Case law

Insall, Ex Parte Steven Donald

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 23, 2007

Ex Parte Brown , 158 S.W.3d 449 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). … See, e.g., Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002); Roper v. Simmons , 543 U.S. 551 (2005).

Hardison v. State

597 S.W.2d 355 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 7, 1980

The police officer was told that the appellant would be wearing a light green suit with a green vest and a brown hat. … In Tarpley v.

Scheanette, Dale Devon

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Sep 15, 2004

Appellant relies upon Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and Ring v. Arizona , 536 U.S. 584 (2002), to support his position. We have previously addressed and rejected this argument. Hankins v. … Bone v. State , 77 S.W.3d 828, 833 (Tex. Crim. App. 2002); Chambers v. State , 903 S.W.2d 21, 33 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995).

Gosch v. State

829 S.W.2d 775 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 18, 1991

See Valdez v. … The phrase can be traced to Brown v.

Ex Parte Wilbarger

41 Tex. Crim. 514 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 21, 1900

Lytle v. Halff, supra. … Ed., 482 ; Perkins v. Corbin, 45 Ala., 118 ; Brown, Jur., 30; Works, Courts and Jur., p. 68.

Slawson v. State

39 Tex. Crim. 176 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 20, 1898

See Curry v. State, 4 Texas Crim. App., 574; Brown v. State, 7 Texas Crim. App., 569; George v. State, 11 Texas Crim. App., 95; Pefferling v. State, 40 Texas, 486 .

Quaternick v. State

84 Tex. Crim. 40 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 5, 1918

See also Brown v. State, 74 Texas Crim. Rep., 498 , 168 S. W. Rep., 861 ; Wilkerson v. State, 44 Texas Crim. Rep., 455 ; Mosely v. State, 18 Texas Crim. App., 311; Blasdell v. State, 5 Texas Crim. App., 263. … In support of this contention appellant relies upon Drechsel v. State, 35 Texas Crim.

Dickey v. State

552 S.W.2d 467 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 14, 1977

OPINION BROWN, Commissioner. This is an appeal from an order revoking probation. … In Balli v.

Walker v. State

90 Tex. Crim. 56 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 25, 1921

V. Stuterville, one of the officers present upon the occasion." … This case in no way militates against the doctrine announced in Brown v. State, 87 Texas Crim. Rep., 261 .

Adams v. State

685 S.W.2d 661 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 27, 1985

Brown v. State, 672 S.W.2d 487 (Tex.Cr.App.1984); Mitchell v. State, 650 S.W.2d 801 (Tex.Cr.App.1983). … Brown, supra; Passmore v. State, 617 S.W.2d 682 (Tex.Cr.App.1981).

Lucas v. State

134 Tex. Crim. 87 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 3, 1938

Crowley v. State, 35 S. W. (2d) 437 . It is shown in bill of exception No. 2 that Porter L. … Stevens v. State, 110 S. W. (2d) 906 . Stevens v. State, supra, is also authority supporting our conclusion that the inspectors were not accomplice witnesses.

Pena v. State

191 S.W.3d 133 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 26, 2006

Id. at 526-527. .Browning v. Burt, 66 Ohio St.3d 544, 564 , 613 N.E.2d 993 , 1008 (1993)(distinguishing State v.l 981 Dodge Ram Van ), cert. denied sub nom., St. Elizabeth Med. Ctr. v. … Browning, 510 U.S. 1111 , 114 S.Ct. 1054 , 127 L.Ed.2d 375 (1994).

Taylor v. State

81 Tex. Crim. 359 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 23, 1917

Murphy v. State, 36 Texas Crim. Rep., 24 ; Burkhalter v. State, 79 Texas crim. Rep., 336, 184 S. W. Rep., 221 ; Pace v. State, 135 S. W. Rep., 379 ; Kirby v. State, 49 Texas Crim. Rep., 517 , 93 S. W. … Wallace v. State, *365 46 Texas Crim. Rep., 349 ; McCorquodale v. State, 54 Texas Crim. Rep., 344 , 98 S. W. Rep., 881 ; Ogden v. State, 58 S. W. Rep., 1018 ; Brown v. State, 74 Texas Crim. Rep., 356 .

State Ex Rel. Holmes v. Salinas

784 S.W.2d 421 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 14, 1990

Brown v. State, 475 S.W.2d 938 (Tex.Cr.App.1972); Harris, supra, and cases there cited. … Brown, supra; Murphy v. State, 424 S.W.2d 231 (Tex.Cr.App.1968).

Brown, Jerome Diego

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Aug 30, 2006

WR-33,202-11 EX PARTE JEROME DIEGO BROWN, Applicant ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 0514634 IN THE 371ST DISTRICT COURT FROM TARRANT COUNTY Per curiam. … Sanders v. U.S. , 373 U.S. 1 (1963); Ex parte Carr , 511 S.W.2d 523 (Tex. Crim. App. 1977).

Hughes v. State

59 Tex. Crim. 360 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 18, 1910

See Brown v. State, 16 Texas Crim. App., 245; Pratt v. State, 19 Texas Crim. App., 276, and Clark v. State, 23 Texas Crim. App., 260. The judgment of the lower court is therefore reversed and th<3 cause dismissed.

McLane v. State

153 Tex. Crim. 23 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 26, 1949

By sufficient averments in the complaint and information it was charged that appellant possessed for the purpose of sale in Brown County, Texas, whiskey, and that Brown County was dry area. … Waltrip v. State, 134 Tex. Cr. Rep. 202, 114 S. W. (2d) 555 ; Walker v. State, 138 Tex. Cr. R. 230 , 135 S. W. (2d) 498 ; Stover v. State, 145 Tex. Cr. R. 426 , 168 S. W. (2d) 871 .

Ex Parte Keller

173 S.W.3d 492 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 5, 2005

Gov’t Code § 311.023(6); see Boykin v. … Statutory terms should be interpreted consistently in every part of an act”) (citations omitted); Brown v.

Crenshaw v. State

389 S.W.2d 676 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 14, 1965

Joyner to put the money in a brown bag and, after forcing Mr. Joyner to accompany him for a distance, fled with some $112.00 in currency which Mr. … Cawley v. State, 166 Tex.Cr.R. 37 , 310 S.W.2d 340 , cert. denied, 361 U.S. 920 , 80 S.Ct. 266 , 4 L.Ed.2d 188 ; Cox v. State, 170 Tex.Cr.R. 128 , 338 S.W.2d 711 ; Hutchins v. State, 172 Tex.Cr.R. 525 , 360 S.W.2d 534 .

Ex parte Farnsworth

135 S.W. 538 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 1, 1911

It further appears that said ordinance was never enacted by the mayor and board of commissioners, and was, in fact, in no way acted on by the mayor and board of commissioners other or further than when it was presented by … See Southwestern Telegraph & Telephone Co. v. City of Dallas (recently decided by the Supreme Court, and not yet. officially reported) 134 S. W. 321 , and Ex parte J. E.