Case law

Yoakum v. State

68 Tex. Crim. 254 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 23, 1912

Toliver v. State, 144 S. W. 1138 ; Hamilton v. State, 145 S. W. 349 ; Gibson v. State, 148 S. W. 1090 . … Brown v. State, 62 Tex. Cr. R. 592 , 138 S. W. 604 , and authorities therein cited; La Moyne v. State, 53 Tex. Or. R. 221, 111 S. W. 950 ; Salter v. State, 36 Tex. Cr. R. 501 , 38 S. W. 212 .

Amador, Ex Parte Manuel

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 13, 2010

v. … App. 1977); State v. York, 31 S.W.3d 798, 802 (Tex.

Luttrell v. State

65 Tex. Crim. 102 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 31, 1912

Humbard v. State, 21 Texas Crim. App., 200; Brown v. State, 53 Texas Crim. Rep., 303 ; Tracy v. State, 48 Texas Crim. Rep., 49 ; Mays v. State, 33 Texas Crim. Rep., 330 ; Wolf v. State, 48 Texas Crim. Rep., 54 , 85 S. … Gallaher v. State, 55 Texas Crim. Rep., 50 ; Hightower v. State, 56 Texas Crim. Rep., 248 ; Scott v. State, 50 Texas Crim. Rep., 386 .

Hightower v. State

56 Tex. Crim. 248 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 19, 1909

Brown, for appellant. On question of court’s failure to submit article 717, Penal Code: Johnson v. State, 44 Texas Crim. Rep., 332, 6 Texas Ct. Rep,, 327. On question of adequate cause: Brown v. … Rep., 80; McHenry v. State, 54 Texas Crim. Rep., 477, 114 S. W. Rep., 115. On question of court’s charge on threats: Pannell v. State, 54 Texas Crim. Rep., 498, 113 S. W. Rep., 536; Huddleston v.

Barefoot v. State

596 S.W.2d 875 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 12, 1980

Appellant subsequently made his way to Belton, where he boarded a bus for Houston. Police acting on information from Hernandez arrested appellant at the bus station in Houston at approximately 11:30 p. m. August 8. … In that case, the court held that "a witness may not be asked whether a testator had the mental capacity to make and publish a will because, under Brown v.

Ex Parte Alexander

861 S.W.2d 921 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Sep 29, 1993

Young v. State, 826 S.W.2d 141 (Tex.Crim.App.1991). Because of our interpretation today of Art. 11.07, § 2, we specifically disavow the dicta of Brager. … Thus, he will not be released until the Board of Pardons and Paroles deems him eligible for parole or until he serves his entire sentence.

Pate v. State

239 S.W. 967 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 12, 1922

The form of charge approved in Brown v. State, 57 Tex. Cr. R. 576 , 124 S. W. 101 , is commended. Adams v. State, 64 Tex. Cr. R. 61 , 141 S. W. 527 ; Chandler v. State, 60 Tex. Cr. R. 329 , 131 S. W. 598 . … Barton v. State, 88 Tex. Cr. R. 370 , 227 S. W. 317 , 13 A. L. R. 147; Neely v. State, 32 Tex. Cr. R. 372 , 23 S. W. 798 ; Woods v. State, 26 Tex. App. 508, 10 S. W. 108 ; Henley v. State, 61 Tex. Cr. R. 428 , 135 S.

Piester v. State

161 Tex. Crim. 436 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 9, 1955

277 S.W.2d 723 (1955) George McCall PIESTER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 27391. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. February 9, 1955. … Under our holding in Brown v. State, 156 Tex.Cr. R. 144, 240 S.W.2d 310 , it was proper for the State to show that the blood test was taken with the consent of the accused. No error is reflected by the bill.

Jones v. State

470 S.W.2d 874 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 23, 1971

Warner v. State, 118 Tex.Cr.R. 351 , 42 S.W.2d 616 ; Robertson v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 426 S.W.2d 872 . Whether a previous offense is of like character to a subsequent offense is a matter of law for the court. Brown v. … Keel v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 434 S.W.2d 687 ; Shirden v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 439 S.W.2d 348 ; Dailey v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 436 S.W.2d 346 ; Evans v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 456 S.W.2d 911 .

