Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterstexcrimapp

9,209 results

1.30s

  • Palma, Alexander

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 11, 2019

    The Court concludes that the Parole Board violated the 41-day requirement for affording a parole revocation hearing. … Filed: December 11, 2019 Publish 8 United States v. Morrison, 449 U.S. 361, 364 (1981). 9 See Moody v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Broadnax v. State

    103 Tex. Crim. 160 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 20, 1926

    Brown v. State, 242 S. W. Rep. 218 . Bill No. 6 complains of the rejection of a conversation had between one Anderson and appellant on the afternoon of his arrest.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Dickinson v. State

    685 S.W.2d 320 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 5, 1984

    Recently, in Brown v. … McDaniel v. State, 524 S.W.2d 68 (Tex.Cr.App.1975); Roller v. State, 518 S.W.2d 373 (Tex.Cr.App.1975); Overstreet v. State, 470 S.W.2d 653 (Tex.Cr.App.1971).

    Cited 121 timesPublished
  • Chapa v. State

    164 Tex. Crim. 554 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 13, 1957

    Vargas v. State, 104 Texas Cr. Rep. 283 , 284 S.W. 564 ; Peddy v. State, 118 Texas Cr. Rep. 603 , 40 S.W. 2d 153 ; Smith v. State, 55 Texas Cr. Rep. 326 , 116 S.W. 572 ; Willis v. State, 141 Texas Cr. … Branch’s P.C., 2d Edition, Sec. 763, p. 62; King v. State, 35 Texas Cr. Rep. 478 , 34 S.W. 282 ; Anderson v. State, 56 Texas Cr. Rep. 360 , 120 S.W. 462 ; Brown v. State, 125 Texas Cr. Rep. 507 , 69 S.W. 2d 411 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Tucker v. State

    578 S.W.2d 409 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 21, 1979

    He cites Stiles v. … v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Holland v. State

    761 S.W.2d 307 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jul 13, 1988

    Ex Parte Williams, 703 S.W.2d 674 (Tex.Cr.App.1986), citing Williams v. State, 674 S.W.2d 315 (Tex.Cr. *313 App.1984); Brinson v. State, 570 S.W.2d 937 (Tex.Cr.App.1978); Brown v. … Brown was properly excused under Art. 35.16, supra. See Little v. State, 758 S.W.2d 551 (Tex.Cr.App.1988); Jackson v. State, 745 S.W.2d 4 (Tex.Cr.App.1988); Sawyers v. State, 724 S.W.2d 24 (Tex.Cr.App.1986).

    Cited 224 timesPublished
  • Winkles v. State

    634 S.W.2d 289 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 7, 1982

    trim and having a brown shingle roof. … In Aguilar v.

    Cited 43 timesPublished
  • Rucker v. State

    170 Tex. Crim. 487 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 25, 1961

    Barbier v. Connolly, 113 U.S. 27 , 5 S. Ct. 357 , 28 L. Ed. 923 ; Williams v. Arkansas, 217 U.S. 79 , 30 S. Ct. 493 , 54 L. Ed. 673 ; Baccus v. Louisiana, 232 U.S. 334 , 34 S. Ct. 439 , 58 L. Ed. 627 ; McCloskey v. … R. 465 , 215 S.W. 2d 170 ; Beacon Lumber Co. v. Brown, Tex. Sup. Ct., 14 S.W. 2d 1022 ; State v. Standard Oil Co. et al, 130 T. 313, 107 S.W. 2d 550, 557 ; State v. Richards, 157 T. 166, 301 S.W. 2d 597 ; Slater v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Dunning v. State

    159 Tex. Crim. 215 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 2, 1953

    Article 701 P.C. makes it an offense for any person to keep or conduct any “. . . maternity home or place for the reception, care or treatment of pregnant women without first having obtained a license from the State Board … See Soble v. State, 153 Tex. Cr. Rep. 629, 218 S.W. 2d 195 ; Spencer v. State, 154 Tex. Cr. Rep. 106, 225 S.W. 2d 174 ; Chasco v. State, 154 Tex. Cr. Rep. 239, 226 S.W. 2d 447 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Dennington v. State

    98 Tex. Crim. 332 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 8, 1924

    They are perjury cases in which it was necessary to plead and prove the materiality to some charge, of the alleged false statement; and Brown v. State, 48 S. W. Rep., 169 , and Ross v. State, 50 S. W. … Gabrielsky v. State, 13 Texas Crim.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Preble v. State

