Case law

Waldrup, Dewayne Lee

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 28, 2021

Applicant alleges that the Board of Pardons and Paroles’ and the Parole Division’s denial of a final parole revocation hearing within a reasonable time violates Due Process. Morrissey v. … The trial court shall order the Board of Pardons and Paroles’ Office of the General Counsel to obtain a response from a person with knowledge of relevant facts.

Dillard v. State

71 S.W.2d 529 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 16, 1934

Conviction is for burglary; punishment against Dillard was assessed at three years in the penitentiary, and against Brown at four years in the penitentiary. … Caddell v. State, 49 Tex. Cr. R. 138 , 90 S. W. 1014 , 122 Am. St. Rep. 806 ; Hunt v. State, 89 Tex. Cr. R. 404 , 231 S. W. 775 . Many authorities are cited in the first case mentioned.

Le Master v. State

81 Tex. Crim. 577 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 18, 1917

In Moore v. State, 6 Tex. App. 563, the question came again. … The doctrine was approved in Allen v. State, 8 Tex. App. 67, and Robins v. State, 9 Tex. App. 671. In the case of McDade v. State, 27 Tex. App. 641, 11 S. W. 672 , 11 Am. St. Rep. 216 , the question again came.

Ex Parte Matthews

488 S.W.2d 434 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 3, 1973

In Buchanan v. … Brown, supra, the Court said: “Lamb v. State, supra, is not helpful in our search for a rational justification for the disparity in treatment between 16-18 year old males and 16-18 year old females under the statute.

Kelley v. State

51 Tex. Crim. 507 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 22, 1907

See Smith v. State, 31 Texas Crim. App., 315; Anderson v. State, 24 Texas Crim. App., 705, and Cordway v. State, 25 Texas Crim. … See State v. Rowell, 72 Vt., 28 , 82 Amer. State Rep., 918, and State v. Brown, 68 New H., 200.

Harris v. State

110 Tex. Crim. 410 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 31, 1928

Gowans v. State, 145 S. W. 614 . … Baggett v. State, 144 S. W. 1136 ; Willoughby v. State, 219 S. W. 468 ; Brown v. State, 271 S. W. 917 . In the state of the record, the improper admission of the testimony complained of calls for a reversal.

Morville v. State

63 Tex. Crim. 551 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 8, 1911

Appellant’s contention seems to have some support in the case of Labbaite v. State, 6 Texas Crim. App., 483, but this case seems not to have been followed in the later decisions of this court. In the case of Brown v. … The' contention seems supported by Lab *553 baite v. State, 6 App., 483 . However, that case was overruled in the more recent case of Howard v. State, 37 Texas Crim. Rep., 494 .” Again in the case of Brod v.

Lucas v. State

134 Tex. Crim. 87 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 3, 1938

Crowley v. State, 35 S. W. (2d) 437 . It is shown in bill of exception No. 2 that Porter L. … Stevens v. State, 110 S. W. (2d) 906 . Stevens v. State, supra, is also authority supporting our conclusion that the inspectors were not accomplice witnesses.

Curbow v. State

132 S.W.2d 853 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 8, 1939

.; also Brown v. State, 136 Tex.Cr.R. 61 , 124 S.W.2d 124 ; Scott v. State, 135 Tex. Cr.R. 324, 119 S.W.2d 884 , and cases cited. The appeal is dismissed.

Trevino v. State

158 Tex. Crim. 255 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 3, 1952

Under the quotation last above is mentioned the Missouri case of State v. … R. 287 , 103 S.W. (2d) 770 , that boarding houses and hotels are open for business, but the doors thereof being closed, both back and front, and that the appellant committed the burglary of this boarding house when in his

Ex Parte Guerrero

521 S.W.2d 613 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 9, 1975

Reliance is had on Ex Parte Voelkel, 517 S.W.2d 291 (Tex.Cr.App.1975); Blackwell v. … Holmes v. State, 140 Tex.Cr.R. 619 , 146 S.W.2d 400 (1941); accord, Moxie v. State, 54 Tex.Cr.R. 529 , 114 S.W. 375 (1908).

