Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
9,209 results
5.30s
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 2, 2015
James Friend v. … James Friend v.
Cited 0 timesPublished147 Tex. Crim. 481 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 21, 1944
He went to *484 a certain barber shop and there a negro not known to Pleasant— so he claimed — handed him a brown paper bag which contained many envelopes and into which Pleasant put his envelope. … This same contention was made in Schwarz, v. State, 136 Tex. Cr. R. 260 , 124 S. W. (2d) 392 ; Canizares v. State, 143 Tex. Cr. R. 76 , 157 S. W. (2d) 385 ; Hill v. State, 143 Tex. Cr. R. 412 , 158 S.
Cited 2 timesPublished462 S.W.2d 578 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 31, 1970
First, it would appear that Hart v. … Johnson v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 418 S.W.2d 834 ; De La Rosa v. State, 167 Tex.Cr.R. 28 , 317 S.W.2d 544 . See also Edwards v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 427 S.W.2d 629 .
Cited 17 timesPublished107 Tex. Crim. 101 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 24, 1926
They separated as they approached the car, and the appellant was standing by the car near the door with his foot on the running-board and talking to one of the men who was drilling a well. … See Jacobs v. State, 28 Tex. Crim. App. 79, and cases collated in Vernon’s Tex. Crim. Stat., 1925, Vol. 1, p. 283.
Cited 2 timesPublished683 S.W.2d 411 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Sep 26, 1984
When asked what vehicle he had driven to the club, appellant responded that he had arrived in a brown Ford LTD. The officers requested that appellant come outside so they could talk to him. … In Belton v.
Overruled on other grounds by State v. Guzman, 1998 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 12 (1998)Cited 121 timesPublished163 Tex. Crim. 519 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 17, 1956
Under and by authority of a search warrant, agents of the Texas Liquor Control Board, together with the sheriff, searched the private residence of appellant for intoxicating liquor. … Ennox v. State, 130 Tex. Cr. R. 328 , 94 S.W. 2d 473 ; Powell v. State, 100 Tex. Cr. R. 43 , 271 S.W. 913 ; Gilbreath v. State, 158 Tex. Cr. R. 616 , 259 S.W. 2d 223 . The facts in the case of Dodd v. State, 149 Tex.
Cited 6 timesPublished795 S.W.2d 199 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 20, 1990
See Savant v. State, 535 S.W.2d 190, 192 (Tex.Crim.App.1976); Richie v. … Shaw v. State, 539 S.W.2d 887, 890 (Tex.Crim.App. 1976); Ex parte Brown, 477 S.W.2d 552, 554 (Tex.Crim. App.1972). See also Hurley v. State, 606 S.W.2d 887 , 888 n. 1 (Tex.Crim.App.1980). Cf. Homan v.
Cited 125 timesPublished115 Tex. Crim. 418 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 15, 1930
(See Williams v. State, 5 Tex. Cr. App. 230; Shores v. State, 68 Tex. Cr. R. 44 , 150 S. W. 904 ; Sawyers v. State, 48 S. W. 512 ; Parchman v. State, 2 Tex. Cr. App. 228; Neiderluck v. State, 21 Tex. Cr. App. 320, 17 S. … W. 467 ; Brown v. State, 28 Tex. Cr. App. 65, 11 S. W. 1022 ; Harrison v. State, 48 Tex. Cr. R. 44 , 85 S. W. 1058 ; Ciulla v. State, No. 12,948, opinion March 12, 1930; Vernon’s C. C.
Cited 18 timesPublished557 S.W.2d 118 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 26, 1977
Illinois, 351 U.S. 12 , 76 S.Ct. 585 , 100 L.Ed. 891 (1956); Lane v. Brown, 372 U.S. 477 , 83 S.Ct. 768 , 9 L.Ed.2d 892 (1963); Eskridge v. Washington, 357 U.S. 214 , 78 S.Ct. 1061 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1269 (1958); Draper v. … Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353 , 83 S.Ct. 814 , 9 L.Ed.2d 811 (1963); Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); Lopez v. State, 486 S.W.2d 559 (Tex.Cr.App.1972); Currie v.
