Case law

Sweed v. State

538 S.W.2d 119 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 30, 1976

We follow Price v. … McDaniel v. State, 165 Tex.Cr.R. 402 , 308 S.W.2d 24, 26 (1957); Stallworth v. State, 148 Tex.Cr.R. 255 , 186 S.W.2d 252, 255 (1945). See, also, Hartman v. State, 507 S.W.2d 557, 560-561 (Tex.Cr.App.1974).

McManus v. State

591 S.W.2d 505 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 5, 1979

See Brown v. State, 516 S.W.2d 145 (Tex.Cr.App.1974); Klinedinst v. State, 159 Tex.Cr.R. 510 , 265 S.W.2d 593 (1953). This ground of error is overruled. … See Mott v. State, supra; Brown v. State, supra; Martinez v. State, 507 S.W.2d 223 (Tex.Cr.App.1974).

Wade, Alex Melvin Jr.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Sep 10, 2008

Morrissey v. Brewer , 408 U.S. 471, 485 (1972). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez , 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. … In addition, the trial court shall order the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles to file an affidavit explaining whether it has given Applicant his constitutionally mandated preliminary hearing and, if not, its reasons for

Myers, Charles

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 23, 2008

See Meyers v. State , No AP-03-06-00661-CR (Tex. App.- Austin, 2006, no pet.) (not designated for publication.) … He also complains about the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles has failed to release him on parole.

Ex Parte McLoud

82 Tex. Crim. 299 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 14, 1917

They were held not to repeal in Townser v. State, 79 Texas Crim. Rep., 4 , 182 S. W. … S.), 886, 22 Cyc., 520-521; State v. Miller, 144 S. W. Rep., 809 .

Hancock v. State

123 Tex. Crim. 154 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 15, 1933

Phillips v. State, 6 Texas App., 364; Hatch v. … In Weatherred v. State, 272 S.

Bradford v. State

873 S.W.2d 15 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 9, 1993

See Battie v. Estelle, 655 F.2d 692 , 702 n. 22 (5th Cir.1981). In Buchanan v. … This premise misses the entire rationale explicated in Buchanan, Byers, and Brown. It is not the nature or name of the psychiatric test involved that is-important.

Mitchell, Otis Samuel

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Aug 19, 2020

Mitchell v. State, Nos. 09-15-00162-CR, 09-15-00164- CR & 09-15-00164-CR (Tex. App.—Beaumont May 4, 2016) (not designated for publication). … Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles. Delivered: August 19, 2020 Do not publish

Carroll v. State

159 Tex. Crim. 386 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 10, 1954

Under the facts herein shown, as found in his Bill of Exception No. 1, he cites the case of Jimenez v. State, 100 Tex. Cr. R. 563 , 272 S.W. 153 . … See Kuhn v. State, 142 Tex. Cr. R. 40 , 151 S.W. (2d) 208 ; Ex parte Brown, 145 Tex. Cr. R. 39 , 165 S.W. (2d) 718 . As thus reformed, the judgment herein is affirmed.

McPherson v. State

79 Tex. Crim. 93 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 19, 1916

Heely v. State, 56 S. W. Rep., 625 ; Croomes v. State, 40 Texas Crim. Rep., 672 ; Kenney v. State, 79 S. W. Rep., 817 ; Hunter v. State, 54 Texas Crim. Rep., 224 ; Thomas v. State, 47 Texas Crim. Rep., 534 . … (Jackson v. State, 28 Texas Crim. App., 370; Brown v. State, 56 Texas Crim. Rep., 87 .)

Clemons, Louis Ramon

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Aug 23, 2023

Clemons v. State, No. 01- 16-00336-CR (Tex. App.–Houston[1st], Aug. 17, 2017). He filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. … Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles. Delivered: AUGUST 23, 2023 Do not publish

Carney, Ex Parte Michael Leonard

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 16, 2013

V, VI, and XIV." … See, e.g. , Ex parte Brown , 158 S.W.3d 449, 456-57 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (finding that the trial court's refusal to consider the entire range of punishment violated due process). 4. Tex. Code Crim.

Zapata, Ex Parte Mark Anthony

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 10, 2007

See generally Gardner v. State , 164 S.W.3d 393 (Tex.Cr.App. 2005). … See Brown , 205 S.W.3d at 545 ; Ex parte Elizondo , 947 S.W.2d 202 , 206 (Tex.Cr.App. 1996).

Countryman, Ex Parte Donald Eugene

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 13, 2007

The trial court quoted State v. Condran , 951 S.W.2d 178, 192 (Tex. … The parole board is required to hold a hearing to determine whether the revocation of parole is based on verified facts, however, the board can revoke parole even if the parolee has not been indicted for the offense alleged

Bodden, Derek Andrew

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 26, 2020

Jones v. State, 98 S.W.3d 700 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003); Ex parte Riley, 193 S.W.3d 900 (Tex. Crim. … Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles. Delivered: February 26, 2020 Do not publish

Barrera v. State

157 Tex. Crim. 49 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 27, 1952

The chief contention made on this appeal is based on the complaint that the State Liquor Control Board officers who made the arrest searched appellant’s car without a search warrant. … It appears to be the same error and the same objection which this court passed upon in Green v. State, 154 Texas Crim. Rep. 197 , 226 S.W. 2d 454 .

Martinez v. State

127 S.W.3d 792 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 18, 2004

Lopez v. State, 384 S.W.2d 345, 348 . See also Lego v. … While Appellant testified that what he perceived as a promise by Detective Brown induced him to admit his guilt, he did not testify that his admission was false.” Martinez v.

Smith v. State

97 Tex. Crim. 656 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 25, 1924

The subject of the theft was a part of a sulky plow, the parts omitted being a mold-board and thribble tree. At the time the plow was taken it had been used. … Martinez v. State, 16 Texas Crim. App., 123; Keipp v. State, 51 Texas Crim. Rep., 417 ; Cunningham v. State, 90 Texas Crim. Rep., 500 .

Hay v. State

436 S.W.2d 153 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 18, 1968

Upon arrival at the pound, the driver (Officer Howe) removed the mud, placed it in a brown envelope, marked it for identification and placed it in the evidence room in the city hall. … Taylor v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 421 S.W.2d 403 . The evidence sufficiently traces the chain of custody of the articles seized and authorized their admission in evidence.

Gaskin v. State

172 Tex. Crim. 7 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 13, 1961

Jackson v. State, 166 Tex.Cr.R. 348 , 314 S.W.2d 97 ; Green v. State, 53 Tex.Cr.R. 490 , 110 S.W. 920 , 22 L.R.A.,N.S., 706; Palacio v. State, 164 Tex.Cr.R. 460 , 301 S.W.2d 166 ; Board v. … In Kilpatrick v.