Case law

Porter v. State

86 Tex. Crim. 23 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 26, 1918

In Brown v. State, 54 Tex.Crim. Rep., 112 S.W. … Mason v. State, 7 Texas Crim. App., 623; Sager v. State, 11 Texas Crim. App., 110; Bonnard v. State, 25 Ter. Crim. App., 173; Green v. State, 54 Tex.Crim. Rep.; Geller v. State, 56 Tex.Crim. Rep.; Reddick v.

Mata, Alejandro Rodriguez

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 6, 2007

Rylander v. State , 101 S.W.3d 107, 110 (Tex. Cr. App. 2003) (quoting Mitchell v. State , 68 S.W.3d 640, 642 (Tex. Cr. App. 2002)). 16. Bone v. State , 77 S.W.3d 828, 835 (Tex. Cr. App. 2002). 17. … Erazo v. State , 144 S.W.3d 487, 491 (Tex. Cr. App. 2004); Mendiola v. State , 21 S.W. 3d 282, 285 (Tex. Cr. App. 2000). 31. Rogers v. State , 991 S.W.2d 263, 265 (Tex. Cr. App. 1999). 32. Id .; Beck v.

Brinkley v. State

167 Tex. Crim. 472 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 4, 1959

Schlemmer v. Board of Trustees of Limestone County, Tex.Civ.App., 59 S.W.2d 264, 265 . “Must”, and “shall” are synonymous and are usually mandatory when used in statutes. … Highland Farms Corp. v.

Ex Parte Guzmon

730 S.W.2d 724 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 8, 1987

Brown replied, “Possibly so. Frankly, yes.” He went on to explain: *727 A. Okay. … Hammett v. State, 713 S.W.2d 102 -106 (Tex.Cr.App.1986).)

Adley v. State

718 S.W.2d 682 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 6, 1985

Jeffers v. State, 646 S.W.2d 185 (Tex.Cr.App.1981). Furthermore, in Smith v. … Connally v. General Const. Co., 269 U.S. 385 , 46 S.Ct. 126 , 70 L.Ed. 322 (1926); Passmore v. State, 544 S.W.2d 399 (Tex.Cr.App.1976); Baker v.

State Ex Rel. Wilson v. Briggs

171 Tex. Crim. 479 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 29, 1961

Rogers v. Richmond, 357 U.S. 220 , 78 S. Ct. 1365 , 2 L. Ed. 2d 1361 . … The following quotation from Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443 , 97 L. Ed. 469 , 73 S. Ct. 397 , relating to the authority of Federal District Courts under the cited statutes is deemed appropriate.

Rodney Boyett v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Sep 8, 2015

Mississippi, 297 U.S. 278 (1936) .............................................................47 Brown v. State, 605 S.W.2d 572 (Tex. Crim. App. 1980) .......................................44 Brown v. … Miller v. Fenton, 474 U.S. 104, 109 (1985), citing Brown v. Mississippi, 297 U.S. 278 (1936).

Lewallen v. State

166 Tex. Crim. 287 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 19, 1958

Pineda v. State, 157 Texas Cr. Rep. 609 , 252 S.W. 2d 177 , and Manning v. State, 162 Texas Cr. Rep. 329 , 284 S.W. 2d 903 . We overrule appellant’s contention that the evidence does not show lack of consent. … We also overrule his contention that the Board of Directors of the corporation ratified his act by acquiescence. We are aware of no rule of law which would authorize them to ratify a crime.

Ex Parte March

423 S.W.2d 916 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 14, 1968

Brown, has made the writ returnable to this Court. … Anderson v. State, supra.

Navarijo, Frank

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 18, 2014

I do not think this Court is bound by the convicting court’s determination that the complaining witness’s recantation is more credible than her trial testimony, even if it is 2 Ex parte Brown, 205 S.W.3d … strongly tending to corroborate that an assault took place, the complaining witness’s acknowledgment at the writ hearing that nobody else sexually assaulted her,11 and the detailed nature of the 9 State v.

