Case law

Walton, Sharon Nicole

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Sep 16, 2020

Walton v. State, No. 12-20-00010-CR (Tex. App. — Tyler January 31, 2020) (not designated for publication). … Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles. Delivered: September 16, 2020 Do not publish

Weil v. State

48 Tex. Crim. 603 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 15, 1905

See Lucas v. State, 39 Texas Crim. Rep., 48 ; 44 S. W. Rep., 825 ; Brown v. State, 43 S. W. Rep., 986 .

Bickerstaff v. State

139 Tex. Crim. 69 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 6, 1940

In Simmons v. State, 7 S. … See, also, Villareal v. State, (Tex. Cr. App.) 21 S. W. (2d) 739 ; Harris v. State, 112 Tex. Cr. R. 219 , 15 S. W. (2d) 1048 .

Sandoval v. State

106 Tex. Crim. 468 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 17, 1926

They observed the appellant and the Mexicans around the automobile and also going back and forth to the boarding cars, making a good many trips. … See Agnello v. U.S., 269 U.S. 20 , 70 Law Ed. 145; Samino v. State, 83 Tex.Crim. Rep.; Harper v. State, 84 Tex.Crim. Rep.; Jones v. State, 85 Tex. Crim. 538 .

Denison v. State

651 S.W.2d 754 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 4, 1983

See Roberts v. State, 136 Tex.Cr.R. 138 , 124 S.W.2d 128 (Tex.Cr.App.1939); Walls v. State, 164 Tex.Cr.R. 470 , 299 S.W.2d 953 (Tex.Cr.App.1957); Conrad v. … State, 134 Tex.Cr.R. 611 , 117 S.W.2d 62 (Tex.Cr.App.1938); Brown v. State, 94 Tex.Cr.R. 140 , 250 S.W. 170 (Tex.Cr.App.1923); Hays v. State, 86 Tex.Cr.R. 469 , 217 S.W. 938 (Tex.Cr.App.1920); Sedgwick v.

McGowan v. State

664 S.W.2d 355 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 22, 1984

Church v. State, 552 S.W.2d 138 (Tex.Cr.App.1977); Horn v. State, 647 S.W.2d 283 (Tex.Cr.App.1983). A threat may be communicated by action or conduct as well as words. Horn v. State, supra; Berry v. … Nacol v. State, 590 S.W.2d 481, 486 (Tex.Cr.App.1979); Brown v. State, 505 S.W.2d 850, 857 (Tex.Cr.App.1974); Arrevalo v. State, 489 S.W.2d 569, 572 (Tex.Cr.App.1973); Allaben v.

Parks v. State

437 S.W.2d 554 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 19, 1969

Campbell v. State, 163 Tex.Cr.R. 545 , 294 S.W. 2d 125 ; Olivio v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 422 S.W.2d 182 ; Genzel v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 415 S.W.2d 919 ; Ferrell v. … We observe that the instruction on accomplice testimony is in the language approved in Brown v.

Barnes v. State

520 S.W.2d 401 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 12, 1975

In Harkey v. … Brown v. State, 437 S.W.2d 828 (Tex.Cr.App.1968).’ The rule in Wetherby has long been followed by this court.” Citing authorities. We hold that for the reasons stated above there is no merit in appellant’s contention.

Collins v. State

77 Tex. Crim. 156 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 2, 1915

McLean, Jr., Brown Harwood and John Connelly, and witness Willie Kidwell at the Tarrant County jail and between John Connelly and Brown Harwood at other places. … Com. v. Williams, 105 Mass., 62 ; Brown v. State, 76 Pa., 319 ; State v. Howard, 92 N. C., 772 ; Deal v. State, 140 Ind., 354 ; State v. Hopkirk, 84 Mo., 278 ; State v. Shinbom, 46 N. H., 497; Patten v.

Rutledge v. State

749 S.W.2d 50 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 17, 1988

The rationale for this rule is discussed in Brown v. State, 477 S.W.2d 617, 619-620 (Tex.Cr.App.1972), which states, The rationale behind this rule is that reputation is an opinion based on hearsay. … Nixon v. State, 653 S.W.2d 443 (Tex.Cr.App.1983); Johnson v. State, 633 S.W.2d 888 (Tex.Cr.App.1982) (and cases cited therein); Long v. State, 631 S.W.2d 157 (Tex.Cr.App.1982); Penagraph v.

