Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterstexcrimapp

9,209 results

0.81s

  • Mason v. State

    133 Tex. Crim. 366 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 13, 1937

    . — In his motion for rehearing appellant insists that we were in error in holding that the inspectors of the Liquor Control Board were not accomplice witnesses. … In support of the conclusion announced in the original opinion herein we cited Stevens v. State, Opinion No. 18,823, delivered October 13, 1937.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Palomares, Alexander Gonzalez

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 12, 2026

    Palomares v. State, 07-24-00249-CR (Tex. App.—Amarillo Aug. 28, 2025)(not designated for publication). … Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles. 3 Delivered: February 12, 2026 Do

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Spencer v. State

    52 Tex. Crim. 289 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 18, 1907

    See Clay v. State, 40 Texas Crim. Rep., 556; 51 S. W. Rep., 212; Dungan v. State, 39 Texas Crim. Rep., 115 , and Cohea v. State, 11 Texas Crim. … See Brown v. State, 16 Texas Crim. App., 197, and Rutherford v. State, 13 Texas Crim. App., 92. Por the errors pointed out, the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded. Reversed and remanded.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Zone, Terry Wayne

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 22, 2003

    IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. 1553-02 TERRY WAYNE ZONE, Appellant v. … See Judge Harvey Brown, Procedural Issues Under Daubert , 36 Hous. L. Rev. 1133 , 1153-1158 (1999).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Jacobs, Walter Lee

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 15, 2025

    Jacobs v. State, No. 05-22-00248-CR (Tex. App.—Dallas del. Aug. 31, 2023) (not designated for publication). … Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles. Delivered: January 15, 2025 Do not publish

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pemberton v. State

    601 S.W.2d 333 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jul 16, 1980

    However, the State may not ask whether the witness had personal knowledge of the act, nor may the question be framed so as to imply that the act has actually been committed.” 555 S.W.2d at 439 , quoting Brown v. … Thomas v. State, supra; Alvarez v. State, supra. The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded. Before the Court en banc. .

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Janicek v. State

    634 S.W.2d 687 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 9, 1982

    In this connection, both sides begin with Brown v. … Chapin v.

    Cited 52 timesPublished
  • Jarvis v. State

    133 Tex. Crim. 361 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 13, 1937

    . — In his motion for rehearing appellant insists that we were in error in holding that the inspectors of the Liquor Control Board were not accomplice witnesses. … In support of the conclusion announced in the original-opinion herein we cited Stevens v. State, Opinion No. 18,823, delivered October 13, 1937.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Poore, Shawn Paul

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 15, 2025

    See Hernandez v. State, 929 S.W.2d 11, 13 (Tex. Crim. … Brady v. United States, 397 U.S. 742 (1970).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Seeger, Justin Uriah

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 26, 2026

    Seeger v. State, No. 12-24-00166-CR (Tex. App.—Tyler May 21, 2025, no pet.). … Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles. Delivered: February 26, 2026 Do not publish

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Stone v. State

    612 S.W.2d 542 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 11, 1981

    In Brewer v. … When shown a photograph of Vicky Gill’s motorcycle, Brown stated that it resembled the one she had seen by the side of the road.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Wells v. State

    63 Tex. Crim. 618 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 15, 1911

    Turner v. State, 16 Texas Crim. App., 378; Stanley v. State, 16 Texas Crim. App., 392; Hinton v. State, 24 Texas, 454 . Reasonable force must be used. McCray v. State, 38 Texas Crim. Rep., 609 . … And it was held in Sargent v. State, 35 Texas Crim.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Farris v. Texas

    155 Tex. Crim. 261 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 25, 1950

    See Warner v. State, 118 Tex. Cr. R. 351 , 42 S.W. (2d) 616 ; Brown v. State, 140 Tex. Cr. R. 133 , 143 S.W. (2d) 775 . … See Whittle v. State, 147 Tex. Cr. R. 227 , 179 S.W. (2d) 569 ; Strickland v. State, 115 Tex. Cr. R. 410 , 28 S.W. (2d) 818 ; Warner v. State, 118 Tex. Cr. R. 351 , 42 S.W. (2d) 616 ; Palmer v. State, 128 Tex. Cr.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Cruz v. State

    100 Tex. Crim. 188 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 11, 1925

    Johnson v. State, 35 S. W. Rep. 387 ; Pilgrim v. State, 59 Texas Crim. Rep. 231 ; Bost v. State, 64 Texas Crim. Rep. 464 ; Giles v. State, 148 S. W. Rep. 317 . … Cunningham v. State, 20 Texas Crim. App. 162; Harvey v. State, 21 Texas Crim. App. 178; Browning v. State, 26 Texas Crim. App. 432; Green v. State, 36 Texas Crim. Rep. 109 ; Singleton v. State, 57 Texas Crim. Rep. 560 .

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Diaz, Jose Angel

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 5, 2025

    Diaz v. State, No. 13-22-00602-CR (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi- Edinburg Aug. 15, 2024)(not designated for publication). … Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles. Delivered: March 5, 2025 Do not publish

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Smith v. State

    61 Tex. Crim. 225 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 15, 1911

    In Jackson v. State, 29 Texas Crim. … Walker v. State, 2 Texas *227 Crim. App., 326; Allison v. State, 14 Texas Crim. App., 122; Weller v. State, 16 Texas Crim. App., 200; Brown v. State, 26 Texas Crim. App., 308; Musgrave v. State, 28 Texas Crim. App., 57.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Branch v. State

    477 S.W.2d 893 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 22, 1972

    Nalls v. State, 476 S.W.2d 297 (Tex.Cr.App.1972); Aguilar v. State, 471 S.W.2d 58 (Tex.Cr.App.1971); Maddox v. State, 466 S.W.2d 755 (Tex.Cr.App.1971); Ellis v. State, 456 S.W.2d 398 (Tex.Cr.App.1970); Hulsey v. … The officers saw two brown paper bags near the Robitussin bottles. They looked inside the bags and saw plant-like substance they believed to be marihuana.

    Overruled on other grounds by Heath v. State, 1991 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 221 (1991)Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Sanchez, Roy

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Sep 18, 2024

    Sanchez v. State, No. 10-22-00276-CR (Tex. App.—Waco Nov. 30, 2023) (not designated for publication). … Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles. Delivered: September 18, 2024 Do not publish

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Thurmond v. State

    441 S.W.2d 528 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 21, 1969

    Daniels v. State, 167 Tex.Cr.R. 219 , 319 S.W.2d 321 . … The appellant contends that the state’s attorney committed error by injecting into his argument before the jury that, if the appellant is not placed in jail he will kill somebody, and that the members of the draft board do

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Colburn v. State

    501 S.W.2d 680 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 28, 1973

    Golden v. State, 475 S.W.2d 273 (Tex.Cr.App.1971). … Griffin v. Illinois, 351 U.S. 12 , 76 S.Ct. 585 , 100 L.Ed. 891 ; Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353 , 83 S.Ct. 814 , 9 L.Ed.2d 811 ; Lane v. Brown, 372 U.S. 477 , 83 S.Ct. 768 , 9 L.Ed.2d 892 ; Draper v.

    Cited 38 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.