Martinez, John David

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 29, 2011

tell from the video the make of those trucks, or whether the dark color of those trucks could have been perceived as blue, or instead, whether they could have been a different color not easily confused with blue, such as brown … .); State v. Prendergast, 103 Haw. 451, 458-61, 83 P.3d 714, 721-24 (2004); State v.

Hickman v. State

64 Tex. Crim. 161 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 13, 1911

(Randle v. The State, 41 Texas, 292 .)” See also Phillips v. The State, 29 Texas, 236 ; Berliner v. State, 6 Texas Crim. App., 181; Waddell v. The State, 1 Texas Crim. App., 720; Day v. State, 14 Texas Crim. App., 26. … The names of the purchasers were placed on a circular board, whirled and shot at; the person’s number to which a shot came nearest, won the gun. This court held this constituted a raffle in the case off Risien v.

Ivey, Mark

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 11, 2009

PD-0552-08 MARK WILLIAM IVEY, Appellant v. … Neither Whitehead , nor the case upon which it relied, Brown v. State , (31) purported to construe a predecessor to Article 42.12.

Navarijo, Frank

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 18, 2014

Ex parte Brown , 205 S.W.3d 538, 545 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). 3. Spencer , 337 S.W.3d at 881 (Price, J., concurring) (quoting Elizondo , 947 S.W.2d at 209). 4. Majority Opinion at 10-11. 5. Tex. Code Crim. … State v. Addington , 588 S.W.2d 569, 570 (Tex. 1979). 10. The case for actual innocence here is certainly more compelling, for example, than it was in Ex parte Harleston , ___ S.W.3d ___, No.

Powell v. State

100 Tex. Crim. 541 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 8, 1925

McCormick v. State, 52 Texas Crim. Rep. 495 ; Zunago v. State, 63 Texas Crim. Rep. 64 ; Brown v. State, 176 S. W. Rep. 51 . We regret that we cannot agree with appellant in this contention.

Bailey v. State

365 S.W.2d 170 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 27, 1963

Green v. State, 53 Tex.Cr.R. 490 , 110 S.W. 920 , 22 L.R.A., N.S., 706; Kirkland v. State, 86 Tex.Cr.R. 595 , 218 S.W. 367 ; Board v. State, 122 Tex.Cr.R. 487 , 56 S.W.2d 464 ; Jackson v. … In Powdrill v.

Ex Parte Davis

866 S.W.2d 234 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 1, 1993

Parks, 494 U.S. 484 , 110 S.Ct. 1257 , 108 L.Ed.2d 415 (1990); California v. Brown, 479 U.S. 538 , 107 S.Ct. 837 , 93 L.Ed.2d 934 (1987). … See Johnson v. State, 853 S.W.2d 527, at 533 (Tex.Cr.App.1992). 4 . The holding that "deliberate" and "intentional" do not mean the same thing may have been "implicit" in our caselaw as early as 1977, in Brown v.

Baimonte v. State

101 Tex. Crim. 622 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 28, 1925

Pinckord v. State, 13 Tex. App. 468; Lawson v. State, 13 Tex. App. 264; Tyler v. State, 13 Tex. App. 205. This case comes squarely under the case of Smythe v. State, 17 Tex. App. 253. … Wooldridge v. State, 13 Tex. App. 443 [ 44 Am. Rep. 708 ]; St. Clair v. State, 11 Tex. App. 297.

Garner v. State

100 Tex. Crim. 626 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 4, 1925

Nelley v. State, 93 Texas Crim. Rep. 522 , 248 S. W. Rep. 367 ; Kocich v. State,, - Texas Crim. Rep. -, 249 S. W. Rep. 494 ; Lumus v. State, - Texas Crim. Rep. -, 250 S. W. Rep. 425 ; Brown v. State, - Texas Crim.

Legois v. State

80 Tex. Crim. 356 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 15, 1916

In Cohen v. Rice, 101 S.W. … See also Garonzik v. State, 50 Tex.Crim. Rep.; Ex parte King, 52 Tex.Crim. Rep.; Ex parte Levine, 46 Tex. Crim. 364 ; Williams v. State, 52 Tex.Crim. Rep..