Cited 58 timesPublished280 S.W.3d 854 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jul 31, 2008
PRICE, J., concurring statement in which HOLCOMB and COCHRAN, JJ., joined except as to Part V. … Medellin v. United States, Case 12.644, Inter-Am. C.H.R., Report No. 45/08 OEA/ Ser/L/V/II.132, doc. 21 (2008). . TexCode Crim. Proc. art. 11.071, § 5. . U.S. Const, art.
Cited 12 timesPublishedAllen, Ex Parte Billy Frederick
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 4, 2009
establishing that . . . by a preponderance of the evidence, but for a violation of the United States Constitution, no rational jury could have found the applicant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.”). 3 Ex parte Brown … As Jones v.
Cited 0 timesPublished126 Tex. Crim. 425 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 6, 1934
Appellant was a member of the Board of Trustees of Daniel Baker College. … In Boles v. State, 288 S.
Cited 1 timesPublished162 Tex. Crim. 327 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 4, 1956
Inspector Pierce of the Texas Liquor Control Board testified that he observed the appellant drive up to a cafe in the city of Abilene and signal to one Harris who was inside. … Hammond v. State, 138 Texas Cr. R. 641, 137 S.W. 2d 1025 . .Finding no reversible error, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Cited 1 timesPublishedVander Boegh v. Bank of Oklahoma, N.A.
394 S.W.3d 917 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 8, 2013
Louisville and Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer Dist. v. Bischoff, 248 S.W.3d 533, 586 (Ky.2007) (quoting Brown v. Commonwealth, 551 S.W.2d 557, 559 (Ky.1977)). … Luke Hosp., Inc. v.
Cited 2 timesPublished128 Tex. Crim. 63 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 19, 1934
See Moncla v. State, 70 S. W. Rep., 548 ; Morris v. State, 48 Texas Crim. Rep., 562 . It is also held that if the place of business is open for traffic on Sunday, it is immaterial whether a sale was made or not. … Brown v. State, 38 Texas Crim. Rep., 597 ; Armstrong v. State, 47 Texas Crim. Rep., 510 .
Cited 0 timesPublished678 S.W.2d 80 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jul 18, 1984
Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443 , 73 S.Ct. 397 , 97 L.Ed. 469 (1953); Taylor v. Louisiana, 419 U.S. 522 , 95 S.Ct. 692 , 42 L.Ed.2d 690 (1974); Ballard v. United States, 329 U.S. 187 , 67 S.Ct. 261 , 91 L.Ed. 181 (1946). … And, as set forth in Peters v. Kiff and Taylor v.
Cited 2 timesPublished533 S.W.2d 812 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 3, 1976
See Jesko v. State, 458 S.W.2d 927 (Tex.Cr.App., 1970); Smith v. State, 518 S.W.2d 823 (Tex.Cr.App., 1975). See Barnes v. … Brown v. State, 475 S.W.2d 938 (Tex.Cr.App.1971); Harris v. State, 457 S.W.2d 903 (1970), reversed on other grounds, 403 U.S. 947 , 91 S.Ct. 2291 , 29 L.Ed.2d 859 (1971); McDonald v.
Overruled in part by Cooper v. State, 1982 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 888 (1982)Cited 60 timesPublishedCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 12, 2022
Gonzales v. State, No. 01-08- 00173-CR (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] July 16, 2009). … Copies of this order shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles. Filed: January 12, 2022 Do not publish
Cited 0 timesPublished144 Tex. Crim. 648 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 28, 1942
See McIntosh v. State, 85 Tex. Cr. R. 417 ; Shipp v. State, 132 Tex. Cr. R. 274 ; Hart v. State, 138 S. W. (2d) 818 . … See Martinez v. State, 140 S. W. (2d) 187 ; Johnson v. State, 143 S. W. (2d) 771 ; Reed v. State, 144 S. W. (2d) 268 ; Brown v. State, 158 S. W. (2d) 1018 .
Cited 1 timesPublished561 S.W.2d 175 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 25, 1978
While the ‘mere evidence’ rule was followed by this court for a time, recent cases have followed the reasoning of the United States Supreme Court in Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. Hayden, supra, e. g., Brown v. … Oubre v. State, supra; Phenix v. State, supra; Haynes v. State, supra. 2 The appellants’ first contention is overruled.
Cited 55 timesPublished
Ask Donna