Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterstexcrimapp

9,209 results

3.73s

  • Lopez v. State

    482 S.W.2d 179 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 21, 1972

    See Slaughter v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 439 S.W.2d 836 . Absent objections or a showing that one did not have an opportunity to object at the time the evidence was offered, nothing is presented for review. … Brown v. *183 State, Tex.Cr.App., 460 S.W.2d 925 . See United States v. Lazarus, 425 F.2d 638 (9th Cir. 1970), for a discussion of waiver of constitutional questions for failure to object, and United States v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Standfield v. State

    84 Tex. Crim. 437 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 22, 1919

    Shinault he did not then remember just where he did board, but that part of the time he boarded at the jail with Mr. Baccus. … Zollicoffer v. State, 16 Texas Crim. App., 317.” In Hankins v. State, 47 S. W.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Walker v. State

    103 Tex. Crim. 555 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 24, 1926

    The state’s testimony shows that the appellant came to the boarding house of the prosecutrix and represented to her that he desired to employ her to nurse his baby and act as a companion for his wife, and believing said representation … Rep. 80; Greer v. State, 222 S. W. 986 ; Cano v. State, 225 S. W. 1097 ; Hunt v. State, 229 S. W. 873 ; Gregory v. State, 244 S. W. 617 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Graves, Harold L Jr

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 28, 2023

    Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). … Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Whitworth v. State

    153 Tex. Crim. 455 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 8, 1949

    Conviction is for driving a motor vehicle upon a public highway in Brown County, Texas, while intoxicated, penalty assessed at a fine of $100.00. The state’s evidence supports the verdict and judgment. … Sue v. State, 52 Texas Crim. Rep. 122 , 105 S. W. 804 ; Hunter v. State, 59 Tex. Crim. Rep. 439, 129 S. W. 131 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Nelson v. State

    765 S.W.2d 401 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 25, 1989

    Brown v. State, 617 S.W.2d 234, 236 (Tex.Cr.App. 1981). … In Brown v.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Hutchinson, Henry Lee

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jul 2, 2025

    Hutchinson v. State, No. 10-13-00120-CR (Tex. App.—Waco Apr. 17, 2014) (not designated for publication). … Hutchinson v. State, No. 06-23-00086-CR (Tex. App.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Quintana v. State

    485 S.W.2d 281 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 28, 1972

    Quintana v. State, 441 S.W.2d 191 . … Quintana v. Texas, 403 U.S. 947 , 91 S.Ct. 2284 , 29 L.Ed.2d 857 (1972).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • in Re State of Texas Ex Rel, Tharp, Jennifer

    393 S.W.3d 751 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 14, 2012

    State, 481 S.W.2d 851, 853 (Tex.Crim.App.1972) (itali *757 cizing the same language for the same proposition); Brown v. State, 507 S.W.2d 235, 237 (Tex.Crim.App.1974) (same). . Ring, 450 S.W.2d at 87 ; see also Brown v. … Holland v. State, 761 S.W.2d 307, 313 (Tex.Crim.App.1988). . Carroll v. State, 42 S.W.3d 129 , 134 n. 1 (Tex.Crim.App.2001). . State v. Davis, 349 S.W.3d 535, 540 (Tex.Crim.App.2011) (quoting Carroll v.

    Cited 49 timesPublished
  • Scroggins v. State

    97 Tex. Crim. 573 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 18, 1924

    Richardson v. Satte, (Tex. Crim.) 27 S. W., 139 ; Wilson v. State, 54 Texas Crim. Rep., 505 , 113 S. W., 529 ; Dorrs v. State, 40 S. W., 311 ; Gaines v. State, 53 S. W., 625 ; Eads v. State, 147 S. W., 593 ; Brown v. … W., 565 ; Swilley v. State, 75 Texas Crim. Rep., 409 , 166 S. W., 733 . For the errors committed, this judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded. Reversed and remanded.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Ex parte Frazier

    67 S.W.3d 189 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 27, 2001

    See Francis v. State, 86 S.W.3d 121, 125 (Tex.Crim.App.2000). … See id; Brown v. State, 508 S.W.2d 91 (Tex.Crim.App.1974); Tex. Const, art. V, § 13. The discussion above demonstrates the potential merit in applicant’s claim.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Graves v. State

    118 Tex. Crim. 591 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 8, 1931

    He also saw a man, whom he claimed to have been in the store, jump on the running board of said car. He fired five shots out of his automatic pistol at the car, on the running board of which he had seen the man jump. … Ortiz v. State, 68 Texas Crim. Rep., 608 , 151 S. W., 1059 ; Harris v. State, 67 Texas Crim. Rep., 251 , 148 S. W., 1074 ; Livar v. State, 26 Texas *595 App., 115; Black v. State, 68 Texas Crim. Rep., 151 , 151 S.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Martin v. State

    449 S.W.2d 257 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 21, 1970

    He described the appellant as being a “white-male, thirty, five foot, ten inches, 165 pounds, sandy hair, wearing a light brown sport coat and carrying a knife.” … See Martinez v. State, supra; Evans v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 444 S.W.2d 641 ; Lucas v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Henry v. State

    136 Tex. Crim. 22 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 23, 1938

    During the conversation, one of the women accused the deceased of being a “snooper” for the Liquor *24 Control Board. … In support of the views herein expressed, we refer to the following authorities: Bazan v. State, 12 S. W. (2d), 788 ; Briggs v. State, 255 S. W., 410 ; Johnson v. State, 117 S.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Hardin v. State

    471 S.W.2d 60 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 6, 1971

    Washington v. Texas, 388 U.S. 14 , 87 S.Ct. 1920 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1967). In Cruz v. … Taylor v.

    Cited 49 timesPublished
  • Beauchamp v. State

    116 Tex. Crim. 217 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 15, 1930

    The rule has also been applied in the following recent cases: Gifford v. State, 101 Tex.Crim. R.; Tuckness v. State, 101 Tex. Crim. 483 ; Brown v. State, 101 Tex.Crim. R.. A like rule pertains to bills of exception. … McPherson v. State, 108 Tex. Crim. 265 ; Filpot v. State, 26 S.W.2d 202 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Willie v. State

    169 Tex. Crim. 393 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 16, 1960

    House, an inspector for the Texas Liquor Control Board, purchased one-half pint of whisky for $2.50 from the appellant in Kaufman County which he marked for identification purposes ; and while House was testifying as a witness … Wortham v. State, No. 31,529, (page 164, this volume) 333 S.W. 2d 158 . *395 The other contentions presented have been considered and they do not reveal error.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Mills v. State

    508 S.W.2d 823 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 8, 1974

    Art. 36.15, 38.04, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P.; *827 Brown v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 477 S.W.2d 617 ; Easley v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 478 S. W.2d 539 . … Jones v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 442 S.W.2d 698 ; Frison v. State, Tex.Cr. App., 473 S.W.2d 479 ; Parish v. State, 85 Tex.Cr.R. 75 , 209 S.W. 678 ; Finch v. State, 89 Tex.Cr.R. 363 , 232 S.W. 528 .

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Weatherly, Rohn M

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 15, 2023

    Weatherly v. State, No. 02-16-0026-CR (Tex. App.—Fort Worth, Dec. 8, 2016) (not designated for publication). … Brady v. United States, 397 U.S. 742 (1970).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rhoades v. State

    138 Tex. Crim. 14 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 22, 1939

    This was turned over to a representative of the Texas Liquor Control Board who introduced it in evidence upon the trial of the case. … See Fawcett v. State, 127 S. W. (2d) 905 , and cases there cited. The record contains no bill of exception bringing this issue before this Court as is considered to be the better practice.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.