O'Brien v. State

83 Tex. Crim. 39 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 13, 1918

Dooms v. State, 77 Texas Crim. Rep., 206 ; Denman v. State, 77 Texas Crim. Rep., 256 ; Williams v. State, 53 Texas Crim. Rep., 396 ; Tracy v. State, 42 Texas Crim. Rep., 494 ; Stone v. State, 22 Texas Crim. … There is evidence that she kept a boarding house and had boarders. Outside of this there is no testimony that shows she was the lessee or tenant.

Witty v. State

75 Tex. Crim. 440 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 4, 1914

In that case appellant defended on the ground of insanity, claiming that he, Merritt, killed Brown under the insane delusion that a mob was after him to kill him, and Brown was the leader of that mob. … He sought to introduce evidence that Brown was the ■ leader of the mob.

Hoover v. State

107 Tex. Crim. 600 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 8, 1927

Also see Russell v. State, 228 S. W. 949 , and McCulley v. State, 280 S. W. 223 . … See Cornelius on Search and Seizure, section 12, page 62; Essgee Co. v. U. S., 262 U. S. 151 , 67 L. Ed. 917 ; Dozier v. State, 289 S. W. 45 , and McFarlan v. State, 292 S. W. 885 .

Morgan v. State

688 S.W.2d 504 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 6, 1985

App.1982); Galitz v. State, 617 S.W.2d 949 (Tex.Cr.App.1981); Brown v. State, 617 S.W.2d 196 (Tex.Cr.App.1981). … See also Foster v. State, 422 S.W.2d 447 (Tex.Cr.App.1967); Brown v. State, supra, and cases there cited.

Calderon, Domingo Iii

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 27, 2008

See Ex parte Brown , 205 S.W.3d 538, 545 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). … If the trial court finds that the 2005 recantation was not disclosed, it shall determine whether the State violated Brady v. Maryland , 373 U.S. 83 (1963).

Nelson v. State

573 S.W.2d 9 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 25, 1978

See e. g., Dickson v. State, 113 S.W.2d 528 (Tex.Cr.App.). In O’Briant v. … Waddell v. State, 503 S.W.2d 570 (Tex.Cr.App.1974); Brown v. State, 478 S.W.2d 550 (Tex.Cr.App.1972); Hall v. State, 418 S.W.2d 810 (Tex.Cr.App.1967). The judgment is affirmed. 1 . V.T.C.A.

Ex parte Chaddock

369 S.W.3d 880 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 27, 2012

United States, 450 U.S. 333, 337-38, 340-42 , 101 S.Ct. 1137 , 67 L.Ed.2d 275 (1981) (multiple punishments); Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161 , 166 & n. 6, 97 S.Ct. 2221 , 53 L.Ed.2d 187 (1977) (successive prosecutions). . … Id.; accord United States v.

Martinez v. State

178 S.W.3d 806 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 2, 2005

See Brown v. State, 649 S.W.2d 160, 162 (Tex.App.Austin 1983, no pet.). 11 Because of the confusion concerning the appropriate scope and application of Articles 38.072 and 38.07, we granted review. II. … See Brown v. State, 649 S.W.2d 160, 162 (Tex.App.-Austin 1983, no pet.) (“The witness’ testimony is admissible to show that the complaint was made and the basic nature of the complaint.

Chinske v. State

71 S.W.2d 874 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 2, 1934

Worbes v. State, 71 S.W.(2d) 872 , recently decided by this court. … Keefe, Brown McCallum, and R. W. Dalby that the appellant’s reputation for honesty, uprightness, and fair dealing was good, etc.

Spencer, Benjamin John

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 22, 2009

Ex parte Brown , 205 S.W.3d 538 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Specifically, the trial court shall make findings as to what methods in visual forensic science Dr. … App. 1996); Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 608 (1984). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez , 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim.

Poore, Shawn Paul

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 15, 2025

See Hernandez v. State, 929 S.W.2d 11, 13 (Tex. Crim. … Brady v. United States, 397 U.S. 742 (1970).