Case law

Garner v. State

100 Tex. Crim. 626 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 4, 1925

Nelley v. State, 93 Texas Crim. Rep. 522 , 248 S. W. Rep. 367 ; Kocich v. State,, - Texas Crim. Rep. -, 249 S. W. Rep. 494 ; Lumus v. State, - Texas Crim. Rep. -, 250 S. W. Rep. 425 ; Brown v. State, - Texas Crim.

Legois v. State

80 Tex. Crim. 356 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 15, 1916

In Cohen v. Rice, 101 S.W. … See also Garonzik v. State, 50 Tex.Crim. Rep.; Ex parte King, 52 Tex.Crim. Rep.; Ex parte Levine, 46 Tex. Crim. 364 ; Williams v. State, 52 Tex.Crim. Rep..

Navarijo, Frank

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 18, 2014

I do not think this Court is bound by the convicting court’s determination that the complaining witness’s recantation is more credible than her trial testimony, even if it is 2 Ex parte Brown, 205 S.W.3d … strongly tending to corroborate that an assault took place, the complaining witness’s acknowledgment at the writ hearing that nobody else sexually assaulted her,11 and the detailed nature of the 9 State v.

Zucarro v. State

82 Tex. Crim. 1 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 28, 1917

This was held by the Court of Civil Appeals at Austin in an opinion by Judge Key in the case of Burton v. Dupree, 46 S.W. Rep., 272 , and by the Supreme Court in an opinion by Chief Justice Brown in Brown Cracked Co. v. … In Davis v.

Ivey, Mark

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 11, 2009

PD-0552-08 MARK WILLIAM IVEY, Appellant v. … Neither Whitehead , nor the case upon which it relied, Brown v. State , (31) purported to construe a predecessor to Article 42.12.

Navarijo, Frank

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 18, 2014

Ex parte Brown , 205 S.W.3d 538, 545 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). 3. Spencer , 337 S.W.3d at 881 (Price, J., concurring) (quoting Elizondo , 947 S.W.2d at 209). 4. Majority Opinion at 10-11. 5. Tex. Code Crim. … State v. Addington , 588 S.W.2d 569, 570 (Tex. 1979). 10. The case for actual innocence here is certainly more compelling, for example, than it was in Ex parte Harleston , ___ S.W.3d ___, No.

Bailey v. State

365 S.W.2d 170 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 27, 1963

Green v. State, 53 Tex.Cr.R. 490 , 110 S.W. 920 , 22 L.R.A., N.S., 706; Kirkland v. State, 86 Tex.Cr.R. 595 , 218 S.W. 367 ; Board v. State, 122 Tex.Cr.R. 487 , 56 S.W.2d 464 ; Jackson v. … In Powdrill v.

Rodney Boyett v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Sep 8, 2015

Mississippi, 297 U.S. 278 (1936) .............................................................47 Brown v. State, 605 S.W.2d 572 (Tex. Crim. App. 1980) .......................................44 Brown v. … Miller v. Fenton, 474 U.S. 104, 109 (1985), citing Brown v. Mississippi, 297 U.S. 278 (1936).

Hickman v. State

64 Tex. Crim. 161 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 13, 1911

(Randle v. The State, 41 Texas, 292 .)” See also Phillips v. The State, 29 Texas, 236 ; Berliner v. State, 6 Texas Crim. App., 181; Waddell v. The State, 1 Texas Crim. App., 720; Day v. State, 14 Texas Crim. App., 26. … The names of the purchasers were placed on a circular board, whirled and shot at; the person’s number to which a shot came nearest, won the gun. This court held this constituted a raffle in the case off Risien v.

Garcia, Louie Roland

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 18, 2020

See State v. Wilson, 324 S.W.3d 595, 598 (Tex. Crim. … of time must be requested by the trial court and obtained from this Court. 1 According to the record, a large bundle wrapped in tape containing 1,102 grams of methamphetamine was found behind a loose board

Hardy v. State

171 Tex. Crim. 18 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 22, 1961

This is a companion case to Cause No. 33,135, styled Elmer Hardy, Appellant, v. … The State of Texas, Appellee, this day decided, (page 17, this volume), in which the conviction of appellant for unlawfully selling whisky to Texas Liquor Control Board Inspector Ralph C.

