And where there was a failure to so enter said order we would not consider the statement of facts.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hoots v. State

    501 S.W.2d 134 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 31, 1973

    The State relies solely on Fisher v. State, 160 Tex.Cr.R. 634 , 274 S.W.2d 397 , to show that the evidence is sufficient to sustain the conviction. In Fisher v. … In O’Neal v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Miller v. State

    736 S.W.2d 639 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 27, 1987

    Meeks v. State, 692 S.W.2d 504, 510 (Tex.Cr.App.1985). In Brown v. … Or, in other words, were there intervening events that “attenuate[d] the taint,” Brown v. Illinois, supra, 95 S.Ct. at 2261 , of the illegal arrest.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Reinhardt v. State

    60 Tex. Crim. 662 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 30, 1910

    See McHenry v. State, 54 Texas Crim. Rep., 477 ; Swain v. State, 48 Texas Crim. Rep., 98 ; Neyland v. State, 13 Texas Crim. App., 33; Howard v. State, 23 Texas Crim. App., 265; Orman v. State, 24 Texas Crim. … App., 494; Cochran v. State, 28 Texas Crim. App., 422; Baltrip v. State, 30 Texas Crim. Rep., 545 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Ex Parte Spann

    122 Tex. Crim. 314 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 22, 1932

    The Supreme Court of this state, in the case of American Indemnity Company v. … Co. v. Collins (Texas Civ. App.), 148 S.W. 554 , 556; State v. Towery, 143 Ala. 48 , 39 So. 309 ; Jeffries v. Board of Trustees, 135 Ky. 488 , 122 S.W. 813 , 816; Falconer v. Robinson, 46 Ala. 340 , 348; Cortesy v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Sims v. State

    247 S.W.2d 1022 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 16, 1952

    The state introduced evidence showing the purchase, by Liquor Control Board investigators, of whisky. The appellant offered no defense and introduced no evidence. … See Lerma v. State, 81 Tex.Cr.R. 109 , 194 S.W. 167 ; Cook v. State, 96 Tex. Cr.R. 586, 258 S.W. 1058 .'" We find no reversible error and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. On Motion for Rehearing.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.