Feige v. State

49 Tex. Crim. 513 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 21, 1906

The business of this corporation shall be conducted by a board of directors, to be elected annually by the members of said association, and those-appointed for the first year as directors, shall be composed of the following … In Krnavek v. State, 38 Texas Crim. Rep., 44 , the articles of incorporation were nearly similar to those here introduced in evidence. There the initiation fee was a dollar. For a while the monthly dues were 25 cents.

Hannon v. State

96 Tex. Crim. 660 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 19, 1923

On the arrival of the train, the appellant seized the suit case and went on board. … Cathey v. State, 94 Texas Crim. Rep., 599 , 252 S. W. Rep., 534 ; Carson v. State, 69 Ala., 240 ; Carson v.

McVicker v. State

137 Tex. Crim. 376 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 24, 1939

Herbert v. State, 134 Tex. Cr. R. 112 , 114 S. W. 549 , and cases therein cited. R. I. Deckert and E. J. Chatham were working as Inspectors of the Liquor Control Board.

Hollis v. State

144 Tex. Crim. 165 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 6, 1942

Many cases are cited in support of this section, some of the later ones being Johnson v. State, 140 S. W. 337 ; Brewster v. State, 145 S. W. 339 ; Jones v. State, 147 S. W. 251 ; Scott v. State, 153 S. … Strickland v. State, 47 S. W. 721 .

Mutscher v. State

514 S.W.2d 905 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Sep 24, 1974

Sharp — Chairman of the Board of Sharpstown Realty Company; Chairman of the Board of Sharpstown State Bank; Chairman of the Board of National Bankers Life Insurance Company *910 Father Francis Kennelly — Jesuit priest and … S. v.

Clary v. State

491 S.W.2d 900 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 28, 1973

v. … State, Tex.Cr.App., 451 S.W.2d 234 ; Perkins v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 450 S.W.2d 855 ; Rogers v. *903 State, Tex.Cr.App., 461 S.W.2d 399 ; Cherb v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 472 S.W.2d 273 ; Colunga v.

Lyons v. State

169 Tex. Crim. 39 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 3, 1960

It is appellant’s contention that the evidence is insufficient to support the conviction, and she relies upon several recent cases, among them being Maddox v. State 156 Tex. Cr. Rep. 151, 240 S. W. 2d 319 ; Crain v. … W. 2d 553 ; Boyte v. State 160 Tex. Cr. Rep. 42, 272 S. W. 2d 100 ; Harris v. State, 163 Tex. Cr. Rep. 519, 294 S. W. 2d 123 ; and Corrisco v. State, 164 Tex. Cr. Rep. 515, 301 S. W. 2d 144 .

Martinez, Charles Eugene

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 2, 2005

See Brown v. State , 649 S.W.2d 160, 162 (Tex. App. B Austin 1983, no pet.). [11] Because of the confusion concerning the appropriate scope and application of Articles 38.072 and 38.07, we granted review. II. … See Brown v. State , 649 S.W.2d 160, 162 (Tex. App. B Austin 1983, no pet.) ( A The witness = testimony is admissible to show that the complaint was made and the basic nature of the complaint.

James v. State

74 Tex. Crim. 139 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 29, 1914

Grissom v. State, 8 Texas Crim. App., 386; Wilson v. State, 33 Texas Crim. Rep., 22 ; Kramer v. State, 34 Texas Crim. Rep., 84 ; Burrell v. State, 18 Texas, 713 . … King v. State, 57 Texas Crim. Rep,, 363; Brown v. State, 57 Texas Crim. Rep., 570 ; Hinson v. State, 53 Texas Crim. Rep., 143 ; Mizell v. State, 59 Texas Crim. Rep., 226 , 128 S. W. Rep., 125 .

Ex Parte Ernest

138 Tex. Crim. 441 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 20, 1939

In the case of the City of Rockford v. Hey, 9 N. … See also Root v.