Ex Parte Zapata

235 S.W.3d 794 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 10, 2007

Zapata v. State, 121 S.W.3d 66 (Tex.App.-San Antonio, 2003, pet. ref'd). … See generally Gardner v. State, 164 S.W.3d 393 (Tex.Cr.App.2005).

Dixon v. State

397 S.W.2d 454 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 5, 1966

He proceeded to take from under the cushion a .25 automatic Browning pistol which the proof showed was a pistol that belonged to the deceased. … .; Edmond v. State, supra; Bingham v. State, 163 Tex.Cr.R. 352 , 290 S.W.2d 915 .

Hunt v. State

160 Tex. Crim. 358 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 2, 1954

The case of Hoxsey v. State, 143 Texas Cr. R. 508, 159 S.W. 2d 886 , was one of like import to the present. … Under the testimony herein presented by the state, the appellant was a practitioner of electrical therapeutics as set forth in Larson v. State, 106 Texas Cr. R. 261, 285 S.W. 317 .

Baimonte v. State

101 Tex. Crim. 622 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 28, 1925

Pinckord v. State, 13 Tex. App. 468; Lawson v. State, 13 Tex. App. 264; Tyler v. State, 13 Tex. App. 205. This case comes squarely under the case of Smythe v. State, 17 Tex. App. 253. … Wooldridge v. State, 13 Tex. App. 443 [ 44 Am. Rep. 708 ]; St. Clair v. State, 11 Tex. App. 297.

Searcy, Shwannia Rena

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Sep 11, 2019

Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471 (1972); Ex parte Taylor, 957 S.W.2d 43 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle her to relief. … The trial court shall order the Texas Department of Criminal Justice’s Office of the General Counsel to file an affidavit addressing the issue of whether the Parole Board is timely providing Applicant with a final parole

Moncrief v. State

707 S.W.2d 630 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 16, 1986

Also see Michelson v. United States, 335 U.S. 469 , 69 S.Ct. 213 , 93 L.Ed. 168 (1948); Johnson v. State, 633 S.W.2d 888, 891-92 (Tex.Cr.App.1982); Ward v. State, supra; Brown v. … Ward v. State, supra, at page 818. Also see Brown v. State, 605 S.W.2d 572, 574 (Tex.Cr.App.1980); Wrenn v. State, 597 S.W.2d 369, 372, fn. 1 (Tex.Cr.App.1980); White v. State, 590 S.W.2d 936, 937 (Tex.Cr.App.1979). .

Carroll v. State

168 Tex. Crim. 41 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 25, 1959

Appellant’s contention appears to be supported by the cases of: Leinart v. State, 159 Texas Cr. Rep. 220 S.W. 2d 504, Perry v. State, 141 Texas Cr. Rep. 291 , 148 S.W. 2d 412 , Burns v. State, 112 Texas Cr. … S.; Brown v. State, 157 Texas Cr. Rep. 30 , 246 S.W. 2d 197 .

Jackson v. State

536 S.W.2d 371 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 28, 1976

Brown v. State, 523 S.W.2d 238 (Tex. *374 Cr.App.1975). The instruction to disregard the testimony concerning the threatened attachment was sufficient to remove any error. … In Britt v.

Ex Parte Davis

866 S.W.2d 234 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 1, 1993

Parks, 494 U.S. 484 , 110 S.Ct. 1257 , 108 L.Ed.2d 415 (1990); California v. Brown, 479 U.S. 538 , 107 S.Ct. 837 , 93 L.Ed.2d 934 (1987). … See Johnson v. State, 853 S.W.2d 527, at 533 (Tex.Cr.App.1992). 4 . The holding that "deliberate" and "intentional" do not mean the same thing may have been "implicit" in our caselaw as early as 1977, in Brown v.