Borroum v. State

168 Tex. Crim. 552 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 6, 1960

Well, I told, him, I said, ‘Let’s take these old boards off and put on flat boards here to where it will make a good step «■coming into the house,’ and he said, T’m not a-gonna, do it.’ [“Q. ' Then what happened?] A. … See: Mason v. State, 88 Texas Cr. Rep. 642 , 228 S.W. 952 ; Hawkins v. State, 32 S.W. 2d 202 , and authorities there cited.

Naulls v. State

115 Tex. Crim. 44 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 19, 1930

The ownership of the premises and the name of the accused occur only in the following clause of the affidavit and search warrant: “A four or five room house, painted brown, trimmed in white, said house being numbered 3314 … In the recent case, of Tillery v.

McCormick v. State

110 Tex. Crim. 214 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 6, 1928

Williams v. State, 37 Tex. Cr. R. 147 , 38 S. W. 999 ; Brown v. State, 61 Tex. Cr. R. 334 ; Chancey v. State, 58 Tex. Cr. R. 54 , 124 S. W. 426 . … Haynie v. State, 3 Tex. Cr. App. 223, Clampitt v. State, 3 Tex. Cr. App. 638, and other early decisions of this court collated in Note 2 under Article 661, Vernon’s C. C.

Maldonado, Anthony L.

461 S.W.3d 144 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 13, 2015

See also Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161, 164-69 , 97 S.Ct. 2221 , 53 L.Ed.2d 187 (1977) (elements analysis); id. at 169-70 & n.8, 97 S.Ct. 2221 (units analysis); Blockburger v. … .''); Ex parte Hawkins, 6 S.W.3d 554 , 555-56 & n.6, 557 n.8 (Tex.Crim.App. 1999) (discussing Brown and Sanabria v.

Stubbs v. State

457 S.W.2d 563 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Sep 4, 1970

Reno v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 403 S.W.2d 799 ; Brown v. State, 160 Tex.Cr.R. 150 , 267 S.W.2d 819 , cert. denied, 348 U.S. 888 , 75 S.Ct. 210 , 99 L.Ed. 698 ; Carruthers v. … Crenshaw v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 389 S.W.2d 676 ; Finch v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 399 S.W.2d 544 ; Walker v. State, 90 Tex.Cr.R. 56 , 232 S.W. 509 .

Robinson v. State

71 Tex. Crim. 561 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 29, 1913

Williams v. State, 41 Texas Crim. Rep., 98 ; Wilburn v. State, 41 Texas Crim. Rep., 237 ; Brown v. State, 7 Texas Crim. App., 619; Rodriguez v. State, 12 Texas Crim. App., 552; Reed v. State, 14 Texas Crim. … App., 586; Treadwell v. State, 16 Texas Crim. App., 643. We call special attention to the eases of Reed and Treadwell, supra. It is deemed unnecessary to follow this further.

Nelson v. State

108 Tex. Crim. 69 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 26, 1927

Appellant relies on the cases of Elliott v. State, 277 S. W. 141 , and Asher v. State, 277 S. W. 1099 , to support his contention. .In those cases, and in the case of Brown v. State, 276 S. … Norton v. State, 277 S. W. 141 . We have not undertaken to discuss in detail other matters complained of by appellant as error, but have carefully considered them and find no reversible error. The judgment is affirmed.

Retzlaff, Ex Parte Thomas Christopher

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 19, 2004

DUE PROCESS In Greenholtz v. … See Greenholtz v.

Williams v. State

102 Tex. Crim. 251 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 11, 1925

See also Brown v. State, No. 8718, opinion October 28, 1925. … Fulcher v. State, 28 Texas Crim. App. 465; Simmons v. State, 50 Texas Crim. Rep. 527 ; Swisher v. State, 84 S. W. Rep. 911 ; Ripley v. State, 58 Texas. Crim. Rep. 489.