    374 S.W.2d 444 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 11, 1963

    Under the holding of this Court in Fowler v. … Gandy v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Manley v. State

    69 Tex. Crim. 169 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 19, 1913

    (Carroll v. State, 58 S. W. Rep., 340 ; Brown v. State, 24 Texas Crim. App., 170; Schwartz v. State, 53 Texas Crim. Rep., 449 ; Thompsons State, 55 Texas Crim. Rep., 120 ; Waters v. State, 54 Texas Crim. … App., 141; Johnson v. State, 44 Texas Crim. Rep., 332 ; Fielder v. State, 40 Texas Crim. Rep., 184 ; Speights v. State, 1 Texas Crim. App., 551; Brown v. State, 26 Texas Crim. App., 330.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Isbell, Lynn Allen

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 26, 2021

    CR24450-A IN THE 35TH DISTRICT COURT FROM BROWN COUNTY Per curiam. … Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Avants v. State

    171 Tex. Crim. 45 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 1, 1961

    Tippett, an undercover agent for the Texas Liquor Control Board, appellant sold him a pint of whisky for $5, at approximately 2:40 o’clock on the afternoon of April 2, 1959, in the 500-block of Cedar Street in Plainview. … Wiley v. State, 163 Tex. Cr. R. 513 , 294 S.W. 2d 118 ; Madley v. State 165 Tex. Cr. R. 83 , 307 S.W. 2d 584 ; Branch’s 2d Edition, Sec. 459, p. 457.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Morris v. State

    749 S.W.2d 772 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 30, 1986

    State, supra; East v. State, 476 S.W.2d 292 (Tex.Cr.App.1972); Brown v. State, supra; Cevalles v. State, 513 S.W.2d 865 (Tex.Cr.App.1974); York v. State, 566 S.W.2d 936 (Tex.Cr.App.1978). Cf., Prochaska v. … State, supra; Brown v. State, supra; Cevalles v. State, supra; York v. State, supra; cf., LaFlore v. State, 595 S.W.2d 862 (Tex.Cr.App.1980); Brown v. State, supra; Gary v. State, supra. . Potts v.

    Cited 52 timesPublished
  • Macaluso v. State

    167 Tex. Crim. 216 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 10, 1958

    The question presented was answered in Brown v. State, 156 Tex.Cr.R. 652 , 245 S.W.2d 497 , and in Whitehead v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cole v. State

    484 S.W.2d 779 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 21, 1972

    Whiteley v. Warden, Wyoming Penitentiary, 401 U.S. 560 , 91 S.Ct. 1031 , 28 L.Ed.2d 306 ; Beck v. Ohio, 379 U.S. 89 , 85 S.Ct. 223 , 13 L.Ed.2d 142 ; Brown v. State, 481 S.W.2d 106 (Tex.Crim.App., 1972); Fry v. … Exigent circumstances, no matter how compelling, will not justify a search where probable cause is lacking, e. g., Brown v. State, 481 S.W.2d 106 (Tex.Crim.App.1972). .

    Cited 42 timesPublished
  • Ervin, Ex Parte George Alexander

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 6, 2005

    As a result in February 2003, the Board voted to withdraw its prior vote. The Board concluded that this prior conviction made the applicant ineligible for mandatory supervision release. … Ervin v. State , 125 S.W.3d 542 (Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 2002). 3. Tex. Gov't Code § 508.149(a)(6). 4. See Griffith v. State , 116 S.W.3d 782, 787-88 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003). 5.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sharp v. State

    153 Tex. Crim. 96 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 2, 1949

    In Gardner v. State, 34 S. W. 945 , it was held that the silence of one under arrest while statements damaging to his defense are made in his presence, cannot be used against the accused. In the case of Brown v. … W. 892 ; Ripley v. State, 58 Tex. Cr. R. 489 , 126 S. W. 586 ; Johnson v. State, 272 S. W. 783 ; Williams v. State, 272 S. W. 783 ; Skirlock v. State, 272 S. W. 782 .

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Tullos v. State

    166 Tex. Crim. 44 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 12, 1958

    The witness Finger, a member of the local water board, testified that the appellant approached him on the day in question, informed him that there was going to be plenty of trouble because Jimmy Carrier had dug up his water … In the recent case of Spencer v. State, 156 Texas Cr.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.