Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterstexcrimapp

9,209 results

5.30s

  • James Friend v. State

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 2, 2015

    James Friend v. … James Friend v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Steele v. State

    147 Tex. Crim. 481 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 21, 1944

    He went to *484 a certain barber shop and there a negro not known to Pleasant— so he claimed — handed him a brown paper bag which contained many envelopes and into which Pleasant put his envelope. … This same contention was made in Schwarz, v. State, 136 Tex. Cr. R. 260 , 124 S. W. (2d) 392 ; Canizares v. State, 143 Tex. Cr. R. 76 , 157 S. W. (2d) 385 ; Hill v. State, 143 Tex. Cr. R. 412 , 158 S.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Jones v. State

    462 S.W.2d 578 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 31, 1970

    First, it would appear that Hart v. … Johnson v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 418 S.W.2d 834 ; De La Rosa v. State, 167 Tex.Cr.R. 28 , 317 S.W.2d 544 . See also Edwards v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 427 S.W.2d 629 .

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Welch v. State

    107 Tex. Crim. 101 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 24, 1926

    They separated as they approached the car, and the appellant was standing by the car near the door with his foot on the running-board and talking to one of the men who was drilling a well. … See Jacobs v. State, 28 Tex. Crim. App. 79, and cases collated in Vernon’s Tex. Crim. Stat., 1925, Vol. 1, p. 283.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Gauldin v. State

    683 S.W.2d 411 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Sep 26, 1984

    When asked what vehicle he had driven to the club, appellant responded that he had arrived in a brown Ford LTD. The officers requested that appellant come outside so they could talk to him. … In Belton v.

    Overruled on other grounds by State v. Guzman, 1998 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 12 (1998)Cited 121 timesPublished
  • Harris v. State

    163 Tex. Crim. 519 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 17, 1956

    Under and by authority of a search warrant, agents of the Texas Liquor Control Board, together with the sheriff, searched the private residence of appellant for intoxicating liquor. … Ennox v. State, 130 Tex. Cr. R. 328 , 94 S.W. 2d 473 ; Powell v. State, 100 Tex. Cr. R. 43 , 271 S.W. 913 ; Gilbreath v. State, 158 Tex. Cr. R. 616 , 259 S.W. 2d 223 . The facts in the case of Dodd v. State, 149 Tex.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Jones v. State

    795 S.W.2d 199 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 20, 1990

    See Savant v. State, 535 S.W.2d 190, 192 (Tex.Crim.App.1976); Richie v. … Shaw v. State, 539 S.W.2d 887, 890 (Tex.Crim.App. 1976); Ex parte Brown, 477 S.W.2d 552, 554 (Tex.Crim. App.1972). See also Hurley v. State, 606 S.W.2d 887 , 888 n. 1 (Tex.Crim.App.1980). Cf. Homan v.

    Cited 125 timesPublished
  • Jones v. State

    115 Tex. Crim. 418 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 15, 1930

    (See Williams v. State, 5 Tex. Cr. App. 230; Shores v. State, 68 Tex. Cr. R. 44 , 150 S. W. 904 ; Sawyers v. State, 48 S. W. 512 ; Parchman v. State, 2 Tex. Cr. App. 228; Neiderluck v. State, 21 Tex. Cr. App. 320, 17 S. … W. 467 ; Brown v. State, 28 Tex. Cr. App. 65, 11 S. W. 1022 ; Harrison v. State, 48 Tex. Cr. R. 44 , 85 S. W. 1058 ; Ciulla v. State, No. 12,948, opinion March 12, 1930; Vernon’s C. C.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Guillory v. State

    557 S.W.2d 118 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 26, 1977

    Illinois, 351 U.S. 12 , 76 S.Ct. 585 , 100 L.Ed. 891 (1956); Lane v. Brown, 372 U.S. 477 , 83 S.Ct. 768 , 9 L.Ed.2d 892 (1963); Eskridge v. Washington, 357 U.S. 214 , 78 S.Ct. 1061 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1269 (1958); Draper v. … Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353 , 83 S.Ct. 814 , 9 L.Ed.2d 811 (1963); Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); Lopez v. State, 486 S.W.2d 559 (Tex.Cr.App.1972); Currie v.

    Cited 58 timesPublished
  • Ex Parte Medellin

    280 S.W.3d 854 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jul 31, 2008

    PRICE, J., concurring statement in which HOLCOMB and COCHRAN, JJ., joined except as to Part V. … Medellin v. United States, Case 12.644, Inter-Am. C.H.R., Report No. 45/08 OEA/ Ser/L/V/II.132, doc. 21 (2008). . TexCode Crim. Proc. art. 11.071, § 5. . U.S. Const, art.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Allen, Ex Parte Billy Frederick

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 4, 2009

    establishing that . . . by a preponderance of the evidence, but for a violation of the United States Constitution, no rational jury could have found the applicant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.”). 3 Ex parte Brown … As Jones v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gilliam v. State

    126 Tex. Crim. 425 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 6, 1934

    Appellant was a member of the Board of Trustees of Daniel Baker College. … In Boles v. State, 288 S.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Gates v. State

    162 Tex. Crim. 327 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 4, 1956

    Inspector Pierce of the Texas Liquor Control Board testified that he observed the appellant drive up to a cafe in the city of Abilene and signal to one Harris who was inside. … Hammond v. State, 138 Texas Cr. R. 641, 137 S.W. 2d 1025 . .Finding no reversible error, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Vander Boegh v. Bank of Oklahoma, N.A.

    394 S.W.3d 917 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 8, 2013

    Louisville and Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer Dist. v. Bischoff, 248 S.W.3d 533, 586 (Ky.2007) (quoting Brown v. Commonwealth, 551 S.W.2d 557, 559 (Ky.1977)). … Luke Hosp., Inc. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Timberlake v. State

    128 Tex. Crim. 63 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 19, 1934

    See Moncla v. State, 70 S. W. Rep., 548 ; Morris v. State, 48 Texas Crim. Rep., 562 . It is also held that if the place of business is open for traffic on Sunday, it is immaterial whether a sale was made or not. … Brown v. State, 38 Texas Crim. Rep., 597 ; Armstrong v. State, 47 Texas Crim. Rep., 510 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Stanley v. State

    678 S.W.2d 80 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jul 18, 1984

    Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443 , 73 S.Ct. 397 , 97 L.Ed. 469 (1953); Taylor v. Louisiana, 419 U.S. 522 , 95 S.Ct. 692 , 42 L.Ed.2d 690 (1974); Ballard v. United States, 329 U.S. 187 , 67 S.Ct. 261 , 91 L.Ed. 181 (1946). … And, as set forth in Peters v. Kiff and Taylor v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Bullard v. State

    533 S.W.2d 812 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 3, 1976

    See Jesko v. State, 458 S.W.2d 927 (Tex.Cr.App., 1970); Smith v. State, 518 S.W.2d 823 (Tex.Cr.App., 1975). See Barnes v. … Brown v. State, 475 S.W.2d 938 (Tex.Cr.App.1971); Harris v. State, 457 S.W.2d 903 (1970), reversed on other grounds, 403 U.S. 947 , 91 S.Ct. 2291 , 29 L.Ed.2d 859 (1971); McDonald v.

    Overruled in part by Cooper v. State, 1982 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 888 (1982)Cited 60 timesPublished
  • Gonzales, Alejandro Farias

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 12, 2022

    Gonzales v. State, No. 01-08- 00173-CR (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] July 16, 2009). … Copies of this order shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles. Filed: January 12, 2022 Do not publish

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Skinner v. State

    144 Tex. Crim. 648 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 28, 1942

    See McIntosh v. State, 85 Tex. Cr. R. 417 ; Shipp v. State, 132 Tex. Cr. R. 274 ; Hart v. State, 138 S. W. (2d) 818 . … See Martinez v. State, 140 S. W. (2d) 187 ; Johnson v. State, 143 S. W. (2d) 771 ; Reed v. State, 144 S. W. (2d) 268 ; Brown v. State, 158 S. W. (2d) 1018 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Herrera v. State

    561 S.W.2d 175 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 25, 1978

    While the ‘mere evidence’ rule was followed by this court for a time, recent cases have followed the reasoning of the United States Supreme Court in Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. Hayden, supra, e. g., Brown v. … Oubre v. State, supra; Phenix v. State, supra; Haynes v. State, supra. 2 The appellants’ first contention is overruled.

    Cited 55 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.